As basic knowledge for evaluation of pancreatic toxicity, anatomical structures were compared among experimental animal species, including rats, dogs, monkeys, and minipigs. In terms of gross anatomy, the pancreases of dogs, monkeys, and minipigs are compact and similar to that of humans. The rat pancreas is relatively compact at the splenic segment, but the duodenal segment is dispersed within the mesentery. In terms of histology, the islet of each animal is characterized by a topographic distribution pattern of α- versus β-cells. β-cells occupy the large central part of the rat islet, and α-cells are located in the periphery and occasionally exhibit cuffing. In dog islets, β-cells are distributed in all parts and α-cells are scattered in the center or periphery of the islet (at body and left lobe); whereas β-cells occupy all parts of the islet and no α-cells are present in the islet (at right lobe). Monkey islets show two distinct patterns, that is, α-cell-rich or β-cell-rich islets, and the former represent peripheral β-cells forming an irregular ring. Minipig islets show an irregular outline, and both α- and β-cells are present in all parts of the islet, intermingling with each other. According to morphometry, the endocrine tissue accounts for <2% of the pancreas roughly in rats and minipigs, and that of monkeys accounts for >7% of the pancreas (at tail). The endocrine tissue proportion tends to increase as the position changes from right to left in the pancreas in each species.
As basic knowledge for evaluation of pancreatic toxicity, anatomical structures were compared among experimental animal species, including rats, dogs, monkeys, and minipigs. In terms of gross anatomy, the pancreases of dogs, monkeys, and minipigs are compact and similar to that of humans. The rat pancreas is relatively compact at the splenic segment, but the duodenal segment is dispersed within the mesentery. In terms of histology, the islet of each animal is characterized by a topographic distribution pattern of α- versus β-cells. β-cells occupy the large central part of the rat islet, and α-cells are located in the periphery and occasionally exhibit cuffing. In dog islets, β-cells are distributed in all parts and α-cells are scattered in the center or periphery of the islet (at body and left lobe); whereas β-cells occupy all parts of the islet and no α-cells are present in the islet (at right lobe). Monkey islets show two distinct patterns, that is, α-cell-rich or β-cell-rich islets, and the former represent peripheral β-cells forming an irregular ring. Minipig islets show an irregular outline, and both α- and β-cells are present in all parts of the islet, intermingling with each other. According to morphometry, the endocrine tissue accounts for <2% of the pancreas roughly in rats and minipigs, and that of monkeys accounts for >7% of the pancreas (at tail). The endocrine tissue proportion tends to increase as the position changes from right to left in the pancreas in each species.
The pancreas is composed of exocrine digestive gland and endocrine cell islets, the latter
being scattered throughout the former in mammalian species[1],[2],[3].
Exocrine injury can be induced by various agents, and endocrine injury can also be induced
by certain chemicals[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9]. Furthermore, exocrine injury may involve
endocrine tissue[10], [11]. Recently, the endocrine-exocrine interface
has been proposed as another target of injury with regard to pancreatic toxicity, and it is
adaptable to a certain type of pancreatic lesions, peri-islet hemorrhage, and/or fibrosis,
as has been previously reported[12],[13],[14],[15]. To
understand pancreatic toxicity, it is important to understand the anatomical histology
related to the correlation between exocrine and endocrine tissues. There is species-specific
variation in the macroscopic structure and histological appearance of the pancreas; in
particular, the distribution and composition of each endocrine cell in the islets varies
among experimental animals[1],
[4], [8], [10], [16],[17],[18]. Rats and
mice and dogs and monkeys have been used in toxicity studies as rodents and non-rodents,
respectively, in the process of developing new pharmaceutical products. Minipigs have been
utilized as experimental animals in recent years[19], [20]. The
aim of this article was to describe the comparative gross and microscopic structures of the
pancreas in rats, dogs, monkeys, and minipigs and to distinguish the distribution patterns
of endocrine cells within the islet of Langerhans.
