| Literature DB >> 27558909 |
Ling Li1,2, Ye Qu3, Xin Jin2, Xiao Qin Guo3, Yue Wang1,3, Lin Qi3, Jing Yang3, Peng Zhang4, Ling Zhi Li1,5.
Abstract
<Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27558909 PMCID: PMC4997314 DOI: 10.1038/srep32131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Protective effects of SAL against theCoCl2-induced loss of viability and increase in apoptosis ofMG-63 and ROB cells.
(a) MG-63 cells were pre-treated with SAL (1–1000 nM) for 24 h, followed by treatment with CoCl2 (0.5 mM) for an additional 24 h in the presence of SAL. (b) ROB cells were pre-treated with SAL (1–1000 nM) for 24 h, followed by treatment with CoCl2 (0.3 mM) for an additional 24 h in the presence of SAL. (c) The mean percentage of apoptotic MG-63 cells was measured via flow cytometric assay. Cells were pre-treated with or without SAL for 24 h, followed by treatment with CoCl2 (0.5 mM) for an additional 24 h. (d) The mean percentage of apoptotic ROB cells was measured by flow cytometric assay. Cells were pre-treated with or without SAL for 24 h, followed by treatment with CoCl2 (0.3 mM) for an additional 24 h. **P < 0.01 compared with control; ##P < 0.01 compared with CoCl2. The data are expressed as the means ± SD.
Figure 2Protective effect of SAL against the CoCl2-induced loss of MG-63 and ROB cell differentiation.
MG-63 or ROB cells were cultured in 1% FBS in the presence of either SAL (1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM) or vehicle, followed by treatment with CoCl2 for 2, 4, or 6 days. After SAL treatment, ALP activity was measured in MG-63 cells (a) or ROB cells (d) using an ALP activity assay kit. After SAL treatment, the level of type I collagen secretion in the cell culture supernatants of MG-63 cells (b) or ROB cells (e) was analysed by ELISA. After SAL treatment, the production of osteocalcin in the cell culture supernatants of MG-63 cells (c) or ROB cells (f) was detected by ELISA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared with vehicle control; ##P < 0.01 compared with CoCl2.
Figure 3Protective effect of SAL against the CoCl2-induced loss of cell mineralization in ROB cells and reduction in Osterix and Runx2 expression in MG-63 and ROB cells.
(a) SAL promoted ROB cell mineralization. After pre-treatment with either SAL (10 or 100 nM) or vehicle, followed by treatment with CoCl2 for 24 h, primary rat osteoblasts were induced using beta-glycerol phosphate and ascorbic acid. After the cells were cultured for 18 days, the number of mineralized bone nodules was quantified by Alizarin Red S staining (Original section, 100×).The white arrows show mineralized nodules. The absorbance of the released Alizarin Red S stain was measured at 570 nm. (b) SAL promoted Osterix and Runx2 mRNA expression in MG-63 cells.(c) SAL increased Osterix and Runx2 protein expression in MG-63 cells. (d) SAL promoted Osterix and Runx2 mRNA expression in ROB cells. (e) SAL increased Osterix and Runx2 protein expression in ROB cells. MG-63 or ROB cells were cultured in 1% FBS in the presence of either SAL (1, 10, 100 or 1000 nM) or vehicle, followed by treatment with CoCl2 for 48 h. The mRNA and protein levels of Osterix and Runx2 were examined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot. **P < 0.01 compared with vehicle control; #P < 0.05 compared with CoCl2.
Figure 4Effects of SAL on components of the HIF-1α pathway in MG-63 cells in a hypoxic environment.
(a) Detection of the mRNA levels of HIF-1α, pVHL and VEGF by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. (b) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and pVHL protein expression. The numbers below the lanes indicate the levels of mRNA or protein expression compared with the control levels. (c) The level of VEGF secretion into the cell culture supernatants was analysed by ELISA. (d) Effect of SAL on the transcriptional activity of HIF-1α. The relative luciferase activity level was measured and normalized to the enzymatic activity level of β-galactosidase. (e) Effect of SAL on the translocation of HIF-1α. After culturing in the presence of 100 nM SAL or vehicle followed by treatment with CoCl2 for 24 h, MG-63 cells were treated as described in the Methods section. Then, the nuclear localization of HIF-1α was observed via confocal microscopy. The position of the cell nucleus was confirmed by staining with DAPI (blue), and HIF-1α expression was detected as FITC staining (green) (Original section, 400×). **P < 0.01 compared with vehicle control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with CoCl2.
Figure 5Effects of SAL on the serum levels of minerals and bone biochemical markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and bone weight in OVX rats.
(a) ALP. (b) BGP. (c) E2. (d) Serum Ca. (e) Serum P. (f) BMD. (g) Wet weight/volume. (h) Dry weight/volume. (i) Ash weight/volume. The data are presented as themeans ± SD (n = 9 per group). **P < 0.01 compared with the sham control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with the OVX group. The OVX model was established in female Wistar rats as described in the Methods section. After treatment with SAL or RLX, the rats were sacrificed at 12 weeks after surgery.
Figure 6Effects of SAL on the histomorphology of the proximal femur in OVX rats.
Von Kossa staining of femurs (a1–a5:40×; b1–b5:400×). The black arrows show osteoids of the proximal femur. (c) Percent trabecular area (Tb.Ar). (d) Trabecular thickness (Tb.Th). (e) Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). (f) Trabecular number (Tb.N). (g) Osteoid surfaces (OS). (h) Osteoid width (O.Wi). (i) Osteoid volume (OV).The data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 9 per group). **P < 0.01 compared with the sham control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with the OVX group.
Figure 7Effects of SAL on the histomorphology of the proximal femur in OVX rats.
(a1–a5, a) Double labelling in the endplate region was used to calculate the mineral apposition rate (MAR) in each femur region (100×). The white arrows show tetracycline double labelling of the femur region. (b1–b5, b) Giemsa staining of the femur was used to calculate the osteoblast absorption surfaces (Ob.S). The black arrows show osteoblasts. (c1–c5, c) Microscopic images of sections stained with immunohistochemisty of Runx2 antibody (200×) and effects of SAL on Runx2 expression in OVX rats. (d1–d5, d) Microscopic images of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining femur section (100×) and the statistical result of number of osteoclasts. The data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 9 per group). **P < 0.01 compared with the sham control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with the OVX group.
Figure 8Effects of SAL on the biomechanical parameters of femurs in OVX rats.
(a–f) Structural mechanics (fracture displacement, fracture load, fracture energy, yield displacement, yield load, and yield energy). (g–i) Material mechanics (modulus of elasticity, fracture stress, and fracture strain). The data are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 9 per group). **P < 0.01 compared with the sham control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared with the OVX group.
Figure 9Effects of SAL on Hypoxyprobe-1 staining intensity and HIF-1α, VEGF and CD31 expression in OVX rats.
Representative sections stained with Hypoxyprobe-1 or antibodies against HIF-1α, VEGF and CD31 are shown (the blue arrows, 400×). Quantitative measurements of the staining intensity of Hypoxyprobe-1 (a1–a5, a) and the expression levels of HIF-1α (b1–b5, b), VEGF (c1–c5, c) and CD31 (d1–d5, d) are shown. The data are presented as the means ± SD. **P < 0.01 compared with the sham group; ##P < 0.01 compared with the OVX group.