| Literature DB >> 27555310 |
Jennifer Hiras1, Yu-Wei Wu1, Kai Deng2, Carrie D Nicora3, Joshua T Aldrich4, Dario Frey5, Sebastian Kolinko1, Errol W Robinson4, Jon M Jacobs3, Paul D Adams1, Trent R Northen1, Blake A Simmons1, Steven W Singer6.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are key enzymes in the depolymerization of plant-derived cellulose, a process central to the global carbon cycle and the conversion of plant biomass to fuels and chemicals. A limited number of GH families hydrolyze crystalline cellulose, often by a processive mechanism along the cellulose chain. During cultivation of thermophilic cellulolytic microbial communities, substantial differences were observed in the crystalline cellulose saccharification activities of supernatants recovered from divergent lineages. Comparative community proteomics identified a set of cellulases from a population closely related to actinobacterium Thermobispora bispora that were highly abundant in the most active consortium. Among the cellulases from T. bispora, the abundance of a GH family 12 (GH12) protein correlated most closely with the changes in crystalline cellulose hydrolysis activity. This result was surprising since GH12 proteins have been predominantly characterized as enzymes active on soluble polysaccharide substrates. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of the suite of T. bispora hydrolytic cellulases confirmed that the GH12 protein possessed the highest activity on multiple crystalline cellulose substrates and demonstrated that it hydrolyzes cellulose chains by a predominantly random mechanism. This work suggests that the role of GH12 proteins in crystalline cellulose hydrolysis by cellulolytic microbes should be reconsidered. IMPORTANCE: Cellulose is the most abundant organic polymer on earth, and its enzymatic hydrolysis is a key reaction in the global carbon cycle and the conversion of plant biomass to biofuels. The glycoside hydrolases that depolymerize crystalline cellulose have been primarily characterized from isolates. In this study, we demonstrate that adapting microbial consortia from compost to grow on crystalline cellulose generated communities whose soluble enzymes exhibit differential abilities to hydrolyze crystalline cellulose. Comparative proteomics of these communities identified a protein of glycoside hydrolase family 12 (GH12), a family of proteins previously observed to primarily hydrolyze soluble substrates, as a candidate that accounted for some of the differences in hydrolytic activities. Heterologous expression confirmed that the GH12 protein identified by proteomics was active on crystalline cellulose and hydrolyzed cellulose by a random mechanism, in contrast to most cellulases that act on the crystalline polymer in a processive mechanism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27555310 PMCID: PMC4999548 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01106-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
Cellulase and hemicellulase activities recovered from thermophilic bacterial communities adapted to microcrystalline cellulose
| Passage | Sp act (U/mg) on substrate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CMC | pNPC | pNPG | |
| 2A | 1.26 ± 0.29 | 466.0 ± 92.7 | 57.6 ± 4.1 |
| 2B | 0.29 ± 1.42 | 23.2 ± 0.7 | 114.0 ± 9.2 |
| 3A | 1.42 ± 0.06 | 502.1 ± 5.1 | 21.0 ± 1.0 |
| 3B | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 36.0 ± 1.9 | 457.5 ± 0.4 |
Bacterial supernatants were assayed with the substrates CMC, pNPG, and pNPC. Specific activities are based on protein concentrations obtained using the BCA method. Three replicates were performed, and the ranges represent the standard deviation from the mean. The activities represented by each substrate are described in Materials and Methods.
For CMC, 1 U represents 1 μmol sugar released min−1 ml−1 of supernatant.
For pNPC, 1 U represents 1 μmol p-nitrophenol released min−1 mg−1 protein.
FIG 1 Saccharification of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) with MCC-adapted culture supernatants at 60°C after 72 h. Supernatants were collected from each culture and incubated with 2% (wt/vol) Avicel. Enzyme loading was set at 5 mg enzyme/g glucan as measured by the BCA assay. Glucose and cellobiose were measured by HPLC. Error bars represent standard deviations from the mean from three technical replicates.
FIG 2 (A) Relative metagenomic, (B) metaproteomic abundances, and (C) glycoside hydrolase metaproteomic abundances of the adapted communities. The metagenomic and metaproteomic abundances were normalized to 100% for each sample. Different colors indicate different draft genomes obtained from binning of the metagenomic assembly. For clarity, only draft genomes with at least 10% relative abundance in any of the metagenomic samples are displayed; all other draft genomes are summarized by “Other.”
FIG 3 Heat map representing the proteomic abundances of the T. bispora cellulases (the GH12, GH6_exo, GH48, GH6_endo, and AA10 proteins) as measured by LC-MS/MS-based iTRAQ quantification. Lighter colors indicate lower log proteomic abundances of each cellulase in four different samples, and darker colors indicate higher log abundances. Pas2 and Pas3 represent supernatants recovered from passage 2 and passage 3 of each culture lineage, respectively.
FIG 4 Production of cellobiose from Avicel by T. bispora cellulases expressed in E. coli. Mix3 (GH12, GH6_exo, and GH48) and Mix4 (GH12, GH6_exo, GH48, and GH6_endo) represent samples mixed at equal concentrations of each protein. Mix3 Add and Mix4 Add represent sums of individual activities of each protein at the specified concentration. Proteins were purified and saccharifications were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Glucose and cellobiose were measured by HPLC, although only cellobiose is reported in the figure. Measured glucose release is depicted in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material.
FIG 5 Time course experiments for GH12 protein hydrolysis of Avicel (A), filter paper (B), and PASC (C). Sugar products were derivatized with oxime and measured by NIMS. Each point represents the average of three independent replicates.