Literature DB >> 27559198

Evolution of Welding-Fume Aerosols with Time and Distance from the Source: A study was conducted on the spatiotemporal variability in welding-fume concentrations for the characterization of first- and second-hand exposure to welding fumes.

L G Cena1, B T Chen2, M J Keane2.   

Abstract

Gas metal arc welding fumes were generated from mild-steel plates and measured near the arc (30 cm), representing first-hand exposure of the welder, and farther away from the source (200 cm), representing second-hand exposure of adjacent workers. Measurements were taken during 1-min welding runs and at subsequent 5-min intervals after the welding process was stopped. Number size distributions were measured in real time. Particle mass distributions were measured using a micro-orifice uniform deposition impactor, and total mass concentrations were measured with polytetrafluorothylene filters. Membrane filters were used for collecting morphology samples for electron microscopy. Average mass concentrations measured near the arc were 45 mg/m3 and 9 mg/m3 at the farther distance. The discrepancy in concentrations at the two distances was attributed to the presence of spatter particles, which were observed only in the morphology samples near the source. As fumes aged over time, mass concentrations at the farther distance decreased by 31% (6.2 mg/m3) after 5 min and an additional 13% (5.4 mg/m3) after 10 min. Particle number and mass distributions during active welding were similar at both distances, indicating similar exposure patterns for welders and adjacent workers. Exceptions were recorded for particles smaller than 50 nm and larger than 3 μm, where concentrations were higher near the arc, indicating higher exposures of welders. These results were confirmed by microscopy analysis. As residence time increased, number concentrations decreased dramatically. In terms of particle number concentrations, second-hand exposures to welding fumes during active welding may be as high as first-hand exposures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arc Welding; Distance; Exposure Assesment; Morphology; Spatiotemporal Variability; Welding Aerosols

Year:  2016        PMID: 27559198      PMCID: PMC4993166     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Weld J        ISSN: 0043-2296            Impact factor:   1.833


  12 in total

1.  Alterations in welding process voltage affect the generation of ultrafine particles, fume composition, and pulmonary toxicity.

Authors:  James M Antonini; Michael Keane; Bean T Chen; Samuel Stone; Jenny R Roberts; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Ronnee N Andrews; David G Frazer; Krishnan Sriram
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Design, construction, and characterization of a novel robotic welding fume generator and inhalation exposure system for laboratory animals.

Authors:  James M Antonini; Aliakbar A Afshari; Sam Stone; Bean Chen; Diane Schwegler-Berry; W Gary Fletcher; W Travis Goldsmith; Kurt H Vandestouwe; Walter McKinney; Vincent Castranova; David G Frazer
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Number size distribution of fine and ultrafine fume particles from various welding processes.

Authors:  Peter Brand; Klaus Lenz; Uwe Reisgen; Thomas Kraus
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-10-01

4.  Hexavalent chromium and lung cancer in the chromate industry: a quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Robert M Park; James F Bena; Leslie T Stayner; Randall J Smith; Herman J Gibb; Peter S J Lees
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  A Field Study on the Respiratory Deposition of the Nano-Sized Fraction of Mild and Stainless Steel Welding Fume Metals.

Authors:  L G Cena; W P Chisholm; M J Keane; B T Chen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Sequelae of fume exposure in confined space welding: a neurological and neuropsychological case series.

Authors:  Rosemarie M Bowler; Sanae Nakagawa; Marija Drezgic; Harry A Roels; Robert M Park; Emily Diamond; Donna Mergler; Maryse Bouchard; Russell P Bowler; William Koller
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Manganese, iron, and total particulate exposures to welders.

Authors:  Michael R Flynn; Pam Susi
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Hexavalent chromium content in stainless steel welding fumes is dependent on the welding process and shield gas type.

Authors:  Michael Keane; Samuel Stone; Bean Chen; James Slaven; Diane Schwegler-Berry; James Antonini
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2008-12-18

9.  Welding helmet airborne fume concentrations compared to personal breathing zone sampling.

Authors:  D Liu; H Wong; P Quinlan; P D Blanc
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1995-03

10.  Size Distribution and Estimated Respiratory Deposition of Total Chromium, Hexavalent Chromium, Manganese, and Nickel in Gas Metal Arc Welding Fume Aerosols.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Cena; William P Chisholm; Michael J Keane; Amy Cumpston; Bean T Chen
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.908

View more
  3 in total

1.  Acute in vivo pulmonary toxicity assessment of occupationally relevant particulate matter from a cellulose nanofiber board.

Authors:  Nathanial J Parizek; Benjamin R Steines; Ezazul Haque; Ralph Altmaier; Andrea Adamcakova-Dodd; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-02-08

2.  Mimicking the human respiratory system: Online in vitro cell exposure for toxicity assessment of welding fume aerosol.

Authors:  Ryan X Ward; Trevor B Tilly; Syeda Irsa Mazhar; Sarah E Robinson; Arantzazu Eiguren-Fernandez; Jun Wang; Tara Sabo-Attwood; Chang-Yu Wu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Modelled lung deposition and retention of welding fume particles in occupational scenarios: a comparison to doses used in vitro.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Hanna L Karlsson; Ulrika Carlander
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.