Literature DB >> 27559063

Number sense and state-dependent valuation in cuttlefish.

Tsang-I Yang1, Chuan-Chin Chiao2.   

Abstract

Identifying the amount of prey available is an important part of an animal's foraging behaviour. The risk-sensitive foraging theory predicts that an organism's foraging decisions with regard to food rewards depending upon its satiation level. However, the precise interaction between optimal risk-tolerance and satiation level remains unclear. In this study, we examined, firstly, whether cuttlefish, with one of the most highly evolved nervous system among the invertebrates, have number sense, and secondly, whether their valuation of food reward is satiation state dependent. When food such as live shrimps is present, without training, cuttlefish turn toward the prey and initiate seizure behaviour. Using this visual attack behaviour as a measure, cuttlefish showed a preference for a larger quantity when faced with two-alternative forced choice tasks (1 versus 2, 2 versus 3, 3 versus 4 and 4 versus 5). However, cuttlefish preferred the small quantity when the choice was between one live and two dead shrimps. More importantly, when the choice was between one large live shrimp and two small live shrimps (a prey size and quantity trade-off), the cuttlefish chose the large single shrimp when they felt hunger, but chose the two smaller prey when they were satiated. These results demonstrate that cuttlefish are capable of number discrimination and that their choice of prey number depends on the quality of the prey and on their appetite state. The findings also suggest that cuttlefish integrate both internal and external information when making a foraging decision and that the cost of obtaining food is inversely correlated with their satiation level, a phenomenon similar to the observation that metabolic state alters economic decision making under risk among humans.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  foraging decision making; number discrimination; satiation level

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27559063      PMCID: PMC5013800          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps.

Authors:  Matthias Wittlinger; Rüdiger Wehner; Harald Wolf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The "prawn-in-the-tube" procedure in the cuttlefish: habituation or passive avoidance learning?

Authors:  Véronique Agin; Raymond Chichery; Ludovic Dickel; Marie-Paule Chichery
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Two-stage recovery of a response in Sepia.

Authors:  J B Messenger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-07-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  J B Messenger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1968 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Kerry E Jordan; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The role of numerical competence in a specialized predatory strategy of an araneophagic spider.

Authors:  Ximena J Nelson; Robert R Jackson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Metabolic state alters economic decision making under risk in humans.

Authors:  Mkael Symmonds; Julian J Emmanuel; Megan E Drew; Rachel L Batterham; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Numerical cognition in bees and other insects.

Authors:  Mario Pahl; Aung Si; Shaowu Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-18

10.  Quantity Estimation Based on Numerical Cues in the Mealworm Beetle (Tenebrio molitor).

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Reyes Fernández-Perea; Enrique Font
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-21
View more
  16 in total

1.  A primarily serial, foveal accumulator underlies approximate numerical estimation.

Authors:  Samuel J Cheyette; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Numbers and brains.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The deep history of the number words.

Authors:  Mark Pagel; Andrew Meade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A unified account of numerosity perception.

Authors:  Samuel J Cheyette; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-09-14

Review 5.  Counting insects.

Authors:  Peter Skorupski; HaDi MaBouDi; Hiruni Samadi Galpayage Dona; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Bumblebees Use Sequential Scanning of Countable Items in Visual Patterns to Solve Numerosity Tasks.

Authors:  HaDi MaBouDi; H Samadi Galpayage Dona; Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Emma Buckley; Panayiotis D Onoufriou; Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Learned valuation during forage decision-making in cuttlefish.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsin Kuo; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 8.  Cephalopods as Predators: A Short Journey among Behavioral Flexibilities, Adaptions, and Feeding Habits.

Authors:  Roger Villanueva; Valentina Perricone; Graziano Fiorito
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  The role of item size on choosing contrasted food quantities in angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare).

Authors:  Luis M Gómez-Laplaza; Laura Romero; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Poor numerical performance of guppies tested in a Skinner box.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Alberto Testolin; Angelo Bisazza; Marco Zorzi; Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.