Cheedy Jaja1, Nadine Barrett2, Niren Patel2, Matt Lyon3, Hongyan Xu4, Abdullah Kutlar2. 1. 1 College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. 2 Department of Medicine, Georgia Regents University , Augusta, Georgia . 3. 3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgia Regents University , Augusta, Georgia . 4. 4 Department of Biostatistics, Georgia Regents University , Augusta, Georgia .
Abstract
AIMS: Interindividual variability in drug response and adverse effects have been described for proton pump inhibitors, anticonvulsants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and anti-infectives, but little is known about the safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). We genotyped the CYP2C19 gene which has been implicated in the metabolism of these drugs in an SCD patient cohort to determine the frequencies of reduced function, increased function, or complete loss-of-function variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNAs from 165 unrelated SCD patients were genotyped for nine CYP2C19 (*2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7,*8, *12, and *17) alleles using the iPLEX® ADME PGx multiplex panel. RESULTS: Three CYP2C19 alleles (*2, *12, and *17) were detected with the following frequencies: 0.209, 0.006, and 0.236, respectively. The predicted phenotype frequencies were distributed as extensive (31.5%), intermediate (24.8%), poor (5.5%), ultrarapid (30.3%), and unknown metabolizers (7.9%). DISCUSSION: Prognostic genotyping is potentially useful for identifying SCD patients with allelic variants linked to proven clinical pharmacokinetic consequences for several drugs metabolized by the CYP2C19 gene. However, the main challenge to implementing a genetics-guided prescribing practice is ensuring concordance between CYP2C19 genotypes and metabolic phenotypes in SCD patients.
AIMS: Interindividual variability in drug response and adverse effects have been described for proton pump inhibitors, anticonvulsants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and anti-infectives, but little is known about the safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). We genotyped the CYP2C19 gene which has been implicated in the metabolism of these drugs in an SCDpatient cohort to determine the frequencies of reduced function, increased function, or complete loss-of-function variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNAs from 165 unrelated SCDpatients were genotyped for nine CYP2C19 (*2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *7,*8, *12, and *17) alleles using the iPLEX® ADME PGx multiplex panel. RESULTS: Three CYP2C19 alleles (*2, *12, and *17) were detected with the following frequencies: 0.209, 0.006, and 0.236, respectively. The predicted phenotype frequencies were distributed as extensive (31.5%), intermediate (24.8%), poor (5.5%), ultrarapid (30.3%), and unknown metabolizers (7.9%). DISCUSSION: Prognostic genotyping is potentially useful for identifying SCDpatients with allelic variants linked to proven clinical pharmacokinetic consequences for several drugs metabolized by the CYP2C19 gene. However, the main challenge to implementing a genetics-guided prescribing practice is ensuring concordance between CYP2C19 genotypes and metabolic phenotypes in SCDpatients.
Authors: Sarah C Sim; Carl Risinger; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Eleni Aklillu; Magnus Christensen; Leif Bertilsson; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: C Dandara; C M Masimirembwa; A Magimba; J Sayi; S Kaaya; D K Sommers; J R Snyman; J A Hasler Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: K A Birdwell; B Decker; J M Barbarino; J F Peterson; C M Stein; W Sadee; D Wang; A A Vinks; Y He; J J Swen; J S Leeder; Rhn van Schaik; K E Thummel; T E Klein; K E Caudle; I A M MacPhee Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Stuart A Scott; Katrin Sangkuhl; Alan R Shuldiner; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Caroline F Thorn; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Dirk Sibbing; Werner Koch; Daniela Gebhard; Tibor Schuster; Siegmund Braun; Julia Stegherr; Tanja Morath; Albert Schömig; Nicolas von Beckerath; Adnan Kastrati Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S A Scott; K Sangkuhl; C M Stein; J-S Hulot; J L Mega; D M Roden; T E Klein; M S Sabatine; J A Johnson; A R Shuldiner Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: N A Helsby; W-Y Lo; K Sharples; G Riley; M Murray; K Spells; M Dzhelai; A Simpson; M Findlay Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: L J Rasmussen-Torvik; S C Stallings; A S Gordon; B Almoguera; M A Basford; S J Bielinski; A Brautbar; M H Brilliant; D S Carrell; J J Connolly; D R Crosslin; K F Doheny; C J Gallego; O Gottesman; D S Kim; K A Leppig; R Li; S Lin; S Manzi; A R Mejia; J A Pacheco; V Pan; J Pathak; C L Perry; J F Peterson; C A Prows; J Ralston; L V Rasmussen; M D Ritchie; S Sadhasivam; S A Scott; M Smith; A Vega; A A Vinks; S Volpi; W A Wolf; E Bottinger; R L Chisholm; C G Chute; J L Haines; J B Harley; B Keating; I A Holm; I J Kullo; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; T Manolio; C A McCarty; D A Nickerson; S E Scherer; M S Williams; D M Roden; J C Denny Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 6.875