Kelly A Aschbrenner1, John A Naslund2, Stephen J Bartels1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. 2. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is potential for peer support to enhance healthy lifestyle interventions targeting changes in body weight and fitness for adults with serious mental illness. The purpose of this study was to explore peer-to-peer support among individuals participating in a group lifestyle intervention that included social media to enhance in-person weight management sessions. METHOD: A mixed methods study design was used to explore participants' perceptions and experiences of support from other group members during a 6-month group lifestyle intervention. Twenty-five individuals with serious mental illness reported their perceptions of the peer group environment and social support during the intervention. Seventeen of these individuals also participated in focus group interviews further exploring their experiences with group members. RESULTS: More than 80% of participants agreed that other group members were trustworthy and dependable, and 92% reported a high level of shared purpose and active participation in the group. Participants described how shared learning and group problem-solving activities fostered friendships and provided essential support for health behavior change. Sharing information, personal successes and challenges, and "being in the same boat" as other group members were key features of peer-to-peer support. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Findings from this exploratory study suggest that participants enrolled in a group-based lifestyle intervention for people with serious mental illness experience peer-to-peer support in various ways that promote health behavior change. These findings highlight opportunities to enhance future lifestyle interventions with collaborative learning and social network technologies that foster peer support among participants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: There is potential for peer support to enhance healthy lifestyle interventions targeting changes in body weight and fitness for adults with serious mental illness. The purpose of this study was to explore peer-to-peer support among individuals participating in a group lifestyle intervention that included social media to enhance in-person weight management sessions. METHOD: A mixed methods study design was used to explore participants' perceptions and experiences of support from other group members during a 6-month group lifestyle intervention. Twenty-five individuals with serious mental illness reported their perceptions of the peer group environment and social support during the intervention. Seventeen of these individuals also participated in focus group interviews further exploring their experiences with group members. RESULTS: More than 80% of participants agreed that other group members were trustworthy and dependable, and 92% reported a high level of shared purpose and active participation in the group. Participants described how shared learning and group problem-solving activities fostered friendships and provided essential support for health behavior change. Sharing information, personal successes and challenges, and "being in the same boat" as other group members were key features of peer-to-peer support. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Findings from this exploratory study suggest that participants enrolled in a group-based lifestyle intervention for people with serious mental illness experience peer-to-peer support in various ways that promote health behavior change. These findings highlight opportunities to enhance future lifestyle interventions with collaborative learning and social network technologies that foster peer support among participants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Lisa M Nackers; Pamela J Dubyak; Xiaomin Lu; Stephen D Anton; Gareth R Dutton; Michael G Perri Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Stephen J Bartels; Sarah I Pratt; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Laura K Barre; John A Naslund; Rosemarie Wolfe; Haiyi Xie; Gregory J McHugo; Daniel E Jimenez; Ken Jue; James Feldman; Bruce L Bird Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Benjamin G Druss; Ilise Lombardo; Cedric O'Gorman; James P Harnett; Kafi N Sanders; Jose M Alvir; Brian J Cuffel Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Liping Zhao; Silke A von Esenwein; Joseph R Bona; Larry Fricks; Sherry Jenkins-Tucker; Evelina Sterling; Ralph Diclemente; Kate Lorig Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Marc DE Hert; Christoph U Correll; Julio Bobes; Marcelo Cetkovich-Bakmas; Dan Cohen; Itsuo Asai; Johan Detraux; Shiv Gautam; Hans-Jurgen Möller; David M Ndetei; John W Newcomer; Richard Uwakwe; Stefan Leucht Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Sunny Jung Kim; Gregory J McHugo; Jürgen Unützer; Stephen J Bartels; Lisa A Marsch Journal: Psychiatr Rehabil J Date: 2017-02-09
Authors: Gigi Toh; Eiluned Pearce; John Vines; Sarah Ikhtabi; Mary Birken; Alexandra Pitman; Sonia Johnson Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Florine Walburg; Johanna Willemina de Joode; Hella Brandt; Maurits van Tulder; Marcel Adriaanse; Berno van Meijel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 3.752