Development of the Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreas
The pancreas develops from the endoderm at the caudal end of the foregut growing into the
duodenum. The dorsal and ventral pancreatic anlagen appear as separate evaginations of the
foregut, and with cell division, each anlage forms a pancreatic duct to the acinar lobule
structure independently[2],
[4], [21]. The dorsal pancreas forms part of the head,
body, and tail, and the ventral pancreas forms part of the head; these growing glands
merge[2], [4], [21]. The endocrine pancreas develops at the same time as the exocrine
pancreas, and endocrine cells appear to be derived from the same pool of epithelial cells
forming the exocrine pancreas[2],
[21]. The precursor cells may be
developmentally plastic; that is, they may differentiate into either endocrine or exocrine
cells[21]. Endocrine cells are first
observed along the base of the developing acinus[2]. Repetition of modified cell division such that daughter cells escape
linkage to the neighboring epithelial cells leads to accumulation of endocrine cells free of
the acinar-tubular structure[21].
Gross Anatomy of the Pancreas in Experimental Animals
The human pancreas is a compact organ protected from severe trauma by lying close to the
posterior abdominal wall in the upper abdomen[3]. The monkey pancreas appears similar to that of humans[22]. Macroscopic appearances of the pancreas in
experimental animals can be divided into two basic patterns. The first is a diffusely
distributed mesenteric type found in rabbits, and the second is a more compact type found in
hamsters, dogs, and monkeys that is similar to that of humans[10], [23]. The rat and mouse pancreas is classified as an intermediate because the
splenic portion is relatively compact, but the duodenal portion is dispersed within the
mesentery[23]. The minipig pancreas is
compact. The lobation and configuration pattern of the pancreas in each experimental animal
is illustrated in Fig. 1, and photographs of
the macroscopic features of a removed pancreas are shown in Fig. 2.
Fig.
1.
The pancreas of the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig are illustrated
with positional relation to the spleen and gut. The names of the lobes (portions) are
as follows: D, duodenal segment; P, parabiliary segment; G, gastric segment; S,
splenic segment; R, right lobe; B, body; BA, anterior portion of body;
BP, posterior portion of body; L, left lobe; H, head; T,
tail.
Fig. 2.
Macroscopic features of the pancreas in
the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig.
The pancreas of the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig are illustrated
with positional relation to the spleen and gut. The names of the lobes (portions) are
as follows: D, duodenal segment; P, parabiliary segment; G, gastric segment; S,
splenic segment; R, right lobe; B, body; BA, anterior portion of body;
BP, posterior portion of body; L, left lobe; H, head; T,
tail.Macroscopic features of the pancreas in
the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig.
Rats
The pancreas is divided into four parts, the gastric, splenic, parabiliary, and duodenal
segments[24] (Figs. 1 and 2). Recent
textbooks and papers have begun to use somewhat different terms for lobation patterns,
such as (1) duodenal, gastric, and splenic lobes[4], (2) right lobe, body, and left lobe[8], (3) gastric lobe, duodenal head, and tail[23], and (4) head, body, and tail[12], [25]. The gastric lobe in rodents has no counterpart in the other
larger species[25]. Based on anatomical
descriptions of the human pancreas, the head (parabiliary and duodenal segments) is
located on the duodenal side, and the body (gastric and splenic segments) extends from the
head to the stomach and spleen[24]. The
tail (terminal part of the splenic segment) ends near the hilum of the spleen[24]. As mentioned above, the splenic segment is
a somewhat thicker solid gland, whereas the duodenal segment is dispersed within the
mesentery[23]. The caudal part of the
duodenal segment and the dorsal part of the splenic segment are joined together and extend
to near the colon.
Dogs
The pancreas is located in the dorsal part of both the epigastric and mesogastric
abdominal segments, caudal to the liver, and divided into three parts, the right lobe,
body, and left lobe[26] (Figs. 1 and
2). A thin, slender right lobe and a shorter, thicker, and wider left lobe are
united at the body (pancreatic angle), which lies caudomedial to the pylorus[26]. The right lobe lies in the mesoduodenum
extending caudally from the body along the duodenum. The left lobe extends
caudosinistrally from the body to the hilum of the spleen. The pancreas, when hardened in
situ, is in the form of an inverted-V shape[26].
