Literature DB >> 27554648

Prosociality.

Keith Jensen1.   

Abstract

Prosociality refers to behaviours that are intended to benefit others. This definition appears to be so straightforward that it hardly bears mentioning: like certain forms of adult entertainment, we know it when we see it. Yet, determining what counts as prosocial is not as simple as it first appears. There are numerous behaviours that appear prosocial but, on scrutiny, may not have been intended and motivated for the well-being of others. Consider a banal scenario: a seated passenger on a crowded bus stands up and someone takes his seat. Did the person standing up intend that someone else take the seat? Perhaps he was getting off the bus at the next stop and did not care if anyone sat there. But what if he remained standing for several stops, or made an overt gesture such as waving his hand toward the seat? In that case it is more likely that he intended for someone to have his place on the bus. But what about his underlying motives? Maybe he was putting himself in a better position to pick the pocket of the person sitting down. Less sinister possibilities include trying to impress the person who took his seat - trying to improve his reputation, his social standing, as it were. Or maybe, just maybe, he intended for another passenger to sit comfortably, to increase the happiness of a stranger, with no ulterior motives.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554648     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Julia A Camilleri; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Sachs; Salim S Abdool Karim; Lara Aknin; Joseph Allen; Kirsten Brosbøl; Francesca Colombo; Gabriela Cuevas Barron; María Fernanda Espinosa; Vitor Gaspar; Alejandro Gaviria; Andy Haines; Peter J Hotez; Phoebe Koundouri; Felipe Larraín Bascuñán; Jong-Koo Lee; Muhammad Ali Pate; Gabriela Ramos; K Srinath Reddy; Ismail Serageldin; John Thwaites; Vaira Vike-Freiberga; Chen Wang; Miriam Khamadi Were; Lan Xue; Chandrika Bahadur; Maria Elena Bottazzi; Chris Bullen; George Laryea-Adjei; Yanis Ben Amor; Ozge Karadag; Guillaume Lafortune; Emma Torres; Lauren Barredo; Juliana G E Bartels; Neena Joshi; Margaret Hellard; Uyen Kim Huynh; Shweta Khandelwal; Jeffrey V Lazarus; Susan Michie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 202.731

3.  Exploring and Expanding Supererogatory Acts: Beyond Duty for a Sustainable Future.

Authors:  Gareth R T White; Anthony Samuel; Robert J Thomas
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  The nature of prosociality in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Claudio Tennie; Keith Jensen; Josep Call
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Helping-Like Behaviour in Mice Towards Conspecifics Constrained Inside Tubes.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ueno; Shunsuke Suemitsu; Shinji Murakami; Naoya Kitamura; Kenta Wani; Yosuke Matsumoto; Motoi Okamoto; Takeshi Ishihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task.

Authors:  Rachel Dale; Sylvain Palma-Jacinto; Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Friederike Range
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adult bonobos show no prosociality in both prosocial choice task and group service paradigm.

Authors:  Jonas Verspeek; Edwin J C van Leeuwen; Daan W Laméris; Nicky Staes; Jeroen M G Stevens
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The Impact of Socialisation on Children's Prosocial Behaviour. A Study on Primary School Students.

Authors:  Antonio Tintori; Giulia Ciancimino; Rossella Palomba; Cristiana Clementi; Loredana Cerbara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.