Literature DB >> 27556603

Phalloplasty: A Review of Techniques and Outcomes.

Shane D Morrison1, Afaaf Shakir, Krishna S Vyas, Johanna Kirby, Curtis N Crane, Gordon K Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acquired or congenital absence of the penis can lead to severe physical limitations and psychological outcomes. Phallic reconstruction can restore various functional aspects of the penis and reduce psychosocial sequelae. Moreover, some female-to-male transsexuals desire creation of a phallus as part of their gender transition. Because of the complexity of phalloplasty, there is not an ideal technique for every patient. This review sets out to identify and critically appraise the current literature on phalloplasty techniques and outcomes.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for studies published through July of 2015 with multiple search terms related to phalloplasty. Data on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 248 articles were selected and reviewed from the 790 identified. Articles covered a variety of techniques on phalloplasty. Three thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients underwent phalloplasty, with a total of 1753 complications reported, although many articles did not explicitly comment on complications. One hundred four patients underwent penile replantation and two underwent penile transplantation. Satisfaction was high, although most studies did not use validated or quantified approaches to address satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Phalloplasty techniques are evolving to include a number of different flaps, and most techniques have high reported satisfaction rates. Penile replantation and transplantation are also options for amputation or loss of phallus. Further studies are required to better compare different techniques to more robustly establish best practices. However, based on these studies, it appears that phalloplasty is highly efficacious and beneficial to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27556603     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  21 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques of phalloplasty in transgender patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Boczar; Maria T Huayllani; Humza Y Saleem; Gabriela Cinotto; Francisco R Avila; Salam Kassis; Xiaona Lu; Brian D Rinker; Antonio J Forte
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 2.  Single versus two-stage phalloplasty for transgender female-to-male patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Maria T Huayllani; Daniel Boczar; Humza Y Saleem; Gabriela Cinotto; Francisco R Avila; Oscar J Manrique; Pedro Ciudad; Brian D Rinker; Antonio J Forte
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

3.  Fasciocutaneous flap reinforcement of ventral onlay buccal mucosa grafts enables neophallus revision urethroplasty.

Authors:  Stelios C Wilson; John T Stranix; Kiranpreet Khurana; Shane D Morrison; Jamie P Levine; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 4.  An overview of female-to-male gender-confirming surgery.

Authors:  Shane D Morrison; Mang L Chen; Curtis N Crane
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  [Gender confirming surgery : Female-to-male and male-to-female].

Authors:  M Sohn; U M Rieger; J Heß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Surgery in 2017: Moving towards successful penile transplantation programmes.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Campbell; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  [Reconstructive surgery in penile cancer].

Authors:  M Sohn; M Dietrich; A Wirthmann; U M Rieger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Urethral lithiasis after phalloplasty.

Authors:  Mário José Pereira-Lourenço; Miguel Eliseu; Paulo Temido; Arnaldo Figueiredo
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-12

Review 9.  Review of penile reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Sverrir Kristinsson; Mark Johnson; David Ralph
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 10.  Reconstructive Management Pearls for the Transgender Patient.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Jeff Sun; Michael A Granieri; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.