Monkeys
The pancreas is a thick, fairly solid gland extending transversely along the dorsal wall
of the abdomen from the duodenum to the spleen and is divided into three parts, the head,
body, and tail[22], [27] (Figs.
1 and 2). The head lies within the
duodenal loop and is in tight surface-to-surface contact with the duodenum. The body is
directed to the left from the head, though there is no distinct anatomical landmark
between the lobes. The tail is directed to the left with a narrowing of the gland and ends
near the hilum of the spleen.
Minipigs
The pancreas is an extensive thick gland with an irregular outline and is basically
divided into three parts, the head (right lobe), the body (including the neck), and the
tail (left lobe) [3], [25], [28], [29] (Figs. 1 and 2). The head, which is in contact with the gut from
the end of pylorus to the proximal duodenum, extends to the left and connects to the body.
The body separates into two (anterior and posterior) portions that encompass the portal
vein and make the pancreas appear to be “ring-shaped”, and the posterior portion extends
caudally ventral to the right kidney[28],[29],[30]. The
tail is located at the left of the body and extends caudosinistrally ventral to the left
kidney, and it ends near the hilum of the spleen. Meanwhile, other terms for the lobation
pattern, such as “splenic” lobe (corresponding to the tail and body in the human
pancreas), “duodenal” lobe (corresponding to the head of the pancreas), “connecting” lobe
(corresponding to the uncinate process), and “bridge” (serving as an anatomical connection
between the splenic and connecting lobes), have been used in the literature[30]. Moreover, a recent textbook sited two
simplified lobes, the right or head (duodenal portion) and the left or tail (splenic
portion) of the pancreas, in minipigs[8].
Histology of the Pancreas in Experimental Animals
The pancreas is composed of exocrine and endocrine tissues[3], [16]. The exocrine pancreas has a basic common structure among rats, dogs,
monkeys, and minipigs, being composed of two epithelial cell types, acinar and ductal
epithelial cells[4]. The acinar epithelial
cells make up the major portion of the pancreas, and the ductal system is composed of
centroacinar cells, followed by the intercalated, intralobular, interlobular, and main
ducts[4]. The endocrine cells form islets
of Langerhans, and extra-insular endocrine cells are scattered randomly as single cells or
as clusters composed of two to five cells in the components of exocrine gland
tissue[31],[32],[33],[34]. The extra-insular endocrine cells are topographically related to ductal
cells[31],[32],[33]. The topographic distribution and number of
islet endocrine cells differ between the lobes of the pancreas and species[8], [17], [18],
[35]. The histological features of
the pancreas in rats, dogs, monkeys, and minipigs are shown in Fig. 3, with pictures of islets characteristic to each species being shown in Fig. 4. Comparative characteristics of pancreatic
islets in each species of experimental animal are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 3.
Histological features of the pancreas in
the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig with H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for
insulin and glucagon in serial sections. All photographs were taken using a 4×
objective lens. Large islets are visible in the rat and monkey, and middle-sized
islets are visible in the dog (left lobe) and minipig; only small islets are visible
in the dog (right lobe).
Fig. 4.
Histological features of
typical islets in the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig with H&E staining and
immunohistochemistry for insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin in serial sections. The
photographs of the rat, dog, and minipig were taken using a 20× objective lens, and
those of monkey were taken using a 10× objective lens. The photographs in the second
and third rows show peripheral α-cell and central α-cell islets of a dog. The
photographs in the fourth row show a small islet in serial sections of the right lobe
of a dog, and the inset photograph in the third column shows an extra-insular α-cell
found in the same section. The photographs in the fifth and sixth rows show
α-cell-rich and β-cell-rich islets of a monkey.
Table
1.
