Literature DB >> 27558707

Chromosomal rearrangements in holocentric organisms lead to reproductive isolation by hybrid dysfunction: The correlation between karyotype rearrangements and germination rates in sedges.

Marcial Escudero1, Marlene Hahn2, Bethany H Brown2, Kate Lueders2, Andrew L Hipp3.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Understanding the drivers of speciation is a central task of evolutionary biology. Chromosomal rearrangements are known to play an important role in species diversification, but the role of rearrangements of holocentric chromosomes-chromosomes without localized centromeres-is poorly understood.
METHODS: We made numerous artificial crosses between Carex scoparia individuals of different diploid chromosome numbers and, for comparison, between individuals of the same chromosome number. We studied chromosome pairing and chromosomal rearrangements in the F1 individuals using light microscopy. We then estimated germination rates as a function of geographic distance, genetic distance, chromosome number differences in parents, and pairing irregularities in F1 individuals, using generalized least squares to fit alternative regression models. KEY
RESULTS: The most informative predictors of germination rates in the F1 generation are chromosome number differences and minimum number of chromosome pairing irregularities in the F1 individuals. Genetic and geographic distances between parents are not significant predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Holocentric chromosomal rearrangements play an important role in postzygotic reproductive isolation in Carex through F1 hybrid inviability and sterility. Hybrid dysfunction seems to be a suitable model for chromosomal speciation when there are several chromosomal rearrangements between parents. However, we have not tested the hypothesis that genome rearrangements may also play an important role in suppressing recombination between cytogenetically divergent populations.
© 2016 Botanical Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome counts; chromosomal speciation; drivers of diversification; generalized least squares; germination rates; holocentric chromosomes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27558707     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1600051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  6 in total

Review 1.  Speciation through chromosomal fusion and fission in Lepidoptera.

Authors:  Jurriaan M de Vos; Hannah Augustijnen; Livio Bätscher; Kay Lucek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparison of the genetic relationship between nine Cephalopod species based on cluster analysis of karyotype evolutionary distance.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Xiao-Dong Zheng
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 3.  Epigenetics as an Evolutionary Tool for Centromere Flexibility.

Authors:  Laura Leo; Marcella Marchetti; Simona Giunta; Laura Fanti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Chromosome numbers of Carex (Cyperaceae) and their taxonomic implications.

Authors:  Helena Więcław; Anna Kalinka; Jacob Koopman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chromosome-scale genome assemblies and annotations for Poales species Carex cristatella, Carex scoparia, Juncus effusus, and Juncus inflexus.

Authors:  Jose Planta; Yu-Ya Liang; Haoyang Xin; Matthew T Chansler; L Alan Prather; Ning Jiang; Jiming Jiang; Kevin L Childs
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.542

6.  Chromosome number evolves at equal rates in holocentric and monocentric clades.

Authors:  Sarah N Ruckman; Michelle M Jonika; Claudio Casola; Heath Blackmon
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.917

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.