Literature DB >> 27560557

Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study.

Lindsay Beckwith1, Kristin Magner2, Sara Kritzer3, Carri R Warshak1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assess the impact of obesity on successful cervical ripening with mechanical versus prostaglandin ripening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared obese to non-obese women in an analysis stratified by induction method, prostaglandin versus mechanical. Misoprostol dosing was the same for obese and non-obese women. Pitocin was titrated to effect. Our primary outcome was failure to achieve active labor. Secondary outcomes included overall cesarean delivery rate, doses of misoprostol used and need for protocol deviation.
RESULTS: Obese women had a higher cesarean delivery rate with misoprostol (35% versus 26%, p = 0.03) but not with mechanical ripening (31% versus 29%, p = 0.69). Obesity was associated with a higher rate of failure to achieve active labor in women undergoing prostaglandin ripening with misoprostol (24 versus 15%, p = 0.01) but not in women undergoing mechanical ripening (19 versus 15%, p = 0.55). After controlling for confounding variables, obese women who underwent cervical ripening with misoprostol had a higher rate of failure to achieve active labor, aOR 1.29 (95%CI: 1.00-1.67), which was not seen with mechanical ripening, aOR 1.09 (95%CI: 0.69-1.73).
CONCLUSION: Obese women receiving the same dose of misoprostol as non-obese women have higher rates of failure to achieve active labor, an effect not seen with mechanical ripening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Misoprostol; cervical ripening; induction; obesity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27560557     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1220523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  5 in total

1.  Metabolic Pathways Associated With Term Labor Induction Course in African American Women.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Jennifer K Frediani; Elizabeth J Corwin; Anne Dunlop; Dean Jones
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Roy Lauterbach; Dikla Ben Zvi; Haneen Dabaja; Ragda Zidan; Naphtali Justman; Dana Vitner; Ron Beloosesky; Nadir Ghanem; Yuval Ginsberg; Yaniv Zipori; Zeev Weiner; Nizar Khatib
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Influence of Maternal Obesity on Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica A Ellis; Carolyn M Brown; Brian Barger; Nicole S Carlson
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women.

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Tilman Born; Christel Weiss; Florian Faschingbauer; Jutta Pretscher; Matthias W Beckmann; Marc Sütterlin; Ulf Dammer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-01

5.  Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?

Authors:  Valentin Nicolae Varlas; Georgiana Bostan; Bogdana Adriana Nasui; Nicolae Bacalbasa; Anca Lucia Pop
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.