Literature DB >> 27554506

Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.

Evan C Cumpston1, Joel H Blumin1, Jonathan M Bock2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Minimal data exist to define the use of contemporary dual pH with multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) probes integrating both pharyngeal acid and impedance sensors to evaluate laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms in a laryngology clinic population. This study was performed to review a series of patients tested with dual pH-MII for suspected LPR symptoms and to analyze pH-MII data findings for this patient cohort. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with planned data collection.
SETTING: Tertiary laryngology clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of possible LPR (dysphonia, chronic cough, globus sensation, subglottic stenosis,) were evaluated with a dual pH-MII system, as well as previously validated reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) instruments.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were evaluated with dual pH-MII studies between 2010 and 2015, with 51 (47%) studies interpreted as "positive" for evidence of significant LPR, 43 (39%) as "negative," and 15 (14%) as "equivocal." Dual pH-MII data analysis showed that positive studies had an average of 2.84 pharyngeal acid exposures below pH 4 (vs 0.28 for negative) and 46 episodes of proximal reflux exposure (either acid or nonacid) by impedance detection (vs 30.6 for negative). RSI scores were significantly different between positive and negative studies, while RFS scores were not.
CONCLUSIONS: Dual pH-MII analysis is a useful supplementary tool to provide objective evidence of pharyngeal reflux exposure in patients with suspected LPR. RSI scores appear to correlate with objective evidence of acid exposure in the pharynx, while RFS scores do not. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LPR; dual pH; impedance; laryngology; laryngopharyngeal reflux; multichannel intraluminal impedance; pH; probe; reflux

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554506     DOI: 10.1177/0194599816665819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  13 in total

1.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux and dysphagia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: is there an association?

Authors:  Fabio Caparroz; Milena Campanholo; Renato Stefanini; Tatiana Vidigal; Leonardo Haddad; Lia Rita Bittencourt; Sergio Tufik; Fernanda Haddad
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Impact of subspecialty training on management of laryngopharyngeal reflux: results of a worldwide survey.

Authors:  Lee M Akst; Jonathan M Bock; Jerome R Lechien; Thomas L Carroll; Jacqueline E Allen; Tareck Ayad; Necati Enver; Young-Gyu Eun; Paulo S Perazzo; Fabio Pupo Ceccon; Geraldo D Sant'Anna; Rui Imamura; Sampath Kumar Raghunandhan; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Sven Saussez; Petros D Karkos; Marc Remacle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Does hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux have to be 24 h?

Authors:  Jinhong Zhang; Xiaoyu Wang; Jiasen Wang; Jing Zhao; Chun Zhang; Zhi Liu; Jinrang Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

6.  Gastric H+/K+-ATPase Expression in Normal Laryngeal Tissue and Laryngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yang-Yang Bao; Qian Jiang; Zhen-Wei Li; Er Yu; Shui-Hong Zhou; Hong-Tian Yao; Jun Fan; Wei-Wei Yong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Quantitative assessment of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Eden Koo; John O Clarke; Boli Yang; Pankaj J Pasricha; Nina Zhang
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-02

8.  Evaluation of Oropharyngeal pH-Monitoring in the Assessment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Lukas Horvath; Patricia Hagmann; Emanuel Burri; Marcel Kraft
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  High-resolution manometry in patients with and without globus pharyngeus and/or symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Heyan Ding; Zhijun Duan; Dong Yang; Zhifeng Zhang; Lixia Wang; Xiaoyu Sun; Yiwen Yao; Xue Lin; Hang Yang; Shan Wang; Jiande D Z Chen
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Gastroesophageal Reflux Characteristics and Patterns in Patients with Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.

Authors:  Hongfei Fang; Don C Codipilly; Karthik Ravi; Dale C Ekbom; Jan L Kasperbauer; Magnus Halland
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.