Literature DB >> 27551673

Dual Anti-Metastatic and Anti-Proliferative Activity Assessment of Two Probiotics on HeLa and HT-29 Cell Lines.

Zahra Nouri1, Fatemeh Karami2, Nadia Neyazi3, Mohammad Hossein Modarressi2, Roya Karimi4, Mohammad Reza Khorramizadeh1, Behrooz Taheri1, Elahe Motevaseli5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lactobacilli are a group of probiotics with beneficial effects on prevention of cancer. However, there is scant data in relation with the impacts of probiotics in late-stage cancer progration, especially metastasis. The present original work was aimed to evaluate the anti-metastatic and anti-proliferative activity of lactobacillus rhamnosus supernatant (LRS) and lactobacillus crispatus supernatant (LCS) on the human cervical and colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (HeLa and HT-29, respectively).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, the anti-proliferative activities of LRS and LCS were determined through MTT assay. MRC-5 was used as a normal cell line. Expression analysis of CASP3, MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1 and TIMP2 genes was performed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), following the cell synchronization.
RESULTS: Supernatants of these two lactobacilli had cytotoxic effect on HeLa, however LRS treatment was only effective on HT-29 cell line. In addition, LRS had no side-effect on normal cells. It was shown that CASP3 gene expression has been reduced after treatment with supernatants of two studied lactobacilli. According to our study, LRS and LCS are efficacious in the prevention of metastasis potency in HeLa cells with decreased expression of MMP2, MMP9 and increased expression of their inhibitors. In the case of HT-29 cells, only LRS showed this effect.
CONCLUSION: Herein, we have demonstrated two probiotics which have anti-metastatic effects on malignant cells and they can be administrated to postpone late-stage of cancer disease. LRS and LCS are effective on HeLa cell lines while only the effect of LRS is significant on HT-29, through cytotoxic and anti-metastatic mechanisms. Further assessments are required to evaluate our results on the other cancer cell lines, in advance to use these probiotics in other extensive trial studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene Expression; HT-29; HeLa; Metastasis; Probiotic

Year:  2016        PMID: 27551673      PMCID: PMC4992182          DOI: 10.22074/cellj.2016.4307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell J        ISSN: 2228-5806            Impact factor:   2.479


Introduction

Probiotics are nutritional supplements produced by viable non-pathogenic micro-organisms, inducing health benefits to the host (1). Probiotic bacteria have shown anti-tumor activities, leading to cancer risk reduction, by several mechanisms including production of anti-mutagenic compounds, degradation of carcinogenic compounds, changing concentration, function and metabolic features of micro-flora, host’s immune response alteration, and affecting the host physiology (2,3). They are effective in delaying cancer onset and progression as well as in controlling cell growth mechanisms (4,5). Most probiotics belong to the genus Lactobacillus which are part of the normal flora in healthy human vagina and have an important function in protecting the host from urogenital infections (6). The role of lactobacilli in modulation of systemic inflammation, apoptosis and cell proliferation as well as protection against pathogenic overgrowth has been demonstrated (7). Probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) including L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, B. longum, and B. lactis have been shown to decrease the incidence of carcinogen-induced colon tumors and precancerous lesions in experimental animals as well as in human (8,12). Although there is considerable evidence supporting the potential role of probiotic LAB in prevention of early stages colon cancer development, scant data exists pertaining to their role in later stages of colorectal cancer and cervical cancer, specifically in metastasis. Tissue invasion and metastasis is dependent on cell invasion through the extracellular matrix (ECM) and involves matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade the ECM during the metastatic process (13,15). MMPs are zinc-dependent secreted proteinases which have critical role in promotion of tumor invasion through proteolytic induction of ECM components such as collagen, fibronectin, and gelatin (16). Recent studies also suggest that some MMPs play roles in tissue remodeling and wound healing (17,18). They are activated after secretion as pro-enzyme and cleaved extra-cellularly (19). TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 are two tissue inhibitors of MMP-9 and MMP-2, respectively (20). To evaluate whether lactobacilli treatment can affect late stages of cancer, specifically metastasis, in the human cervical cancer cells (HeLa) and human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29), expression of the MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 genes were studied by quantitative reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Lactobacillus crispatus (L. crispatus) and Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) are among the most abundant species in healthy women’s vagina (21). It has been shown that common vaginal lactobacilli are cytotoxic for cervical cancer cells, but not for normal cells, independently from pH and lactate (7). To assess the apoptotic effect of these lactobacilli on HeLa and HT-29 cells, gene expression of CASP3 was also analyzed using qRT-PCR.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

In this experimental work, human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (HT-29) and human lung fibroblast (MRC-5) were purchased from Pasture Institute, National Cell Bank of Iran. The cells were cultured for 24 hours in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all provided from Invitrogen, USA) in a humidified 37˚C atmosphere containing 5% CO2 .

Lactobacillus supernatant preparation

De Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) broth (pH=6.5, Merck, Germany) was used to grow L. crispatus strain SJ-3C-US and L. rhamnosus strain GG at 37˚C for 24 hours under micro-aerophilic conditions. Bacterial cultures (2×108c.f.u./ml), which have been incubated for overnight, were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 7 minutes. To remove remaining bacteria and debris the lactobacilli supernatants (LS) were filtered through a 0.2 mm membrane filter. In order to differentiate the effect of lactate produced by L. crispatus supernatant (LCS) and L. rhamnosus supernatant (LRS) with pH change impact, the pH in MRS (6.5) broth was adjusted to pH in LS (4.2 ± 0.1) with lactate, this control is called MRS with lactic acid (MRL). In this experiment, the following conditions were tested: LCS, pH=4.2; LRS, pH=4.2; MRS, pH=6.5; MRL, pH=4.2 in HeLa cells and LCS, pH=4.3; LRS, pH=4.3; MRS, pH=6.5; MRL, pH=4.3 in HT-29 cells.

MTT assay

MTT assay kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was used to measure the inhibitory effect of LCS or LRS on HeLa, HT-29 and MRC-5 cell growth. A total of 104 cells were seeded in each well containing RPMI medium, 10 % FBS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. After 24 hours, cells were treated with lactobacilli culture supernatants with concentration of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25% (v/v) in triplicates. Plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37˚C under 5% (v/v) CO2 . Cell viability was measured by ELISA reader (Anthons2020, version 1.8.3, UK) and analysis was performed using the following equation: Viability (percentage of the control)=[(absorbance of the sample-absorbance of the blank)/[absorbance of the control-absorbance of the blank)]×100 Cell synchronization for RNA extraction HeLa and HT-29 cells were seeded in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin/ streptomycin for 24 hours. Subsequently, each cell line was counted and equal number of the cells were sub-cultured in four 25-cm 3flasks and synchronized, three of which were selected to be treated with LS, MRL and MRS for 4 hours. The last flask was used as control, without any treatment.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated from each treated and non-treated cells using TriPure Reagent kit (Roshe Applied Science, Germany). RNA quality and quantity were determined using Nanodrop, spectrophotometrically (Thermo Scientific, USA). PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Japan) was used for reverse transcription of RNA and then mRNA expression of target genes were analyzed using qRT-PCR. Real-time quantification of purified mRNA genes including MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2, CASP3 and PGM were performed using rotor gene 6000 (Corbet, Australia). Real-time master mix reaction was comprised of 2x master mix (Takara Bio, Japan), 250 ng cDNA, 10 pmol of each primer pairs adjusted with ddH2O up to final reaction of 10 µl. Primer sequences for all of the studied genes were picked up from previous reports and were checked again using online Primer 3 software and NCBI-BLAST (22,27). List of primer sets are available in the Table 1. The thermal cycling program was consisted of an initial cDNA denaturation at 95˚C for 10 seconds, following 50 cycles of two steps amplification, including denaturation at 95˚C for 10 seconds and annealing as well as extension at 65˚C for 30 seconds. The experiments were performed in duplicate for each data point. PGM gene was selected as a normalizer. To ensure the specificity of qRT-PCR products and absence of primer dimer, melting curve analysis was performed after each run of amplification.
Table 1

Sequence of the primers applied for qRT-PCR


Primer Primer sequencesProduct size (bp) References

MMP2F:GCAGTGCAATACCTGAACACC11122
R: GTCTGGGGCAGTCCAAAGAACT
MMP9F:GCACGACGTCTTCCAGTACC12423
R: CAGGATGTCATAGGTCACGTAGC
TIMP1F:TTCTGGCATCCTGTTGTTGCT10624
R: CCTGATGACGAGGTCGGAATT
TIMP2F:TGGAAACGACATTTATGGCAACCC14625
R: CTCCAACGTCCAGCGAGACC
CASP3F:ACATGGCGTGTCATAAAATACC12026
R: CACAAAGCGACTGGATGAAC
PGMF:AGCATTCCGTATTTCCAGCAG12027
R: GCCAGTTGGGGTCTCATACAAA

qRT-PCR; Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

Sequence of the primers applied for qRT-PCR qRT-PCR; Quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of the intended genes, relative expression and group-wise comparison of their total expression between treated and control states, a randomization Excel-based test in relative expression software tool was used. Mann-Whitney test with SPSS software was used to calculate the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). To do this, the treated cell IC50 was compared to MRL and control cells IC50 . Mean ± SE was used to express all data in three separate experiments and P<0.05 was considered as significant threshold.

Results

Cytotoxic effect of L. crispatus strain SJ-3C-US and L. rhamnosus strain GG culture supernatants on HeLa, HT-29 and MRC-5 cell growth

Cell growth inhibitory effects were determined by MTT assay (Fig.1). In this experiment, MRC-5 was used as a normal cell line. Findings demonstrated that LCS and LRS had a significant inhibitory effect on HeLa cell growth in comparison with the cells treated with control MRL and MRS solutions. These results showed that the acidity was not the main cause of HeLa cell growth inhibition. In addition, the IC50 value of LCS and LRS against HeLa cells was respectively 11 and 15% (v/v), proposing that a substance, other than lactate, in the LRS and LCS could only affect the cervical tumor cells (HeLa) but not the normal cells. In contrast to LCS, significantly higher growth inhibitory effect was observed by treatment of the HT-29 cells with LRS. Further analyses showed 17% (v/v) IC50 value for HT-29 treated cells with LRS. Curiously, these findings also suggest the presence of a substance other than lactate in the LRS which can specifically target HT-29 cancer cells but not the normal cell (MRC-5). No sideeffect was detected on the MRC-5 normal cells treated with LRS.
Fig.1

The images represent cytotoxicity effects of LRS, MRL and MRS with different concentrations on A. HT-29 cells, B. MRC-5 as normal cells, as well as LCS, LRS, MRL and MRS on C. HeLa cell line measured by MTT assay. The mean value is represented with three separate experiments for each point. LRS; Lactobacillus rhamnosus supernatant, MRS; De Man Rogosa Sharpe, MRL; MRS with lactic acid, and LCS; Lactobacillus crispatus supernatant.

The images represent cytotoxicity effects of LRS, MRL and MRS with different concentrations on A. HT-29 cells, B. MRC-5 as normal cells, as well as LCS, LRS, MRL and MRS on C. HeLa cell line measured by MTT assay. The mean value is represented with three separate experiments for each point. LRS; Lactobacillus rhamnosus supernatant, MRS; De Man Rogosa Sharpe, MRL; MRS with lactic acid, and LCS; Lactobacillus crispatus supernatant.

MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2 and CASP3 genes expression in HeLa and HT-29 cells treated with LRS or LCS

mRNA expression level of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2 and CASP3 genes were quantified by qRT-PCR after 4 hours treatment with LCS, LRS, MRL or MRS. We determined that mRNA level of MMP2, MMP9 and CASP3 genes were down-regulated, while TIMP1 and TIMP2 expression levels were up-regulated in the HeLa cells treated with LRS or LCS, compared to those cells treated with MRL or MRS. Similarly, LRS down-regulated the mRNA expression level of MMP2, MMP9 and CASP3 genes when TIMP1 and TIMP2 expression levels were upregulated, in comparison with MRL or MRS treated HT-29 cells; but LCS had no significant effect on the expression level of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2 and CASP3 genes in HT-29 cells (Fig.2).
Fig.2

Images show the effect of lactobacilli supernatant on mRNA expression level of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2 and CASP3 genes in the treated HeLa cells with LRS, LCS, MRS and MRL or treated HT-29 cells with LRS, MRS and MRL. *; P<0.05, LRS; Lactobacillus rhamnosus supernatant, MRS; De Man Rogosa Sharpe, MRL; MRS with lactic acid, and LCS; Lactobacillus crispatus supernatant.

Images show the effect of lactobacilli supernatant on mRNA expression level of MMP2, MMP9, TIMP1, TIMP2 and CASP3 genes in the treated HeLa cells with LRS, LCS, MRS and MRL or treated HT-29 cells with LRS, MRS and MRL. *; P<0.05, LRS; Lactobacillus rhamnosus supernatant, MRS; De Man Rogosa Sharpe, MRL; MRS with lactic acid, and LCS; Lactobacillus crispatus supernatant.

Discussion

It has been demonstrated that probiotics could play anti-cancer roles by contributing to several mechanisms, including induction of immune responses as well as anti-proliferative, anti-apoptotic or anti-microbial activities. Evidences revealed that primary colorectal and cervical cancer cells could reach to the other organs such as liver, lung and brain (28,29) by activating MMPs (e.g. MMP2 and MMP9) and subsequently degradation of the ECM (30). We have previously demonstrated that lactobacilli culture supernatants caused significant cytotoxic effect on cervical cancer cells (7). In this study, we have sought the effects of L. crispatus or L. rhamnosuson culture supernatant treatment on HeLa, HT29 and MRC-5 cell growth, using MTT assay and transcriptional analysis of some metastatic genes including MMP-2, MMP-9 and relevant inhibitors. We determined down-regulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 as well as up-regulation of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 gene expression in HeLa and HT-29 cell lines by treatment with LRS, proposing the inhibitory effect of this probiotic on metastasis of cervical and colorectal cancers. Consistent with our findings, L. rhamnosus and L. casei were previously shown to have an inhibitory effect on MMP9 enzymatic activity, while they increased the expression of zona occludense-1, as a critical protein preventing of metastasis in HCT-116 cells (31). In the present study, both LRS and LCS indicated anti-proliferative effect on HeLa cell growth, while only LRS showed an effective role on prohibition of HT-29 cell proliferation. Herein, expression of CASP3 gene (with critical roles in apoptosis) was down-regulated by lactobacilli culture supernatants, confirming, our previously reported results (7). Thus far, several studies indicated that probiotic lactic acid bacteria, including L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, B. longum, and B. lactis supernatants, are able to inhibit colorectal cancer progressions (8,12). It has previously been demonstrated that supernatant of L. Delbrueckii could reduce SW620 colon cancer cell growth by inducing apoptosis through intrinsic CASP-3 dependent pathways. It has been shown that MMP9 enzymatic activity was decreased in the cells treated with supernatant of L. Delbrueckii (32). In addition, treatment of Caco-2 cell line with either L. acidophilus or L. Casei supernatants could increase apoptosis, consequently hindering the cancer cell migrations and invasions (33). Moreover, it was shown that viable or heat-killed L. paracasei IMPC2.1 and L. rhamnosus GG had anti-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects on HGG and DLD-1 (34). Inducing autophagy pathway is the other proposed anti-proliferative mechanism of probiotics while as we demonstrated several genes with crucial autophagy roles were down-regulated in HeLa cells, due to treatment with LCS or LRS (35). However, cell-bound exo-polysaccharides of L. acidophilus 606 have an anti-tumor activity against malignancy in HT-29 cell line, by activating effective genes involved in autophagy pathway including Beclin-1 and GRP78 (36). Therefore, we can deduce that these two lactobacilli culture supernatants are not effective in autophagy and apoptotic process. To determine the pivotal keys contributed to HeLa cell death, further investigations on necrosis procedure are required. In the present study, we have demonstrated that treatment with LRS had no cytotoxic effect on MRC-5 cells, as a normal cell line. A recent study has investigated L. acidophilus 36YL strain metabolites secretion on different cancerous cell lines including HeLa, MCF-7, AGS and HT-29 compared to the normal cells (HUVEC). The metabolites of these bacteria decreased viability in all of the cancerous cell lines with no toxic effect on the normal cells (37). Herein, in comparison with MRL and LRS (at similar pH condition), no cytotoxicity effect was observed in the normal cell line treated with LRS. Regarding the fact that, one of the principle objectives in cancer therapies is limiting damage of normal cells and tissue, it could be further highlighted that LRS contains anti-tumor substances, inducing neither acidity nor cytotoxicity effect on normal cells, compared to MRL.

Conclusion

Probiotics include the major normal flora of colon and cervix. They can open a new way toward prevention or even suppression of cervical cancer and colorectal cancer cell invasions. Further investigations are required to focus on supernatant fraction and assess the effect of these fractions on different cancer cells.
  37 in total

1.  USP15 plays an essential role for caspase-3 activation during Paclitaxel-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Mingli Xu; