Literature DB >> 27552059

Control of information in working memory: Encoding and removal of distractors in the complex-span paradigm.

Klaus Oberauer1, Stephan Lewandowsky2.   

Abstract

The article reports four experiments with complex-span tasks in which encoding of memory items alternates with processing of distractors. The experiments test two assumptions of a computational model of complex span, SOB-CS: (1) distractor processing impairs memory because distractors are encoded into working memory, thereby interfering with memoranda; and (2) free time following distractors is used to remove them from working memory by unbinding their representations from list context. Experiment 1 shows that distractors are erroneously chosen for recall more often than not-presented stimuli, demonstrating that distractors are encoded into memory. Distractor intrusions declined with longer free time, as predicted by distractor removal. Experiment 2 shows these effects even when distractors precede the memory list, ruling out an account based on selective rehearsal of memoranda during free time. Experiments 3 and 4 test the notion that distractors decay over time. Both experiments show that, contrary to the notion of distractor decay, the chance of a distractor intruding at test does not decline with increasing time since encoding of that distractor. Experiment 4 provides additional evidence against the prediction from distractor decay that distractor intrusions decline over an unfilled retention interval. Taken together, the results support SOB-CS and rule out alternative explanations. Data and simulation code are available on Open Science Framework: osf.io/3ewh7.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex span; Decay; Interference; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552059     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  7 in total

Review 1.  Can we distinguish three maintenance processes in working memory?

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Attention in working memory: attention is needed but it yearns to be free.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Memory and Proactive Interference for spatially distributed items.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  The effects of verbal and spatial memory load on children's processing speed.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Lauren V Hadley; Frances Buttelmann; Tanja Könen; Julie-Anne Meaney; Bonnie Auyeung; Julia Karbach; Nicolas Chevalier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Interference control in working memory: Evidence for discriminant validity between removal and inhibition tasks.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Krishneil A Singh; Gilles E Gignac; Christopher R Brydges; Ullrich K H Ecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Hebb repetition effect in complex span tasks: Evidence for a shared learning mechanism with simple span tasks.

Authors:  Claudia Araya; Klaus Oberauer; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-06

7.  Intelligence IS Cognitive Flexibility: Why Multilevel Models of Within-Individual Processes Are Needed to Realise This.

Authors:  Damian P Birney; Jens F Beckmann
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2022-08-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.