Literature DB >> 27554019

Effect of the biodegradation rate controlled by pore structures in magnesium phosphate ceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration in vivo.

Ju-Ang Kim1, Jiwon Lim1, Raja Naren2, Hui-Suk Yun3, Eui Kyun Park4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Similar to calcium phosphates, magnesium phosphate (MgP) ceramics have been shown to be biocompatible and support favorable conditions for bone cells. Micropores below 25μm (MgP25), between 25 and 53μm (MgP53), or no micropores (MgP0) were introduced into MgP scaffolds using different sizes of an NaCl template. The porosities of MgP25 and MgP53 were found to be higher than that of MgP0 because of their micro-sized pores. Both in vitro and in vivo analysis showed that MgP scaffolds with high porosity promoted rapid biodegradation. Implantation of the MgP0, MgP25, and MgP53 scaffolds into rabbit calvarial defects (with 4- and 6-mm diameters) was assessed at two times points (4 and 8weeks), followed by analysis of bone regeneration. The micro-CT and histologic analyses of the 4-mm defect showed that the MgP25 and MgP53 scaffolds were degraded completely at 4weeks with simultaneous bone and marrow-like structure regeneration. For the 6-mm defect, a similar pattern of regeneration was observed. These results indicate that the rate of degradation is associated with bone regeneration. The MgP25 and MgP53 scaffold-implanted bone showed a better lamellar structure and enhanced calcification compared to the MgP0 scaffold because of their porosity and degradation rate. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining indicated that the newly formed bone was undergoing maturation and remodeling. Overall, these data suggest that the pore architecture of MgP ceramic scaffolds greatly influence bone formation and remodeling activities and thus should be considered in the design of new scaffolds for long-term bone tissue regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The pore structural conditions of scaffold, including porosity, pore size, pore morphology, and pore interconnectivity affect cell ingrowth, mechanical properties and biodegradabilities, which are key components of scaffold in bone tissue regeneration. In this study, we designed hierarchical pore structure of the magnesium phosphate (MgP) scaffold by combination of the 3D printing process, self-setting reaction and salt-leaching technique, and first studied the effect of pore structures of bioceramic scaffolds on bone tissue regeneration through both in vitro and in vivo studies (rabbit calvarial model). The MgP scaffolds with higher porosity promoted more rapid biodegradation and enhanced new bone formation and remodeling activities at the same time.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodegradation; Bone regeneration; Calvarial defect; Ceramic scaffold; Porosity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27554019     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  18 in total

Review 1.  [The latest study on biomimetic mineralized collagen-based bone materials for pediatric skull regeneration and repair].

Authors:  Bo Li; Shuo Wang; Yonggang Zhao; Xiumei Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-03-15

2.  Extracellular Matrix/Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Nileshkumar Dubey; Jessica A Ferreira; Jos Malda; Sarit B Bhaduri; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 9.229

3.  Injectable, porous, biohybrid hydrogels incorporating decellularized tissue components for soft tissue applications.

Authors:  Yang Zhu; Sato Hideyoshi; Hongbin Jiang; Yasumoto Matsumura; Jenna L Dziki; Samuel T LoPresti; Luai Huleihel; Gabriela N F Faria; Leah C Fuhrman; Ricardo Lodono; Stephen F Badylak; William R Wagner
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Optimized Bone Regeneration in Calvarial Bone Defect Based on Biodegradation-Tailoring Dual-shell Biphasic Bioactive Ceramic Microspheres.

Authors:  Antian Xu; Chen Zhuang; Shuxin Xu; Fuming He; Lijun Xie; Xianyan Yang; Zhongru Gou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Applications of Metals for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Kristina Glenske; Phil Donkiewicz; Alexander Köwitsch; Nada Milosevic-Oljaca; Patrick Rider; Sven Rofall; Jörg Franke; Ole Jung; Ralf Smeets; Reinhard Schnettler; Sabine Wenisch; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Micro-CT - a digital 3D microstructural voyage into scaffolds: a systematic review of the reported methods and results.

Authors:  Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2018-09-26

7.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Poly-L-Lactic Acid Scaffolds with Different Pore Sizes Influence Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis of a Rabbit Skull.

Authors:  Danyang Zhao; Wenbo Jiang; Yu Wang; Chuandong Wang; Xiaoling Zhang; Qingfeng Li; Dong Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effects of surface area and topography on 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone grafting applications.

Authors:  Ashley A Vu; Destany A Burke; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2021-01-26

9.  Numerical Evaluation and Prediction of Porous Implant Design and Flow Performance.

Authors:  Jian Li; Diansheng Chen; Huiqin Luan; Yingying Zhang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Tough magnesium phosphate-based 3D-printed implants induce bone regeneration in an equine defect model.

Authors:  Nasim Golafshan; Elke Vorndran; Stefan Zaharievski; Harold Brommer; Firoz Babu Kadumudi; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz; Uwe Gbureck; René van Weeren; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.