Literature DB >> 27553379

The impact of H63D HFE gene carriage on hemoglobin and iron status in children.

Kaczorowska-Hac Barbara1, Luszczyk Marcin2, Antosiewicz Jedrzej3, Ziolkowski Wieslaw4, Adamkiewicz-Drozynska Elzbieta5, Mysliwiec Malgorzata6, Milosz Ewa7, Kaczor Jan Jacek8.   

Abstract

The molecular mechanism that regulates iron homeostasis is based on a network of signals, which reflect on the iron requirements of the body. Hereditary hemochromatosis is a heterogenic metabolic syndrome which is due to unchecked transfer of iron into the bloodstream and its toxic effects on parenchymatous organs. It is caused by the mutation of genes that encode proteins that help hepcidin to monitor serum iron. These proteins include the human hemochromatosis protein -HFE, transferrin-receptor 2, hemojuvelin in rare instances, and ferroportin. HFE-related hemochromatosis is the most frequent form of the disease. Interestingly, the low penetrance of polymorphic HFE genes results in rare clinical presentation of the disease, predominantly in middle-aged males. Taking into account the wide dispersion of HFE mutation in our population and also its unknown role in heterozygotes, we analyzed the impact of H63D HFE carriage in the developmental age, with respect to gender, on the iron status and hemoglobin concentration of carriers in comparison to those of wild-type HFE gene (12.7 ± 3.07 years, 42 boys and 41 girls). H63D carriers presented higher blood iron, transferrin saturation, and ferritin concentration than wild-type probands (p < 0.05.) Interestingly, male H63D carriers showed higher hemoglobin concentration than the unburdened children. Moreover, in the H63D carrier group, a positive correlation between iron and hemoglobin was noted. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that changes in iron metabolism occur at a young age in HFE heterozygotes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Ferritin; HFE mutation; Hemoglobin; Iron; Transferrin saturation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553379      PMCID: PMC5093215          DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2792-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


Introduction

Hereditary hemochromatosis is an autosomal recessive disorder associated with increased intestinal absorption of dietary iron and deposition of excessive amounts of iron in the liver, pancreas, and other organs [1, 2]. The syndrome is a result of genetically determined failure to stop iron entering the circulatory pool when it is not needed. It is associated with several pathogenic mutations of at least five genes (HFE, TfR2, HJV, HAMP, and SLC40A1), and it is likely due to a regulatory defect in iron homeostasis [3, 4]. HFE-related hemochromatosis is the most common genetic disorder in northern European populations with a prevalence of 1:200 to 1:250 for homozygosity and a carrier rate of 1:8 to 1:12 [5, 6]. C282Y polymorphism of the HFE gene is particularly associated with disease development. In the abovementioned populations, simple H63D heterozygosity occurs in at least 23.6–31.1 % [7]. Hereditary hemochromatosis is characterized by enhanced intestinal absorption of iron and its excess accumulation resulting in multiple organ damage, such as cirrhosis, hepatoma, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, and cardiomyopathy. The symptomatic phenotype preceded by fatigue, arthropathy, and impotence occurs predominantly in males between the fourth and sixth decades of life, depending on gene penetration and multiple concomitant factors in C282Y homozygotes, in some cases H63D/C282Y compound heterozygotes, and occasionally H63D homozygotes [1, 8]. HFE gene mutation impact on iron accumulation during the clinical course of hemochromatosis is unpredictable due to reduced gene penetration and coincidence of concomitant endogenic, environmental, and other unknown factors [9-12]. However, HFE homozygotic and even heterozygotic genotypes might be associated with disease progression in the presence of concomitant diseases. The clinical impact of HFE mutation per se still remains unknown. Notably, since iron accumulation is a prolonged process, iron overload is rarely observed in children [13]. Therefore, the developmental population seems to be a promising group to make preliminary observations considering possible HFE gene impact on future iron storage. In our presented investigations, we compared iron metabolism in the developmental age, with respect to gender, of H63D carriers with that of the wild-type group. Moreover, taking into consideration the role of iron in hematopoiesis, we analyzed hemoglobin concentration in particular groups. Iron, ferritin concentration, and transferrin saturation were statistically higher in both H63D gender groups. Moreover, hemoglobin concentration was statistically higher in male H63D carriers than in other groups. Remarkably, the H63D group presented with a statistically significant positive correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration.

