Literature DB >> 27556293

Options in treating trigeminal neuralgia: Experience with 195 patients.

Patrick W Hitchon1, Marshall Holland2, Jennifer Noeller2, Mark C Smith3, Toshio Moritani4, Nivedita Jerath5, Wenzhuan He6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For patients with medically unresponsive trigeminal neuralgia (TN), surgical options include microvascular decompression (MVD), radiofrequency rhizotomy (RF), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). In an attempt to identify the risks and benefits and cost inherent with each of the three modalities, we performed a retrospective review of our experience with 195 cases of TN treated over the past 15 years.
METHODS: Since 2001, 195 patients with previously untreated TN were managed: with MVD in 79, RF in 36, and SRS in 80. All patients reported herein underwent preoperative MRI. Women outnumbered men 122/73 (p=0.045). Follow-up after surgery was 32±46months.
RESULTS: The patients qualifying for MVD were generally healthier and younger, with a mean age±SD of 57±14, compared to those undergoing RF (75±15) or SRS (73±13, p<0.0001). In case of relapse, medical treatment was always tried and failed prior to consideration of surgical intervention. A second surgical procedure was necessary in 2, 23, and 18 patients initially treated with MVD, RF, and SRS respectively (p<0.0001). In the patients treated with MVD, RF, and SRS, the average number of procedures per patient necessary to achieve pain control was 1.1, 2.0, and 1.3 respectively (p=0.001). There were 7 complications in the patients treated with MVD but no deaths. Numbness was present in 13, 18, and 29 patients treated with MVD, RF, and SRS respectively (p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: MVD for TN is the treatment least likely to fail or require additional treatment. Patients who underwent MVD were younger than those undergoing RF or SRS. The highest rate of recurrence of TN was encountered in patients undergoing RF (64%). Facial numbness was least likely to occur with MVD (16%) compared to RF and SRS (50% and 36% respectively).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microvascular decompression; Radiofrequency rhizotomy; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Trigeminal neuralgia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27556293     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  9 in total

1.  An Improved Rodent Model of Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain by Unilateral Chronic Constriction Injury of Distal Infraorbital Nerve.

Authors:  Weihua Ding; Zerong You; Shiqian Shen; Jinsheng Yang; Grewo Lim; Jason T Doheny; Lucy Chen; Shengmei Zhu; Jianren Mao
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Evaluation of serum vitamin B12 levels and its correlation with clinical presentation in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Pooja Dhole; Vidya Lohe; Rahul Bhowate; Shailesh M Gondivkar; Ravindra Kadu; Swapnil C Mohod; Ravikant V Sune
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-09-27

3.  Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes of Microvascular Decompression for Mixed Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Adela Wu; Tina Doshi; Alice Hung; Tomas Garzon-Muvdi; Matthew T Bender; Chetan Bettegowda; Michael Lim
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Congyang Yan; Qianxi Zhang; Cheng Liu; Jiali Yang; Hu Bian; Jun Zhu; Tongqing Xue
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  The Current Status of Microvascular Decompression for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia in Japan: An Analysis of 1619 Patients Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Mizobuchi; Makoto Ohtani; Junichiro Satomi; Kiyohide Fushimi; Shinya Matsuda; Shinji Nagahiro
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  After microvascular decompression to treat trigeminal neuralgia, both immediate pain relief and recurrence rates are higher in patients with arterial compression than with venous compression.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Xiaoyan Gu; Guan Sun; Jun Guo; Xin Lin; Shuguang Zhang; Chunfa Qian
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-04

7.  Microvascular decompression and radiofrequency for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Li; Liqiang Yang; Jiaxiang Ni; Zhi Dou
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 8.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27

9.  Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Imran Noorani; Amanda Lodge; Andrew Durnford; Girish Vajramani; Owen Sparrow
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.216

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.