Lobe Thickness, Area, Size, Extra-insular Endocrine Cell,
and Distribution of α-versus β-cells
Histological features of the pancreas in
the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig with H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for
insulin and glucagon in serial sections. All photographs were taken using a 4×
objective lens. Large islets are visible in the rat and monkey, and middle-sized
islets are visible in the dog (left lobe) and minipig; only small islets are visible
in the dog (right lobe).Histological features of
typical islets in the rat, dog, monkey, and minipig with H&E staining and
immunohistochemistry for insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin in serial sections. The
photographs of the rat, dog, and minipig were taken using a 20× objective lens, and
those of monkey were taken using a 10× objective lens. The photographs in the second
and third rows show peripheral α-cell and central α-cell islets of a dog. The
photographs in the fourth row show a small islet in serial sections of the right lobe
of a dog, and the inset photograph in the third column shows an extra-insular α-cell
found in the same section. The photographs in the fifth and sixth rows show
α-cell-rich and β-cell-rich islets of a monkey.Large- and small-sized islets are mostly present in all segments of the
pancreas[35]. The distribution of α-
versus β-cells in the islet is basically uniform in all segments of the pancreas
regardless of the size of the islet. In the islet, β-cells occupy the large central part,
and α-cells are located in the periphery and occasionally exhibit cuffing[8], [17], [18], [35]. A
small number of the δ-cells are scattered in the periphery[8], [35]. Extra-insular endocrine cells are rare.Middle- and small-sized islets are present in the body and left lobe of the pancreas,
whereas only small islets are present in the right lobe. The distribution pattern of α-
versus β-cells in the islet is also different between the former and latter. In the body
and left lobe, β-cells are distributed in all parts of the islet, and α-cells are
scattered in the center or periphery of the islet against the background of β-cells
regardless of the size of the islet[8], [35]. Fewer
δ-cells are scattered in the center or periphery of the islet. In the right lobe, β-cells
occupy all parts of the islet, and no α-cells are present in the islet, though a few
δ-cells are scattered[8],
[35]. Extra-insular endocrine
cells recognized as α-, β-, and δ-cells are scattered throughout all lobes including the
right one.Large- to small-sized islets are present in all lobes of the pancreas. Two main
distribution patterns of α- versus β-cells are recognized, that is, α-cell-rich or
β-cell-rich islets, in all lobes of the pancreas; although the intermediate pattern of α-
and β-cells is comparable, it is rarely present. In the α-cell-rich islet, α-cells are
distributed in all parts of the islet, and β-cells are scattered or accumulated in the
periphery of the islet, forming an irregular ring[35]. In the β-cell-rich islet, β-cells are distributed in all parts of
the islet, and α-cells are scattered mainly in the center but are occasionally scattered
in the periphery or in all parts of the islet[35]. Large islets tend to be α-cell rich and to be located in the central
area of lobules. Relatively numerous δ-cells are scattered in the center or periphery
equally in both α-cell-rich and β-cell-rich islets[35]. Extra-insular endocrine cells recognized as α-, β-, and δ-cells are
scattered throughout all lobes.Middle- and small-sized islets are present in all lobes of the pancreas. The islets
frequently show an irregular outline for the following reasons: the islet cells get in the
adjacent exocrine tissue and occasionally constitute a part of the acinus[35]. The distribution pattern of α- versus
β-cells in the islet is not distinctive and is basically uniform in all lobes of the
pancreas regardless of the size of the islet. Both α- and β-cells are present in all
parts, central or periphery, of the islet, intermingling with each other. In the islet,
β-cells tend to make a small cluster or band, whereas, α-cells of a large or small number
tend to be scattered separately. Relatively few δ-cells are scattered in all parts of the
islet. Extra-insular endocrine cells recognized as α-, β-, and δ-cells are scattered
throughout all lobes.
