| Literature DB >> 27558702 |
Qiliang Zuo1,2,3, Shifeier Lu3, Zhibin Du3, Thor Friis3, Jiangwu Yao2, Ross Crawford3,4, Indira Prasadam5,6, Yin Xiao7,8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although articular cartilage is the primary tissues affected by osteoarthritis (OA), the underlying subchondral bone also undergoes noticeable changes. Despite the growing body of research into the biophysical and mechanical properties of OA bone there are few studies that have analysed the structure of the subchondral sclerosis at the nanoscale. In this study, the composition and nano-structural changes of human osteoarthritis (OA) subchondral bone were investigated to better understand the site-specific changes.Entities:
Keywords: Bone hierarchical structure; Ca/P; Crystallinity; Nano-structure; Osteoarthritis; Subchondral bone
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27558702 PMCID: PMC4997740 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1226-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Representative X-ray, macroscopic histology, μCT and backscatter SEM images of OA samples. (a) X-ray showing joint space narrowing and the non-sclerotic and sclerotic region of OA subchondral bone; H&E and Safranin-O staining of OA samples graded according to the disease severity. (b) Mankin scoring was performed to assess the disease severity of grade 1 and grade IV samples. N = 10 separate samples. * P represents that the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). (c) μCT images of OA samples graded according to disease severity, 3D and 2D view of grade I OA bone compared to grade IV OA bone. Von Kossa staining of grade I OA subchondral bone and grade IV OA bone. Scale bar = 100 μm. (d) Quantitative μCT results show grade IV subchondral bone plate has a higher bone volume fraction compared to grade I specimens. N = 5 separate samples. * P represents that the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). (e) Resin embedded grade I OA samples showing a distinct boundary between articular cartilage and subchondral bone compared to grade IV OA samples and backscatter SEM images of grade I OA bone vs. grade IV OA subchondral bone. Black spots (white arrow heads) indicate the position of the dividing line between cartilage and bone. The border between subchondral bone plate and trabecular bone was distinguished by the bone plate arrangement (yellow arrows). TEM slices were “lifted out” of the representative positions in bone sample (yellow rectangles). Scale bar = 100 μm. C: articular cartilage; S: subchondral bone plate; T: trabecular bone
Fig. 2TEM and SEAD imaging of thin unstained sections from the grade I OA and the grade IV OA subchondral bone plate in correlation to EDS analysis. (a) Characteristic fibril banding patterns were seen in the grade I OA subchondral bone plate. (b) The grade IV bone showed an electron dense region lacking a hierarchal structure (left rectangle) combined with a cross-banding pattern in the remaining regions (right rectangle). (c) High magnification of the selected area in image "a" shows faint bands (white arrows) which were perpendicular to the long axis of fibril (blue arrow). Clusters of linear features with a distinct profile (yellow arrow head) could be seen. (d) High magnification “non-structured” region. (e) High magnification of the fibril-banding pattern region in the grade IV bone showed fibrils with amorphous darker bands (white arrows) and the intensified electron dense spread to whole fibril along with its long axis (blue arrow) which exhibited non-hierarchical structure (black arrows). (f) SEAD pattern of the grade I OA bone, blue arrow indicates the c-axis orientation of carbonated HA within the tissue. (g) SEAD pattern shows weakened diffraction of high density region in the grade IV OA bone. (h) SEAD pattern shows weakened diffraction of cross-banding patterned region in the grade IV OA bone. (i) EDS spectra of the grade I OA bone. (j) EDS spectra of the high density region in the grade IV OA bone. (k) EDS spectra for the cross-banding patterned region in the grade IV OA bone. The images are representative of 5 different patient samples graded according to the disease severity
Fig. 3TEM and SEAD images of thin unstained sections from the grade I OA and the grade IV OA trabecular bone correlated with the corresponding EDS analysis. (a) Characteristic fibril banding patterns are seen in grade I OA trabecular bone. (b) The grade IV bone shows a region of high electron density lacking a hierarchal structure (left rectangle), combined with cross-banding patterns in the remaining regions (right rectangle). (c) High magnification of selected area in image "a" show faint bands (black arrows) which are perpendicular to the long axis of fibril (blue arrow). Clusters of linear features with a distinct profile can be seen (yellow arrow heads). (d) High magnification of a region with indistinct structure showed a possible long axis of fibrils (blue arrow) and completely mineralized fibrils (white arrows) next to the electron dense region. (e) High magnification of the cross-banding pattern region in the grade IV bone shows fibrils with wide darker bands (black arrows) and with increasing electron density spread to whole fibrils along the long axis (blue arrow) which exhibited non-hierarchical structures (white arrows); discrete dark features were identified with amorphous profile (yellow arrowheads). (f) SEAD pattern of the grade I OA bone, blue arrow indicates the preferential c-axis orientation of carbonated HA within the tissue. (g) SEAD pattern of high dense region in the grade IV OA bone, blue arrow indicated the predominant c-axis orientation of carbonated HA within the tissue. (h) SEAD pattern of cross-banding pattern region in the grade IV OA bone, blue arrow indicates the predominant c-axis orientation of carbonated HA within the tissue. (i) EDS spectra of the grade I OA bone. (j) EDS spectra of the high density region in the grade IV OA bone. (k) EDS spectra of the banding pattern region in the grade IV OA bone. The images are representative of 5 different patient samples graded according to the disease severity
Fig. 4HR-TEM and SAED correlated with EDS spectrum images of freshly extracted minerals from grade I (a, c, e) and grade IV OA sourced trabecular bone (b, d, f). (a, b) Nano-particles of minerals extracted from (a) grade I and (b) grade IV OA trabeculae. (c, d) SAED pattern of mineral particles from (d) grade IV OA trabeculae exhibited higher intensity diffraction rings than the (c) grade I OA trabeculae. (e, f) EDS spectra for the nano-mineral particles from the (e) grade I and the (f) grade IV OA trabeculae. The images are representative of 5 different patient samples graded according to the disease severity
Fig. 5FTIR-ATR spectra of freshly extracted mineral particles from the grade I and the grade IV OA trabecular bone. The splitting factor (SF) was calculated by the formula inset. The images are representative of 5 different patient samples graded according to the disease severity
Fig. 6(a and b) show the microstructures in polished bone samples. O: osteon; L: lamellae. (c) shows the load–displacement curve of bone samples. The images are representative of 10 different patient samples graded according to the disease severity
Average elastic module and hardness values of resin, the grade I and the grade IV trabecular bone. Values (mean ± SD) with different superscript letters (a vs b vs c) and different superscript symbols (* vs △ vs □) in the same row were significant difference (one-way ANOVA analysis and SNK-q test, P < 0.05). E: Elastic modulus; H: Hardness
| Resin | Osteon | Lamellae | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade I | Grade IV | Grade I | Grade IV | ||
| E (GPa) | 3.35 ± 0.23a,* | 13.46 ± 2.41b | 16.00 ± 2.60c | 13.90 ± 2.75△ | 17.33 ± 3.13□ |
| H (GPa) | 0.16 ± 0.02a,* | 0.46 ± 0.12b | 0.55 ± 0.14c | 0.53 ± 0.14△ | 0.62 ± 0.10□ |