Literature DB >> 27559506

Clinical and dermatoscopic features of porokeratosis palmaris et plantaris.

Satish Udare1, Karishma Hemmady1.   

Abstract

A dermatoscope is an important tool in a dermatologist's armamentarium as it can eliminate the need for a biopsy in a wide array of conditions. Porokeratosis was described by Mibelli and Respighi in 1893, as a disorder of keratinization which on the basis of distribution patterns was described as five clinical variants that portrayed a coronoid lamella on histopathology. We describe a case of asymptomatic, long-standing palmar and plantar pits, which on dermatoscopy showed features suggestive of porokeratosis, which was later reconfirmed by histopathologic sections. This report depicts diagnostic features of porokeratosis and obviates the need for invasive procedures for its diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronoid lamella; palmar pits; punctate porokeratosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27559506      PMCID: PMC4976410          DOI: 10.4103/2229-5178.185483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J        ISSN: 2229-5178


Porokeratosis is a heterogeneous group of disorders that are characterized clinically by a keratotic ridge with a central groove and histologically by the presence of a coronoid lamella.[1] It has been hypothesized that the condition may occur due to ultraviolet exposure,[2] immunosuppression,[3] or radiation therapy hence leading to the understanding that porokeratosis may be a premalignant condition.[4] A 40-year-old man, without a remarkable medical history, presented with multiple asymptomatic pits on the palms and soles, which were static over the last 5 years. Physical examination showed minute discreet 2–3 mm crateriform lesions with surrounding normal skin and scaly well-defined borders on the palms [Figure 1]. Similar lesions were seen on the plantar aspect of feet [Figure 2]. No other cutaneous or mucosal pathology was noticed. Dermatoscopy of the lesions was done, which revealed multiple yellowish annular structures that resembled volcanic craters. The periphery of each lesion showed a “white-track” structure with homogeneous tan brown globules in the center [Figure 3]. Gentian violet application stained and highlighted the lesion periphery on dermatoscopy [Figure 4]. The lesions were diagnosed on the basis of dermatoscopy as porokeratosis palmaris et plantaris, which was confirmed on biopsy. Serial histopathology sections, with H & E staining, revealed compact hyperkeratosis with small zones of perpendicularly oriented parakeratosis, hence confirming the dermatoscopic diagnosis of porokeratosis [Figure 5].
Figure 1

Minute discrete 2–3 mm crateriform lesions with surrounding normal skin and scaly well-defined borders

Figure 2

2–3 mm crateriform minute lesions with well-defined borders on the plantar aspect of feet

Figure 3

The periphery of each lesion showed a “white-track” structure with homogenous tan brown globules in the center on dermatoscopy

Figure 4

Gentian violet application stained and highlighted the lesion periphery on dermatoscopy

Figure 5

Compact hyperkeratosis with zones of parakeratosis, which are perpendicularly oriented (H and E, 10x)

Minute discrete 2–3 mm crateriform lesions with surrounding normal skin and scaly well-defined borders 2–3 mm crateriform minute lesions with well-defined borders on the plantar aspect of feet The periphery of each lesion showed a “white-track” structure with homogenous tan brown globules in the center on dermatoscopy Gentian violet application stained and highlighted the lesion periphery on dermatoscopy Compact hyperkeratosis with zones of parakeratosis, which are perpendicularly oriented (H and E, 10x) Multiple methodologies have been recruited to diagnose porokeratosis without the need for a biopsy. These include the application of gentian violet over the lesion and removal of excess dye with alcohol.[5] This method highlights the keratotic ridge due to accumulation of the dye in the groove. In the same manner, povidone iodine has also been used to accentuate the groove.[6] Delfino et al. described their findings of porokeratosis, using a 10-fold magnification stereomicroscope, as the outline of a volcanic crater observed from a high point.[7] In our case, dermatoscopic features were consistent with porokeratosis and a diagnosis was made prior to procuring the histology report. The lesions were multiple and minute involving only the palms leading to a final diagnosis of punctate porokeratosis. The classical coronoid lamella may be missed if the biopsy does not involve the hyperkeratotic ridge. Serial sections may be required to identify the cornoid lamella when the hyperkeratotic ridge is biopsied; however, sometimes the cornoid lamella may be small that it may be missed. This report highlights dermatoscopic features that aid in the diagnosis of porokeratosis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  7 in total

1.  Porokeratosis of mibelli with nail dystrophy.

Authors:  Kaliaperumal Karthikeyan; Devinder Mohan Thappa; Carounanidy Udayashankar
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.005

2.  Porokeratosis and povidone-iodine: a new clinical diagnostic sign.

Authors:  P Redondo; M A Sola; P Lloret
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Dermoscopy for the diagnosis of porokeratosis.

Authors:  Mario Delfino; Giuseppe Argenziano; Massimiliano Nino
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Medical pearl: Gentian violet to highlight the cornoid lamella in disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis.

Authors:  Chad J Thomas; Dirk M Elston
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Fake sun tan diagnosis of porokeratosis.

Authors:  R P Katugampola; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Atypical porokeratosis developing following bone marrow transplantation in a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Sang Hee Cha; Hyun Jeong Park; Jun Young Lee; Baik Kee Cho
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 1.444

7.  Porokeratosis of Mibelli and superficial disseminated porokeratosis.

Authors:  Giovanni M Palleschi; Daniele Torchia
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.587

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.