Literature DB >> 27552093

Morphologic Accuracy in Differentiating Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma From Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Cytology Specimens.

Maureen F Zakowski1, Natasha Rekhtman, Manon Auger, Christine N Booth, Barbara Crothers, Mohiddean Ghofrani, Walid Khalbuss, Rodolfo Laucirica, Ann T Moriarty, Z Laura Tabatabai, Güliz A Barkan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: -The National Cancer Care Network and the combined College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines indicate that all lung adenocarcinomas (ADCs) should be tested for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements. As the majority of patients present at a later stage, the subclassification and molecular analysis must be done on cytologic material.
OBJECTIVE: -To evaluate the accuracy and interobserver variability among cytopathologists in subtyping non-small cell lung carcinoma using cytologic preparations.
DESIGN: -Nine cytopathologists from different institutions submitted cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma with surgical follow-up. Cases were independently, blindly reviewed by each cytopathologist. A diagnosis of ADC or squamous cell carcinoma was rendered based on the Diff-Quik, Papanicolaou, and hematoxylin-eosin stains. The specimen types included fine-needle aspiration from lung, lymph node, and bone; touch preparations from lung core biopsies; bronchial washings; and bronchial brushes. A major disagreement was defined as a case being misclassified 3 or more times.
RESULTS: -Ninety-three cases (69 ADC, 24 squamous cell carcinoma) were examined. Of 818 chances (93 cases × 9 cytopathologists) to correctly identify all the cases, 753 correct diagnoses were made (92% overall accuracy). Twenty-five of 69 cases of ADC (36%) and 7 of 24 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (29%) had disagreement (P = .16). Touch preparations were more frequently misdiagnosed compared with other specimens. Diagnostic accuracy of each cytopathologist varied from 78.4% to 98.7% (mean, 91.7%).
CONCLUSION: -Lung ADC can accurately be distinguished from squamous cell carcinoma by morphology in cytologic specimens with excellent interobserver concordance across multiple institutions and levels of cytology experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552093      PMCID: PMC5539947          DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0316-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  17 in total

1.  Histology-based treatment: a new scenario in the management of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.645

2.  NCCN Small-Cell Lung Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Authors:  G Demetri; A Elias; D Gershenson; F Fossella; J Grecula; B Mittal; J Raschko; J Robertson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.990

3.  Depletion of Core Needle Biopsy Cellularity and DNA Content as a Result of Vigorous Touch Preparations.

Authors:  Natasha Rekhtman; Sofia Kazi; JinJuan Yao; Snjezana Dogan; Angela Yannes; Oscar Lin; Mikhail Silk; Tarik Silk; Jeremy C Durack
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing.

Authors:  Natasha Rekhtman; Suzanne M Brandt; Carlie S Sigel; Maria A Friedlander; Gregory J Riely; William D Travis; Maureen F Zakowski; Andre L Moreira
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the pathological typing of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rita Nizzoli; Marcello Tiseo; Francesco Gelsomino; Marco Bartolotti; Maria Majori; Lilia Ferrari; Massimo De Filippo; Guido Rindi; Enrico Maria Silini; Annamaria Guazzi; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Cyto-histologic agreement in pathologic subtyping of non small cell lung carcinoma: review of 602 fine needle aspirates with follow-up surgical specimens over a nine year period and analysis of factors underlying failure to subtype.

Authors:  Gilda da Cunha Santos; Shui Wun Lai; Mauro Ajaj Saieg; William R Geddie; Melania Pintilie; Ming-Sound Tsao; Scott L Boerner; David Hwang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Immunohistochemical subtyping of nonsmall cell lung cancer not otherwise specified in fine-needle aspiration cytology: a retrospective study of 103 cases with surgical correlation.

Authors:  Luisella Righi; Paolo Graziano; Alessandro Fornari; Giulio Rossi; Mattia Barbareschi; Alberto Cavazza; Giuseppe Pelosi; Giorgio V Scagliotti; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  NSCLC subtype prediction using cytologic fluid specimens from needle aspiration biopsies.

Authors:  Arthur Cho; Jin Hur; Yoo Jin Hong; Hye-Jeong Lee; Young Jin Kim; Hee Yeong Kim; Ji Won Lee; Hyo Sup Shim; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.493

9.  Subclassification of non-small cell lung cancer by cytologic sampling: a logical approach with selective use of immunocytochemistry.

Authors:  Hillary Z Kimbrell; Karen S Gustafson; Min Huang; Hormoz Ehya
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.319

Review 10.  First-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the emerging role of the histologic subtype.

Authors:  Marcello Tiseo; Marco Bartolotti; Francesco Gelsomino; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.512

View more
  6 in total

1.  Feasibility of lung cancer RNA acquisition from a single transbronchial or transthoracic needle pass (FASTT trial).

Authors:  Travis Dotson; Christina Bellinger; Jing Su; Kris Hansen; Graham E Parks; James O Cappellari; Lou Craddock; Hollins Clark; Clifford Howard; W Jeffrey Petty; Bharat Prakash; Kounosuke Watabe; Michael Chan; Jonathan Hovda; Lance D Miller; Jimmy Ruiz
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Histopathologic and molecular approach to staging of multiple lung nodules.

Authors:  Frank Schneider; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10

3.  A molecular signature of lung cancer: potential biomarkers for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Varda Shoshan-Barmatz; Yael Bishitz; Avijit Paul; Yakov Krelin; Itay Nakdimon; Nir Peled; Avia Lavon; Elina Rudoy-Zilberman; Yael Refaely
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-06

4.  A combined gene expression tool for parallel histological prediction and gene fusion detection in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Anna Karlsson; Helena Cirenajwis; Kajsa Ericson-Lindquist; Hans Brunnström; Christel Reuterswärd; Mats Jönsson; Cristian Ortiz-Villalón; Aziz Hussein; Bengt Bergman; Anders Vikström; Nastaran Monsef; Eva Branden; Hirsh Koyi; Luigi de Petris; Patrick Micke; Annika Patthey; Annelie F Behndig; Mikael Johansson; Maria Planck; Johan Staaf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Chemopreventive effects of pterostilbene through p53 and cell cycle in mouse lung of squamous cell carcinoma model.

Authors:  Omchit Surien; Ahmad Rohi Ghazali; Siti Fathiah Masre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Utility of liquid-based cytology on residual needle rinses collected from core needle biopsy for lung nodule diagnosis.

Authors:  Zhihua Lan; Xiaoli Zhang; Xin Ma; Yiyan Hu; Jing Zhang; Fang Yang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.