| Literature DB >> 27560040 |
Lena Rubi1, Xaver Koenig1, Helmut Kubista1, Hannes Todt1, Karlheinz Hilber1.
Abstract
Kir2.x channels in ventricular cardiomyocytes (most prominently Kir2.1) account for the inward rectifier potassium current IK1, which controls the resting membrane potential and the final phase of action potential repolarization. Recently it was hypothesized that the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC) is important in the regulation of Kir2.x channels. To test this hypothesis, we investigated potential IK1 abnormalities in dystrophin-deficient ventricular cardiomyocytes derived from the hearts of Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models. We found that IK1 was substantially diminished in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyocytes when compared to wild type myocytes. This finding represents the first functional evidence for a significant role of the DAPC in the regulation of Kir2.x channels.Entities:
Keywords: Duchenne muscular dystrophy; IK1 inward rectifier potassium current; dystrophin-associated protein complex; dystrophin-deficient mouse models; ventricular cardiomyocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27560040 PMCID: PMC5398571 DOI: 10.1080/19336950.2016.1228498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Channels (Austin) ISSN: 1933-6950 Impact factor: 2.581
Figure 1.IK1 in wt and dystrophic ventricular cardiomyocytes. (A) Typical original potassium current traces of a wt, mdx, and mdx-utr cardiomyocyte elicited from a holding potential of −100 mV by 500-ms steps to various voltages (the pulse protocol is shown in the inset of Fig. 1B). The dashed line indicates the zero current level. (B) Current density-voltage relationships derived from a series of experiments as shown in Fig. 1A (n = 38 for wt, 36 for mdx, and 13 for mdx-utr, respectively). The current levels at the end of the test pulse were evaluated and plotted against the applied voltages. The lines through the data points represent fits with the function: y = Y0/(1 + exp((x-V05)/k)). (C) Current density values at −100 mV (means ± SEM) are compared between wt and dystrophic (mdx and mdx-utr) cardiomyocytes. *** indicates that ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference between the tested groups (p < 0.001). (D) Current density values at −100 mV of wt and dystrophic cardiomyocytes from all experiments on female (♀) mice (n = 14 for wt, 15 for mdx, and 13 for mdx-utr). ** p < 0.01, ANOVA. E: Current density values at −100 mV of wt and mdx cardiomyocytes from all experiments on male (♂) mice (n = 24 for wt and 21 for mdx). * p < 0.05 (p = 0.011), Student's t-test.
Figure 2.Kir2.1 protein exparession and localization in wt and dystrophic ventricular cardiomyocytes. (A) Representative western blot experiment of membrane lysates from adult wt and dystrophic (mdx and mdx-utr) ventricular tissues stained for Kir2.1 and the β-subunit of a Gs protein (AS7). The latter was used as loading control. (B) Relative band intensities of Kir2.1 normalized to the respective band intensities of the loading control plotted as means ± SEM for wt (n = 5) and dystrophic (mdx, n = 6; mdx-utr, n = 2) animals. A Student's t-test did not reveal a significant difference between wt and mdx (p = 0.11; n.s., not significant). (C) Typical examples of Kir2.1 immunostainings of an isolated wt (left) and mdx (right) cardiomyocyte.