Importance: Significant differences have been described between women and men regarding presentation, mechanism, and treatment outcome of certain arrhythmias. Previous studies of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not included sufficient women for meaningful comparison. Objective: To compare outcomes between women and men with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational study performed between 2002 and 2013, conducted by the International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group, consisting of 12 high-volume ablation centers. Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation were studied. Structural heart disease was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 55%, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or right ventricular cardiomyopathy, with scar confirmed during electroanatomic mapping. Exposures: Catheter ablation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ventricular tachycardia-free survival and transplant-free survival were compared between women and men. Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed. Results: Of 2062 patients undergoing ablation, 266 (12.9%) were women. Mean (SD) age was 62.4 (13.3) years and 1095 (53.1%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Compared with men, women were younger, with higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less VT storm. Despite this, women had higher rates of 1-year VT recurrence following ablation (30.5% vs 25.3%; P = .03). This difference was only partially explained by higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy among women and was actually most pronounced among those with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Conclusions and Relevance: In 12 high-volume ablation centers, women with structural heart disease have worse VT-free survival following ablation than men. Whether this is owing to differences in referral pattern, arrhythmia substrate, or undertreatment requires further study.
Importance: Significant differences have been described between women and men regarding presentation, mechanism, and treatment outcome of certain arrhythmias. Previous studies of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation have not included sufficient women for meaningful comparison. Objective: To compare outcomes between women and men with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational study performed between 2002 and 2013, conducted by the International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group, consisting of 12 high-volume ablation centers. Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing VT ablation were studied. Structural heart disease was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 55%, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or right ventricular cardiomyopathy, with scar confirmed during electroanatomic mapping. Exposures: Catheter ablation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ventricular tachycardia-free survival and transplant-free survival were compared between women and men. Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed. Results: Of 2062 patients undergoing ablation, 266 (12.9%) were women. Mean (SD) age was 62.4 (13.3) years and 1095 (53.1%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Compared with men, women were younger, with higher left ventricular ejection fraction and less VT storm. Despite this, women had higher rates of 1-year VT recurrence following ablation (30.5% vs 25.3%; P = .03). This difference was only partially explained by higher prevalence of nonischemic cardiomyopathy among women and was actually most pronounced among those with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Conclusions and Relevance: In 12 high-volume ablation centers, women with structural heart disease have worse VT-free survival following ablation than men. Whether this is owing to differences in referral pattern, arrhythmia substrate, or undertreatment requires further study.
Authors: Pasquale Vergara; Wendy S Tzou; Roderick Tung; Chiara Brombin; Alessandro Nonis; Marmar Vaseghi; David S Frankel; Luigi Di Biase; Usha Tedrow; Nilesh Mathuria; Shiro Nakahara; Venkat Tholakanahalli; T Jared Bunch; J Peter Weiss; Timm Dickfeld; Dhanunjaya Lakireddy; J David Burkhardt; Pasquale Santangeli; David Callans; Andrea Natale; Francis Marchlinski; William G Stevenson; Kalyanam Shivkumar; William H Sauer; Paolo Della Bella Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-12
Authors: Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Marcio Jansen de Oliveira Figueiredo; Alireza Sepehri Shamloo; Alberto Alfie; Serge Boveda; Nikolaos Dagres; Dario Di Toro; Lee L Eckhardt; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Carina Hardy; Takanori Ikeda; Aparna Jaswal; Elizabeth Kaufman; Andrew Krahn; Kengo Kusano; Valentina Kutyifa; Han S Lim; Gregory Y H Lip; Santiago Nava-Townsend; Hui-Nam Pak; Gerardo Rodríguez Diez; William Sauer; Anil Saxena; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Diego Vanegas; Marmar Vaseghi; Arthur Wilde; T Jared Bunch; Alfred E Buxton; Gonzalo Calvimontes; Tze-Fan Chao; Lars Eckardt; Heidi Estner; Anne M Gillis; Rodrigo Isa; Josef Kautzner; Philippe Maury; Joshua D Moss; Gi-Byung Nam; Brian Olshansky; Luis Fernando Pava Molano; Mauricio Pimentel; Mukund Prabhu; Wendy S Tzou; Philipp Sommer; Janice Swampillai; Alejandro Vidal; Thomas Deneke; Gerhard Hindricks; Christophe Leclercq Journal: Europace Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Nishaki K Mehta; Christopher Schumann; Giovanni Davogustto; Andrew Cluckey; Evan Harmon; Joshua France; James M Mangrum; Pamela Mason; Sula Mazimba; Rohit Malhotra; Kenneth Bilchick; Andrew Darby; Michael Salerno; Christopher M Kramer; William Stevenson Journal: J Innov Card Rhythm Manag Date: 2022-03-15
Authors: Indranill Basu-Ray; Dibbendhu Khanra; Sumit K Shah; Anindya Mukherjee; Sudhanva V Char; Bhavna Jain; T Jared Bunch; Michael Gold; Adedayo A Adeboye; Mohammad Saeed Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 1.976