Material and methods

Eighty-three, i.e., nonkindred children of Polish origin aged 12.7 ± 3.07 (42 boys and 41 girls), were considered for the study. Fifty children, aged 12.6 ± 2.41 (25 boys and 25 girls) presented with wild-type HFE gene, whereas 33 children, aged 12.8 ± 3.95 (17 boys and 16 girls), were carriers of HFE H63D mutation (data presented in Table 1). Patients’ BMI did not differ statistically. In order to exclude acute and chronic illnesses, or internal organ insufficiency, all patients underwent physical examination, laboratory assays which included a full blood count with reticulocytosis and microscopic evaluation, protein C concentration, aspartate and alaninie transaminase activities, bilirubin, creatinine levels, HBsAg, and anti-HCV antibodies. Iron metabolism was also assessed by measuring iron concentration, ferritin levels, and transferrin saturation (SYSMEX XE 2100, Architect ci 8200, and Test 1 SDL). Abdominal ultrasound was also performed and did not reveal any abnormalities. Patients underwent genetic testing for HFE mutations (H63D S65C C282Y), which was performed using real-time PCR. The study was officially approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Regional Medical Society in Gdansk NKBBN/409/2013 in accord with the Helsinki Declaration.
Table 1

Anthropometric characteristics of the subjects

MutationAge (years)Weight (kg)Height (cm)BMI (kg/m2)
Wild typeF (n = 25)12.1 ± 2.6242.1 ± 14.1149.8 ± 3.318.3 ± 3.63
M (n = 25)13.2 ± 2.1151.3 ± 16.1159.8 ± 15.919.6 ± 3.19
All (n = 50)12.6 ± 2.4146.7 ± 15.7154.8 ± 15.319.0 ± 3.45
H63DF (n = 16)12.0 ± 4.4340.6 ± 20.8a 147.1 ± 22.5c 17.6 ± 5.26
M (n = 17)13.6 ± 3.3957.8 ± 19.8b 164.8 ± 20.520.4 ± 4.11
All (n = 33)12.8 ± 3.9549.5 ± 21.8156.2 ± 23.019.1 ± 4.84

Results are shown as means ± SD

F female, M male, n numbers, BMI body mass index

Statistical significant difference:

Weight; aH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0306; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0468

Height; cH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0288

Anthropometric characteristics of the subjects Results are shown as means ± SD F female, M male, n numbers, BMI body mass index Statistical significant difference: Weight; aH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0306; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0468 Height; cH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0288

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data included Student’s t tests for independent samples to compare categorical variables between wild-type and H63D mutation groups. Differences between gender subgroups of wild-type and H63D mutation groups were calculated with nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis unpaired test. Correlations between iron concentration and hemoglobin were examined by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Values of p ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Calculations were performed using Statistica 10.0 (StatSoft 2011) (References StatSoft, Inc. (2011); STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10; www.statsoft.com).

Results

In the entire group of tested children, the mean concentration of iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation were within normal range (mean values: iron 119.9 μg/dl, SD 48.8; ferritin 32.0 ng/ml, SD 19.0; TIBC 224.9 μg/dl, SD 77.4; and transferrin saturation Ts 32.6 %, SD 13.7). The wild-type HFE gene group (WT group) presented with a mean iron concentration of 99.1 μg/dl, SD 30.7; ferritin 28.3 ng/ml, SD 15.7; TIBC 273.4 μg/dl, SD 45.6; and transferrin saturation 27.1 %, SD 8.3. The H63D mutation carrier group presented with a mean iron concentration of 151.5 μg/dl, SD 54.3; ferritin concentration 37.6 ng/ml, SD 22.1; TIBC 151.5 μg/dl, SD 54.3; and transferrin saturation of 40.9 %, SD 16.1. All the values were statistically higher in the entire H63D carrier group, compared to the wild-type group except for TIBC which was statistically lower (data presented in Table 2). Interestingly, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit levels of the entire H63D carrier group was statistically higher than that of the wild type, while a similar relation was not observed in red blood cell number. Notably, there were some other phenomena noted regarding gender groups such as male H63D carriers having statistically higher iron concentration than female H63D carriers and both WT males, and females as well. In addition, female H63D carriers had statistically higher iron concentration than WT females. Male H63D carriers presented with a statistically lower TIBC and a statistically higher transferrin saturation than both WT gender groups. Female H63D carriers had statistically lower TIBC than both WT gender groups. Hemoglobin concentration of male H63D carriers was statistically higher than that of the other groups. Male H63D carriers presented with a higher red blood cell count than both female groups and higher hematocrit levels than WT female group (data presented in Table 3). Statistically significant positive correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration was noted in the entire H63D group compared with the healthy group, whereas with respect to gender groups (male and female H63D carriers compared to healthy controls), such phenomenon was not noted (data presented in Figs. 1 and 2, Tables 4 and 5).
Table 2