Proportion of the Endocrine Component in the Pancreas
According to a histology textbook, the endocrine component represents about 2% of the
pancreas volume, whereas a toxicologic pathology textbook states that the endocrine tissue
comprises <5% of the pancreas and that the exocrine pancreatic tissue comprises the
remaining >95% of the pancreas[3],
[8]. Though the number or volume of
endocrine cells per pancreas varies between different stages of development and also changes
due to age-related or disease-related alterations[1], [36],
[37], the percentage area of each
morphometrically detected endocrine tissue in the pancreas of each sample animal is shown in
Fig. 5. The histological
preparations of a 6-week-old male rat (Crl:CD(SD)), a 21-month-old male dog (beagle), a
56-month-old male monkey (Macaca fascicularis), and a 21-month-old male minipig (Göttingen)
were used as actual samples of appropriate age for toxicity studies. There is large
interspecies and intersegment variability in the proportion of endocrine tissue. Endocrine
tissue accounted for roughly <2% of the pancreas in the rat and minipig, regardless of
intersegment variability. The endocrine component of the monkey accounted for >7% of the
pancreas (tail). In the dog, monkey, and minipig, the endocrine tissue proportion increased
with the change in the position from right (head) to left (tail). In the rat, the endocrine
tissue proportion increased similarly from right (parabiliary) to left (splenic). It is
notable that the α-cell proportion in the right lobe of the dog is 0.02% of the pancreas. In
the monkey and minipig, the α-cell proportion in the tail is higher than in the other lobes
as compared to β-cells. Similar tendencies for the endocrine cell proportions were indicated
in the previous literature[35].
Fig. 5.
Percentage areas of α-, β-, and δ-cells in the pancreas of each species. The area of
each endocrine cell was measured in sections immunostained for insulin, glucagon, and
somatostatin. The total area of the pancreatic tissue was measured in H&E-stained
sections cut sequentially. D, duodenal segment; P, parabiliary segment; G, gastric
segment; S, splenic segment; R, right lobe; B, body; L, left lobe; H, head; T,
tail.
Percentage areas of α-, β-, and δ-cells in the pancreas of each species. The area of
each endocrine cell was measured in sections immunostained for insulin, glucagon, and
somatostatin. The total area of the pancreatic tissue was measured in H&E-stained
sections cut sequentially. D, duodenal segment; P, parabiliary segment; G, gastric
segment; S, splenic segment; R, right lobe; B, body; L, left lobe; H, head; T,
tail.
Authors: Susan A Elmore; Michelle C Cora; Margarita M Gruebbel; Schantel A Hayes; Jessica S Hoane; Haruko Koizumi; Rachel Peters; Thomas J Rosol; Bhanu P Singh; Kathleen A Szabo Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2014-11-09 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Amy L Usborne; Aaron T Smith; Steven K Engle; David E Watson; John M Sullivan; Jennie L Walgren Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Joana Ferrer; William E Scott; Bradley P Weegman; Thomas M Suszynski; David E R Sutherland; Bernhard J Hering; Klearchos K Papas Journal: Transplantation Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Balázs Kui; Zsolt Balla; Eszter T Végh; Petra Pallagi; Viktória Venglovecz; Béla Iványi; Tamás Takács; Péter Hegyi; Zoltán Rakonczay Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Karrie A Brenneman; Shashi K Ramaiah; Cynthia M Rohde; Dean M Messing; Shawn P O'Neil; Lauren M Gauthier; Zachary S Stewart; Srinivasa R Mantena; Kimberly M Shevlin; Christopher G Leonard; Sharon A Sokolowski; Hungyun Lin; Deborah C Carraher; Michael I Jesson; Lindsay Tomlinson; Yutian Zhan; Walter F Bobrowski; Steven A Bailey; W Mark Vogel; Dale L Morris; Laurence O Whiteley; John W Davis Journal: Toxicol Pathol Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.902
Authors: Dennis P Cladis; Shiyu Li; Lavanya Reddivari; Abigail Cox; Mario G Ferruzzi; Connie M Weaver Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: Jami L Saloman; Kathryn M Albers; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; Brian M Davis; Mouad Edderkaoui; Guido Eibl; Ariel Y Epouhe; Jeremy Y Gedeon; Fred S Gorelick; Paul J Grippo; Guy E Groblewski; Sohail Z Husain; Keane K Y Lai; Stephen J Pandol; Aliye Uc; Li Wen; David C Whitcomb Journal: Pancreas Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Stephen Harrington; S Janette Williams; Vern Otte; Sally Barchman; Cheryl Jones; Karthik Ramachandran; Lisa Stehno-Bittel Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Elizabeth M Thompson; Jennifer L Sollinger; Emmanuel C Opara; Christopher A Adin Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 4.064