Literature DB >> 27559141

Dynamic compensation mechanism gives rise to period and duty-cycle level sets in oscillatory neuronal models.

Horacio G Rotstein1, Motolani Olarinre1, Jorge Golowasch2,3.   

Abstract

Rhythmic oscillation in neurons can be characterized by various attributes, such as the oscillation period and duty cycle. The values of these features depend on the amplitudes of the participating ionic currents, which can be characterized by their maximum conductance values. Recent experimental and theoretical work has shown that the values of these attributes can be maintained constant for different combinations of two or more ionic currents of varying conductances, defining what is known as level sets in conductance space. In two-dimensional conductance spaces, a level set is a curve, often a line, along which a particular oscillation attribute value is conserved. In this work, we use modeling, dynamical systems tools (phase-space analysis), and numerical simulations to investigate the possible dynamic mechanisms responsible for the generation of period and duty-cycle levels sets in simplified (linearized and FitzHugh-Nagumo) and conductance-based (Morris-Lecar) models of neuronal oscillations. A simplistic hypothesis would be that the tonic balance between ionic currents with the same or opposite effective signs is sufficient to create level sets. According to this hypothesis, the dynamics of each ionic current during a given cycle are well captured by some constant quantity (e.g., maximal conductances), and the phase-plane diagrams are identical or are almost identical (e.g., cubic-like nullclines with the same maxima and minima) for different combinations of these maximal conductances. In contrast, we show that these mechanisms are dynamic and involve the complex interaction between the nonlinear voltage dependencies and the effective time scales at which the ionic current's dynamical variables operate.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central pattern generator; level sets; oscillators; phase plane; speed graph

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27559141      PMCID: PMC6347101          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00357.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Coregulation of voltage-dependent kinetics of Na(+) and K(+) currents in electric organ.

Authors:  M L McAnelly; H H Zakon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  On the role of subthreshold dynamics in neuronal signaling.

Authors:  J R Clay; A Shrier
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Global structure, robustness, and modulation of neuronal models.

Authors:  M S Goldman; J Golowasch; E Marder; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Tuning pacemaker frequency of individual dopaminergic neurons by Kv4.3L and KChip3.1 transcription.

Authors:  B Liss; O Franz; S Sewing; R Bruns; H Neuhoff; J Roeper
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  From subthreshold to firing-rate resonance.

Authors:  Magnus J E Richardson; Nicolas Brunel; Vincent Hakim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Thresholds and plateaus in the Hodgkin-Huxley nerve equations.

Authors:  R FITZHUGH
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1960-05       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Animal-to-animal variability in motor pattern production in adults and during growth.

Authors:  Dirk Bucher; Astrid A Prinz; Eve Marder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Robustness of burst firing in dissociated purkinje neurons with acute or long-term reductions in sodium conductance.

Authors:  Andrew M Swensen; Bruce P Bean
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Activity-independent coregulation of IA and Ih in rhythmically active neurons.

Authors:  Jason N MacLean; Ying Zhang; Marie L Goeritz; Richard Casey; Ricardo Oliva; John Guckenheimer; Ronald M Harris-Warrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Gain control by concerted changes in I(A) and I(H) conductances.

Authors:  Denis Burdakov
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  4 in total

1.  The shaping of intrinsic membrane potential oscillations: positive/negative feedback, ionic resonance/amplification, nonlinearities and time scales.

Authors:  Horacio G Rotstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Mechanisms of generation of membrane potential resonance in a neuron with multiple resonant ionic currents.

Authors:  David M Fox; Hua-An Tseng; Tomasz G Smolinski; Horacio G Rotstein; Farzan Nadim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  Data Assimilation Methods for Neuronal State and Parameter Estimation.

Authors:  Matthew J Moye; Casey O Diekman
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.300

4.  Ionic current correlations are ubiquitous across phyla.

Authors:  Trinh Tran; Cagri T Unal; Daniel Severin; Laszlo Zaborszky; Horacio G Rotstein; Alfredo Kirkwood; Jorge Golowasch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.