Iron status parameters in control and H63D mutation group

VariablesAll (n = 83)WT (n = 50)H63D (n = 33) p value
Fe (μg/dl)119.9 ± 48.899.1 ± 30.7151.5 ± 54.30.0000a
Ferritin (ng/ml)32.0 ± 19.028.3 ± 15.737.6 ± 22.10.0425a
Ts (%)32.6 ± 13.727.1 ± 8.3140.9 ± 16.10.0000a
Hb (g/dl)14.2 ± 1.3013.8 ± 0.9914.8 ± 1.470.0018a
RBC (ml/dl)4.93 ± 0.454.86 ± 0.395.02 ± 0.520.1305
Ht (%)42.1 ± 5.7040.5 ± 2.7644.4 ± 7.900.0015a
TIBC224.9 ± 77.4273.4 ± 45.6151.5 ± 54.30.0000a

Results are shown as means ± SD

WT wild type, Fe iron, Ts transferrin saturation, Hb hemoglobin concentration, RBC red blood cells, Ht hematocrit, TIBC total iron-binding capacity

aStatistical significant difference

Table 3

Iron status parameters in female and male of control and H63D mutation groups

VariablesWT_F (n = 21)WT_M (n = 39)H63D_F (n = 27)H63D_M (n = 31)
Fe (ug/dl)93.9 ± 26.8104.4 ± 33.9134.0 ± 52.6a 167.9 ± 52.0b,c
Ferritin (ng/ml)28.7 ± 16.227.8 ± 15.632.7 ± 19.842.1 ± 23.7
Ts (%)27.1 ± 7.8327.0 ± 8.9336.8 ± 15.044.7 ± 16.6b,c
Hb (g/dl)13.4 ± 0.7414.2 ± 1.0813.9 ± 0.90d 15.7 ± 1.43b,c
RBC (ml/dl)4.68 ± 0.355.05 ± 0.33e 4.73 ± 0.47d 5.30 ± 0.41b
Ht (%)39.6 ± 2.0841.5 ± 3.0443.3 ± 10.845.4 ± 3.72b
TIBC266.9 ± 7.5279.8 ± 43.6134.0 ± 52.6f,a 167.9 ± 52.0b,c

Results are shown as means ± SD

WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male, Fe iron, Ts transferrin saturation, Hb hemoglobin concentration, RBC red blood cells, Ht hematocrit, TIBC total iron-binding capacity

Statistical significant difference:

Fe; aH63D_F/WT_F, p = 0.0320; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0002; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0002

Ts; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0004; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0004

Hb; dH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0002; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0001; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0006

RBC; dH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0005; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0002; eWT_F/WT_M, p = 0.0048

Ht; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0124

TIBC; fH63D_F/WT_M, p = 0.0001; aH63D_F/WT_F, p = 0.0001; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0001; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0001

Fig. 1

Correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration. H63D group presented with statistical significant positive correlation. Wild-type group (WT): y = 13.4254 + 0.0036*x; r = 0.1125; p = 0.4368; r 2 = 0.0126. Carriers group (H63D): y = 13.0201 + 0.0119*x; r = 0.4382; p = 0.0107; r 2 = 0.1920

Fig. 2

Correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration in gender groups. There were no statistical differences. Wild-type female group (WT_F): y = 13.2572 + 0.0016*x; r = 0.0580; p = 0.7832; r 2 = 0.0034. Wild-type male group (WT_M): y = 14.0069 + 0.0015*x; r = 0.0473; p = 0.8225; r 2 = 0.0022. Carriers male group (H63D_M): y = 13.4959 + 0.0128*x; r = 0.4658; p = 0.0595; r 2 = 0.2170. Carriers female group (H63D_F): y = 13.6595 + 0.0021*x; r = 0.1208; p = 0.6559; r 2 = 0.0146

Table 4

The relationships between the iron (Fe) and hemoglobin (Hb) in control and H63D mutation groups

GroupFe (μg/dl)Hb (g/dl) R p value
WT99.1 ± 30.713.8 ± 0.990.110.4368
H63D151.5 ± 54.314.8 ± 1.470.440.0107a

Results are shown as means ± SD

r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male

aStatistical significant difference

Table 5

The relationships between the iron (Fe) and hemoglobin (Hb) in various gender of control and H63D mutation groups

GroupFe (μg/dl)Hb (g/dl) R p value
WT_F93.9 ± 26.813.4 ± 0.740.060.7832
WT_M104.4 ± 33.914.2 ± 1.080.050.8225
H63D_F134.0 ± 52.613.9 ± 0.900.120.6559
H63D_M167.9 ± 52.015.7 ± 1.430.440.0595

Results are shown as means ± SD

r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male

Iron status parameters in control and H63D mutation group Results are shown as means ± SD WT wild type, Fe iron, Ts transferrin saturation, Hb hemoglobin concentration, RBC red blood cells, Ht hematocrit, TIBC total iron-binding capacity aStatistical significant difference Iron status parameters in female and male of control and H63D mutation groups Results are shown as means ± SD WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male, Fe iron, Ts transferrin saturation, Hb hemoglobin concentration, RBC red blood cells, Ht hematocrit, TIBC total iron-binding capacity Statistical significant difference: Fe; aH63D_F/WT_F, p = 0.0320; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0002; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0002 Ts; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0004; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0004 Hb; dH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0002; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0001; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0006 RBC; dH63D_F/H63D_M, p = 0.0005; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0002; eWT_F/WT_M, p = 0.0048 Ht; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0124 TIBC; fH63D_F/WT_M, p = 0.0001; aH63D_F/WT_F, p = 0.0001; bH63D_M/WT_F, p = 0.0001; cH63D_M/WT_M, p = 0.0001 Correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration. H63D group presented with statistical significant positive correlation. Wild-type group (WT): y = 13.4254 + 0.0036*x; r = 0.1125; p = 0.4368; r 2 = 0.0126. Carriers group (H63D): y = 13.0201 + 0.0119*x; r = 0.4382; p = 0.0107; r 2 = 0.1920 Correlation between iron and hemoglobin concentration in gender groups. There were no statistical differences. Wild-type female group (WT_F): y = 13.2572 + 0.0016*x; r = 0.0580; p = 0.7832; r 2 = 0.0034. Wild-type male group (WT_M): y = 14.0069 + 0.0015*x; r = 0.0473; p = 0.8225; r 2 = 0.0022. Carriers male group (H63D_M): y = 13.4959 + 0.0128*x; r = 0.4658; p = 0.0595; r 2 = 0.2170. Carriers female group (H63D_F): y = 13.6595 + 0.0021*x; r = 0.1208; p = 0.6559; r 2 = 0.0146 The relationships between the iron (Fe) and hemoglobin (Hb) in control and H63D mutation groups Results are shown as means ± SD r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male aStatistical significant difference The relationships between the iron (Fe) and hemoglobin (Hb) in various gender of control and H63D mutation groups Results are shown as means ± SD r Pearson’s correlation coefficient, WT_F wild type female, WT_M wild type male, H63D_F H63D female, H63D_M H63D male

Discussion

The impact of the HFE gene mutation on biochemical features of homozygotic and heterozygotic adults seems to be intelligible [2, 9–11, 14]. The diversity and frequency of gene mutation among populations provide a broad range of biochemical and occasionally clinical symptoms. However, the course of hemochromatosis is unpredictable since reduced gene penetration and possible concomitant environmental and epigenetic factors also play a role in disease development or progression [15, 16]. Therefore, knowing the HFE status of a child together with a precise analysis and follow-up of iron metabolism could identify an affected person who could potentially demonstrate clinical phenotype. In the current study, we compared iron metabolism of H63D HFE gene carriers, as it is the commonest in our population, with that of healthy children, with respect to gender. Statistical analysis displayed significantly higher iron, ferritin concentration, and transferrin saturation in H63D carrier group. Interestingly, all the parameters were higher in heterozygotes of both genders. This supports previous studies that involved HFE polymorphism and its biochemical impact on altered iron metabolism in childhood [17-19]. However, pathological iron loading in primary hemochromatosis is a prolonged and unpredictable process, affected by additional, innate and acquired conditions [1-4]. Results obtained in the present study suggest the need for genotyping chosen subjects from the developmental age. Moreover, an analysis performed on the association of iron and hemoglobin concentration revealed a positive correlation in HFE carrier group. Knowing the undoubted role of this trace element in hematopoiesis, our observations underline its unique impact on variant H63D carriers. The influence of unstable iron homeostasis on erythropoiesis modulation intensity by direct or indirect mediators of the metabolic pathways cannot be excluded [20, 21]. However, the HFE group presented with a positive iron-hemoglobin correlation, only male HFE carriers had statistically higher hemoglobin concentration compared to the other groups, presumably due to the direct effects of pubertal androgens [22]. Expertise on congenital hemochromatosis in children is limited; hence, recording and monitoring of any clinical or laboratory abnormalities in these probands seems to be justified.

Conclusion

H63D variant of HFE gene increased iron absorption and present a positive impact on erythropoiesis modulation in children.
  20 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of transferrin.

Authors:  Dominika Szőke; Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 2.  Molecular insights into the pathogenesis of hereditary haemochromatosis.

Authors:  A Pietrangelo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Coexistence of β-thalassemia trait and hemochromatosis in a 5-year-old girl of Polish origin.

Authors:  Barbara Kaczorowska-Hac; Lucyna Maciejka-Kapuscinska; Ewa Milosz-Bartoszewicz; Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.289

4.  Natural history of HFE simple heterozygosity for C282Y and H63D: a prospective 12-year study.

Authors:  Sophie G Zaloumis; Katrina J Allen; Nadine A Bertalli; Lidija Turkovic; Martin B Delatycki; Amanda J Nicoll; Christine E McLaren; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles; Gregory J Anderson; John K Olynyk; Lawrie W Powell; Lyle C Gurrin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Reverse cascade screening of newborns for hereditary haemochromatosis: a model for other late onset diseases?

Authors:  E Cadet; D Capron; M Gallet; M-L Omanga-Léké; H Boutignon; C Julier; K J H Robson; J Rochette
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  HFE p.C282Y heterozygosity is associated with earlier disease onset in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Martin B Delatycki; Geneieve Tai; Louise Corben; Eppie M Yiu; Marguerite V Evans-Galea; Sarah E M Stephenson; Lyle Gurrin; Katrina J Allen; David Lynch; Paul J Lockhart
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 10.338

7.  Pubertal upregulation of erythropoiesis in boys is determined primarily by androgen.

Authors:  Matti Hero; Sanna Wickman; Raija Hanhijärvi; Martti A Siimes; Leo Dunkel
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Penetrance of 845G--> A (C282Y) HFE hereditary haemochromatosis mutation in the USA.

Authors:  Ernest Beutler; Vincent J Felitti; James A Koziol; Ngoc J Ho; Terri Gelbart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  HFE genotype and transferrin saturation in the United States.

Authors:  Mary E Cogswell; Margaret L Gallagher; Karen K Steinberg; Samuel P Caudill PhD; Anne C Looker; Barbara A Bowman; Elaine W Gunter; Adele L Franks; Glen A Satten; Muin J Khoury; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Iron storage disease: facts, fiction and progress.

Authors:  Ernest Beutler
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reduction of Skeletal Muscle Power in Adolescent Males Carrying H63D Mutation in the HFE Gene.

Authors:  Marcin Luszczyk; Barbara Kaczorowska-Hac; Ewa Milosz; Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska; Ewa Ziemann; Radoslaw Laskowski; Damian Flis; Magdalena Rokicka-Hebel; Jedrzej Antosiewicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Exome sequencing for diagnosis of congenital hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Lamisse Mansour-Hendili; Abdelrazak Aissat; Bouchra Badaoui; Mehdi Sakka; Christine Gameiro; Valérie Ortonne; Orianne Wagner-Ballon; Serge Pissard; Véronique Picard; Khaldoun Ghazal; Michel Bahuau; Corinne Guitton; Ziad Mansour; Mylène Duplan; Arnaud Petit; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Marc Michel; Pablo Bartolucci; Stéphane Moutereau; Benoît Funalot; Frédéric Galactéros
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Interactive Effects between Chronic Lead Exposure and the Homeostatic Iron Regulator Transport HFE Polymorphism on the Human Red Blood Cell Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV).

Authors:  Chien-Juan Chen; Ting-Yi Lin; Chao-Ling Wang; Chi-Kung Ho; Hung-Yi Chuang; Hsin-Su Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Genetic profiles to identify talents in elite endurance athletes and professional football players.

Authors:  David Varillas-Delgado; Esther Morencos; Jorge Gutiérrez-Hellín; Millán Aguilar-Navarro; Alejandro Muñoz; Nuria Mendoza Láiz; Teresa Perucho; Antonio Maestro; Juan José Tellería-Orriols
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.