Literature DB >> 27560021

Use of a Noise Optimized Monoenergetic Algorithm for Patient-Size Independent Selection of an Optimal Energy Level During Dual-Energy CT of the Pancreas.

Davide Bellini1, Sonia Gupta, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Wanyi Fu, Sandra S Stinnett, Bhavik Patel, Achille Mileto, Daniele Marin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of a second-generation noise-optimized monoenergetic algorithm on selection of the optimal energy level, image quality, and effect of patient body habitus for dual-energy multidetector computed tomography of the pancreas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (38 men, 21 women) underwent dual-energy multidetector computed tomography (80/Sn140 kV) in the pancreatic parenchymal phase. Image data sets, at energy levels ranging from 40 to 80 keV (in 5-keV increments), were reconstructed using first-generation and second-generation noise-optimized monoenergetic algorithm. Noise, pancreatic contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRpancreas), and CNR with a noise constraint (CNRNC) were calculated and compared among the different reconstructed data sets. Qualitative assessment of image quality was performed by 3 readers.
RESULTS: For all energy levels below 70 keV, noise was significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) and CNRpancreas significantly higher (P < 0.001), with the second-generation monoenergetic algorithm. Furthermore, the second-generation algorithm was less susceptible to variability related to patient body habitus in the selection of the optimal energy level. The maximal CNRpancreas occurred at 40 keV in 98% (58 of 59) of patients with the second-generation monoenergetic algorithm. However, the CNRNC and readers' image quality scores showed that, even with a second-generation monoenergetic algorithm, higher reconstructed energy levels (60-65 keV) represented the optimal energy level.
CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation noise-optimized monoenergetic algorithm can improve the image quality of lower-energy monoenergetic images of the pancreas, while decreasing the variability related to patient body habitus in selection of the optimal energy level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27560021     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Dual-layer DECT for multiphasic hepatic CT with 50 percent iodine load: a matched-pair comparison with a 120 kVp protocol.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Takeshi Nakaura; Seitaro Oda; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yoshinori Funama; Yuji Iyama; Narumi Taguchi; Tomohiro Namimoto; Hideaki Yuki; Masafumi Kidoh; Kenichiro Hirata; Masataka Nakagawa; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Dual energy CT applications in pancreatic pathologies.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Jeremy R Wortman; Urvi P Fulwadhva; Jennifer W Uyeda; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Objective and subjective comparison of virtual monoenergetic vs. polychromatic images in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lucian Beer; Michael Toepker; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Christian Schestak; Anja Dutschke; Martin Schindl; Alexander Wressnegger; Helmut Ringl; Paul Apfaltrer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Subjective and Objective Assessment of Monoenergetic and Polyenergetic Images Acquired by Dual-Energy CT in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Wang; Daihong Liu; Shixi Jiang; Xiangfei Zeng; Lan Li; Tao Yu; Jiuquan Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  The optimal monoenergetic spectral image level of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography on a dual-layer spectral detector CT with half-dose contrast media.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Sizhe Gao; Yue Ma; Xiaomei Lu; Zheng Jia; Yang Hou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

6.  Dual-layer spectral CT improves image quality of multiphasic pancreas CT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Shota Tanoue; Taihei Inoue; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.