Literature DB >> 27557450

Mismatch Between Proximal Rod Contouring and Proximal Junctional Angle: A Predisposed Risk Factor for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Degenerative Scoliosis.

Peng Yan1, Hongda Bao, Yong Qiu, Mike Bao, Jeffrey J Varghese, Xu Sun, Zhen Liu, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Minghao Zheng, Feng Zhu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the mismatch between proximal junctional angle (PJA) and the proximal rod contouring contributed to the occurrence of postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in degenerative scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJK is one of the complications in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis, the postoperative PI-LL mismatch and the increased rod stiffness are supposed to be the etiology of PJK. However, the impact of rod contouring on PJK has not been fully illustrated.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 27 consecutive degenerative scoliosis patients (three males and 24 females) who underwent corrective surgery with more than 2-year follow-up. Radiographic parameters included proximal rod contouring angle (PRCA) and PJA at the three time-points. The subjects were divided into two groups: PJK group and non-PJK group with the definition of PJK as a PJA more than 10°. The mismatch between PRCA and post-op PJA, defined as the difference between PRCA and postop PJA of more than 5°, was then compared with PJK and non-PJK group.
RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 60.48 ± 6.47 years old with a mean Cobb angle of 40.89 ± 14.33°. Twelve patients, with a mean PJA of 18.67 ± 5.31° at the last followup, were stratified into the PJK group, while the remaining 15 patients, with a mean PJA of 5.33 ± 2.47, were placed into the non-PJK group. A significant difference in the mismatch between post-op PJA and PRCA was observed between PJK and non-PJK group (8.83 ± 5.07° vs. 4.07 ± 2.91°, P = 0.005). Meanwhile the difference of mismatch between preop PJA and PRCA showed no statistical significance (5.16 ± 4.24° vs. 3.00 ± 2.48°, P = 0.109).
CONCLUSION: Mismatch between rod contouring and postoperative proximal spinal curve may be a predisposed risk factor for PJK in degenerative scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27557450     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis after internal fixation for adult spinal deformity: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kai Chen; Ming Li; Yanghu Lu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled "Type V osteogenesis imperfecta undergoing surgical correction for scoliosis" by M. Jones et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi 10.1007/s00586-018-5465-8).

Authors:  C Birkenmaier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical Effects of Proximal Polyetheretherketone Rod Extension on the Upper Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in a Human Long-Segment Construct: A Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Jennifer N Lehrman; Anna G U Sawa; Piyanat Wangsawatwong; Jakub Godzik; David S Xu; Jay D Turner; Brian P Kelly; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

4.  Surgical, Radiographic, and Patient-Related Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun S Kim; Kevin Phan; Zoe B Cheung; Nam Lee; Luilly Vargas; Varun Arvind; Robert K Merrill; Sunder Gidumal; John Di Capua; Samuel Overley; James Dowdell; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-06-25

5.  Lumbar lordosis morphology correlates to pelvic incidence and erector spinae muscularity.

Authors:  Yang Li; Jianmin Sun; Guodong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Surgical outcomes in children under 10 years old in the treatment of congenital scoliosis due to single nonincarcerated thoracolumbar hemivertebra: according to the age at surgery.

Authors:  Haixia Li; Zhiming Chen; Bo Gao; Jiaxu Wang; Shuilin Shao; Jigong Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Wang; Yuan-Qing Shen; Yan Wu; Jun Li; Zhen Liu; Jian-Kun Xu; Qi-Xin Chen; Wei-Shan Chen; Lin-Wei Chen; Ning Zhang; Fang-Cai Li
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Change in the Alignment and Distal Junctional Kyphosis Development after Posterior Cervical Spinal Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy - Risk Factor Analysis.

Authors:  Jung Jae Lee; Jin Hoon Park; Young Gyu Oh; Hong Kyung Shin; Byong Gon Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-05-03

9.  Transpedicular-Transdiscal Cement Augmentation Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fusion Proximal Junctional Failure.

Authors:  Mary K Jesse; Andrew W Cleveland; Michael J Reiter; Vikas V Patel; Christopher J Kleck
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

10.  The Hybrid Open Muscle-Sparing Approach in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Undergoing Lower Thoracic Fusion to the Pelvis.

Authors:  Paul J Park; Joe M Lombardi; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.