| Literature DB >> 27553655 |
Jung-Yun Lee1, Hyun Soo Kim2, Eun Ji Nam1, Sang Wun Kim1, Sunghoon Kim1, Young Tae Kim3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of initial uterus-preserving surgery, such as myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy, on the recurrence rates of patients with uterine sarcoma found incidentally and to investigate the role of surgical re-exploration in this disease subset.Entities:
Keywords: Endometrial stromal sarcoma; Leiomyosarcoma; Morcellation; Myomectomy; Survival analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27553655 PMCID: PMC4995644 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2727-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Flow diagram in patients with incidentally found uterine sarcoma
Patient characteristics
| Characteristics | Myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy ( | Hysterectomy ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) median (range) | 42 (27–54) | 47 (26–66) |
| Gravidity, median (range) | 3 (0–6) | 3 (0–6) |
| ≤ 2 | 6 (40 %) | 9 (30 %) |
| > 2 | 9 (60 %) | 21 (70 %) |
| Parity, median (range) | 2 (0–3) | 2 (0–4) |
| ≤ 1 | 7 (46.7 %) | 7 (30.3 %) |
| > 1 | 8 (53.3 %) | 23 (76.7 %) |
| Menopause | ||
| Yes | 4 (26.7 %) | 14 (46.7 %) |
| No | 11 (73.3 %) | 16 (53.3 %) |
| Previous cesarean section | ||
| Yes | 3 (20 %) | 4 (13.3 %) |
| No | 12 (80 %) | 26 (86.7 %) |
| Mode of initial surgery | ||
| Laparotomy | 9 (60 %) | 22 (73.3 %) |
| Laparoscopy | 6 (40 %) | 8 (26.7 %) |
| FIGO stage | ||
| IA | 5 (33.3 %) | 7 (23.3 %) |
| IB | 9 (60.0 %) | 22 (73.3 %) |
| IIA | 1 (6.7 %) | 1 (3.3 %) |
| Histology | ||
| Leiomyosarcoma | 7 (46.7 %) | 11 (36.7 %) |
| Endometrial stromal sarcoma | 7 (46.7 %) | 19 (63.3 %) |
| Adenosarcoma | 1 (6.7 %) | 0 |
| Morcellation* | ||
| No | 11 (73.3 %) | 25 (83.3 %) |
| Hand morcellation | 0 (0 %) | 5 (16.7 %) |
| Power morcellation | 4 (26.7 %) | 0 (0 %) |
| Surgical re-exploration* | ||
| Yes | 14 (93.3 %) | 9 (30 %) |
| No | 1 (6.7 %) | 21 (70 %) |
| Adjuvant therapy | ||
| No | 10 (66.7 %) | 15 (50 %) |
| Radiation | 1 (6.7 %) | 5 (16.7 %)a |
| Chemotherapy | 4 (26.7 %) | 14 (46.7 %)a |
*P < 0.05
a4 patients underwent concurrent chemoradiation
Fig. 2Progression-free survival of patients with unexpected sarcoma stratified by type of initial surgery (myomectomy/subtotal hysterectomy vs. total hysterectomy)
Clinicopathologic features of patients with unexpected uterine sarcoma after myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy for presumed uterine leiomyoma
| Patient | Initial surgery | Site of operation | Morcellation | Histology | Surgical re-exploration | Remnant tumor | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lap M | participating institution | Yes | LMS | TAH + BSO + Om + PLND + PALND | No | AWD |
| 2 | Open M | outside institution | No | LMS | TAH + BSO + Om + PLND + PALND | No | NED |
| 3 | Lap subH | outside institution | Yes | LMS | TAH + BSO + PLND | No | D |
| 4 | Open subH | outside institution | No | LMS | TAH + BSO + Om + PLND + Appe | No | NED |
| 5 | Open M | outside institution | No | LMS | TAH + BSO + Om | No | NED |
| 6 | Open subH | outside institution | No | LMS | TAH + BSO + Om + PLND + PALND + Appe | No | NED |
| 7 | Open M | outside institution | No | LMS | TAH + LSO + Om + PLND + Appe | No | AWD |
| 8 | Open M | outside institution | No | ESS | TAH + BSO + Om + PLND + Appe | Yes | NED |
| 9 | Open subH | outside institution | No | ESS | TAH + LSO + Om + PLND + Appe | Yes | NED |
| 10 | Lap M | outside institution | Yes | ESS | TLH + LSO + PLND | Yes | NED |
| 11 | Lap M | outside institution | Yes | ESS | TLH + BSO + PLND + PALND + Appe | No | NED |
| 12 | Open subH | outside institution | No | ESS | TAH + BSO+ Om + PLND + PALND | No | NED |
| 13 | Lap M | participating institution | No | AS | TLH + RSO + PLND | Yes | NED |
| 14 | Lap M | participating institution | No | ESS | No | N/A | NED |
| 15 | Open M | outside institution | No | ESS | TAH + BSO | Yes | NED |
Lap M laparoscopic myomectomy, Open M open myomectomy, Lap subH laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy, Open subH Open subtotal hysterectomy, AWD alive with disease, D death from disease, NED no evidence of disease, TAH total abdominal hysterectomy, TLH total laparoscopic hysterectomy, BSO bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, LSO left salpingo-oophorectomy, RSO right salpingo-oophorectomy, Om omentectomy, PLND pelvic lymphadenectomy, PALND paraaortic lymphadenectomy, Appe appendectomy, LMS leiomyosarcoma, ESS endometrial stromal sarcoma, AS adenosarcoma