Literature DB >> 27552712

Simple mathematical model of sacroiliac screws safe-zone-Easy to implement by pelvic inlet and outlet views.

Amir Herman1,2, Emily Keener3, Candice Dubose4, Jason A Lowe4.   

Abstract

Percutaneous sacral screw fixation is the mainstay of posterior pelvic ring fixation. This study quantifies the accuracy of fluoroscopic screw placement using post-operative CT scans and redefines the fluoroscopic safe zone using a mathematical calculation obtained from Inlet and outlet images. The authors hypothesized that a mathematical calculation of screw placement within the ala will improve accuracy of screw placement. A retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center with pelvic fractures fixed with iliosacral screws from January 2011 to December 2014 was performed. Accuracy of screw placement was determined by comparing fluoroscopy to post-operative CT scans. A mathematical calculation of screw position within the sacral ala was applied to determine assess screw position and compared to CT findings. Ninety-four patients with 156 screws met inclusion criteria, of which 50 (32.0%) had a cortical breech on CT. The sensitivity and specificity of the inlet-outlet safe zone using mathematical calculation were 97.1% and 84.0%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 92.7% and 93.3%, respectively. Overall accuracies of the radiographic inlet-outlet and lateral safe zones were 92.9% and 70.0%, respectively (p-value = 0.004). Sacral dysmorphism was not found to be associated with sacral cortical breech. A Simple mathematical calculation (screw position relative to percentage of bone width) on the inlet-outlet provides an accurate way to predict the accuracy of sacroiliac screws. The method is easy to implement, part of the surgery work-flow, and provides higher accuracy than relying on subjective interpretation of inlet, outlet, and lateral images.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1478-1484, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closed reduction; internal fixation; pelvic fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552712     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Intra-operative multi-dimensional fluoroscopy of guidepin placement prior to iliosacral screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries and sacroiliac dislocation: an early case series.

Authors:  James C Shaw; Milton L Chip Routt; Joshua L Gary
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is the Implant in Bone? The Accuracy of CT and Fluoroscopic Imaging for Detecting Malpositioned Pelvic Screw and SI Fusion Implants.

Authors:  Jose E San Miguel-Ruiz; David Polly; Melissa Albersheim; Jonathan Sembrano; Takashi Takahashi; Paul Lender; Christopher T Martin
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

3.  Accuracy of navigated and conventional iliosacral screw placement in B- and C-type pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Josephine Berger-Groch; Marie Lueers; Johannes Maria Rueger; Wolfgang Lehmann; Darius Thiesen; Jan Philipp Kolb; Maximilian Johannes Hartel; Lars Gerhard Grossterlinden
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Ralf Henkelmann; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.