Literature DB >> 27558662

An assessment of the variation in the concentration of acetylcysteine in infusions for the treatment of paracetamol overdose.

George P Bailey1,2, David M Wood1,3, John R H Archer1,3, Edmund Rab4, Robert J Flanagan4,5, Paul I Dargan1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous acetylcysteine is the treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning. A previous UK study in 2001 found that 39% of measured acetylcysteine infusion concentrations differed by >20% from anticipated concentrations. In 2012, the UK Commission on Human Medicines made recommendations for the management of paracetamol overdose, including provision of weight-based acetylcysteine dosing tables. The aim of this study was to assess variation in acetylcysteine concentrations in administered infusions following the introduction of this guidance.
METHODS: A 6-month single-centre prospective study was undertaken at a UK teaching hospital. After preparation, 5-ml samples were taken from the first, second and third/any subsequent acetylcysteine infusions. Acetylcysteine was measured in diluted (1:50) samples by high-performance liquid chromatography. Comparisons between measured and expected concentrations based on prescribed weight-based dose and volume were made for each infusion.
RESULTS: Ninety samples were collected. There was a variation of ≤10% in measured compared to expected concentration for 45 (50%) infusions, of 10-20% for 27 (30%) infusions, 20.1-50% for 14 (16%) infusions and >50% for four (4%) infusions. There was a median (interquartile range) variation in measured compared to expected concentration of -3.6 mg ml-1 (-6.7 to -2.3) for the first infusion, +0.2 mg ml-1 (-0.9 to +0.4) for the second infusion and -0.3 mg ml-1 (-0.6 to +0.2) for third and fourth infusions.
CONCLUSION: There has been a moderate improvement in the variation in acetylcysteine dose administered by infusion. Further work is required to understand the continuing variation and consideration should be given to simplification of acetylcysteine regimes to decrease the risk of administration errors.
© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acetaminophen; acetylcysteine; drug overdose; intravenous infusions; medication errors; paracetamol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27558662      PMCID: PMC5237694          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  27 in total

1.  Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors.

Authors:  Katja Taxis; Nick Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

2.  Anaphylactoid response to intravenous acetylcysteine.

Authors:  W Sunman; A D Hughes; P S Sever
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A potentially fatal prescribing error in the treatment of paracetamol poisoning.

Authors:  Mark Little; Lindsay Murray; David McCoubrie; Frank F S Daly
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of N-acetylcysteine in aqueous formulations.

Authors:  J Farquhar; G Finlay; P A Ford; M Martin-Smith
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.935

5.  Systematic evaluation of errors occurring during the preparation of intravenous medication.

Authors:  Christopher S Parshuram; Teresa To; Winnie Seto; Angela Trope; Gideon Koren; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Random and systematic medication errors in routine clinical practice: a multicentre study of infusions, using acetylcysteine as an example.

Authors:  R E Ferner; N J Langford; C Anton; A Hutchings; D N Bateman; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Status epilepticus after a massive intravenous N-acetylcysteine overdose leading to intracranial hypertension and death.

Authors:  Benoit Bailey; René Blais; Anne Letarte
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Frequency of medication errors with intravenous acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose.

Authors:  Bryan D Hayes; Wendy Klein-Schwartz; Suzanne Doyon
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Self-harm in England: a tale of three cities. Multicentre study of self-harm.

Authors:  Keith Hawton; Helen Bergen; Deborah Casey; Sue Simkin; Ben Palmer; Jayne Cooper; Nav Kapur; Judith Horrocks; Allan House; Rachael Lilley; Rachael Noble; David Owens
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Weight-based N-acetylcysteine dosing chart to minimise the risk of calculation errors in prescribing and preparing N-acetylcysteine infusions for adults presenting with paracetamol overdose in the emergency department.

Authors:  V A Selvan; S H S Calvert; G Cavell; E Glucksman; M Kerins; J Gonzalez
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  4 in total

1.  An evaluation of the role of mixing techniques in the observed variation in acetylcysteine infusion concentrations.

Authors:  Kerry Layne; Louise Hope; Edmund Rab; John Archer; David M Wood; Paul I Dargan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A comment on 'An assessment of the variation in the concentrations of acetylcysteine in infusions for the treatment of paracetamol overdose'.

Authors:  Lauren O'Grady; Michael E Mullins; Evan S Schwarz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  N-Acetylcysteine Interference with a Glucose Dehydrogenase Linked Glucose Meter.

Authors:  Martha E Lyon; Andrew W Lyon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-14

4.  γ-glutamylcysteine exhibits anti-inflammatory effects by increasing cellular glutathione level.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Ling Li; Qiyun Hang; Yuan Fang; Xiaoliang Dong; Peng Cao; Zhimin Yin; Lan Luo
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 11.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.