Michael R Kramer1, Ilana G Raskind2, Miriam E Van Dyke3, Stephen A Matthews4, Jessica N Cook-Smith5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: mkram02@emory.edu. 2. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Department of Sociology & Criminology, Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania. 5. Community Health of Central Washington, Yakima, Washington.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Obesity remains a significant threat to the current and long-term health of U.S. adolescents. The authors developed county-level estimates of adolescent obesity for the contiguous U.S., and then explored the association between 23 conceptually derived area-based correlates of adolescent obesity and ecologic obesity prevalence. METHODS: Multilevel small area regression methods applied to the 2007 and 2011-2012 National Survey of Children's Health produced county-level obesity prevalence estimates for children aged 10-17 years. Exploratory multivariable Bayesian regression estimated the cross-sectional association between nutrition, activity, and macrosocial characteristics of counties and states, and county-level obesity prevalence. All analyses were conducted in 2015. RESULTS: Adolescent obesity varies geographically with clusters of high prevalence in the Deep South and Southern Appalachian regions. Geographic disparities and clustering in observed data are largely explained by hypothesized area-based variables. In adjusted models, activity environment, but not nutrition environment variables were associated with county-level obesity prevalence. County violent crime was associated with higher obesity, whereas recreational facility density was associated with lower obesity. Measures of the macrosocial and relational domain, including community SES, community health, and social marginalization, were the strongest correlates of county-level obesity. CONCLUSIONS: County-level estimates of adolescent obesity demonstrate notable geographic disparities, which are largely explained by conceptually derived area-based contextual measures. This ecologic exploratory study highlights the importance of taking a multidimensional approach to understanding the social and community context in which adolescents make obesity-relevant behavioral choices.
INTRODUCTION:Obesity remains a significant threat to the current and long-term health of U.S. adolescents. The authors developed county-level estimates of adolescent obesity for the contiguous U.S., and then explored the association between 23 conceptually derived area-based correlates of adolescent obesity and ecologic obesity prevalence. METHODS: Multilevel small area regression methods applied to the 2007 and 2011-2012 National Survey of Children's Health produced county-level obesity prevalence estimates for children aged 10-17 years. Exploratory multivariable Bayesian regression estimated the cross-sectional association between nutrition, activity, and macrosocial characteristics of counties and states, and county-level obesity prevalence. All analyses were conducted in 2015. RESULTS:Adolescent obesity varies geographically with clusters of high prevalence in the Deep South and Southern Appalachian regions. Geographic disparities and clustering in observed data are largely explained by hypothesized area-based variables. In adjusted models, activity environment, but not nutrition environment variables were associated with county-level obesity prevalence. County violent crime was associated with higher obesity, whereas recreational facility density was associated with lower obesity. Measures of the macrosocial and relational domain, including community SES, community health, and social marginalization, were the strongest correlates of county-level obesity. CONCLUSIONS: County-level estimates of adolescent obesity demonstrate notable geographic disparities, which are largely explained by conceptually derived area-based contextual measures. This ecologic exploratory study highlights the importance of taking a multidimensional approach to understanding the social and community context in which adolescents make obesity-relevant behavioral choices.
Authors: Kelly D Brownell; Marlene B Schwartz; Rebecca M Puhl; Kathryn E Henderson; Jennifer L Harris Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2009-06-11 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Laura K Cobb; Lawrence J Appel; Manuel Franco; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Alana Nur; Cheryl A M Anderson Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Rebecca H Bitsko; Angelika H Claussen; Jesse Lichstein; Lindsey I Black; Sherry Everett Jones; Melissa L Danielson; Jennifer M Hoenig; Shane P Davis Jack; Debra J Brody; Shiromani Gyawali; Matthew J Maenner; Margaret Warner; Kristin M Holland; Ruth Perou; Alex E Crosby; Stephen J Blumberg; Shelli Avenevoli; Jennifer W Kaminski; Reem M Ghandour Journal: MMWR Suppl Date: 2022-02-25
Authors: Donna L Mendrick; Anna Mae Diehl; Lisa S Topor; Rodney R Dietert; Yvonne Will; Michele A La Merrill; Sebastien Bouret; Vijayalaskshmi Varma; Kenneth L Hastings; Thaddeus T Schug; Susan G Emeigh Hart; Florence G Burleson Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Anja Zgodic; Jan M Eberth; Charity B Breneman; Marilyn E Wende; Andrew T Kaczynski; Angela D Liese; Alexander C McLain Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.363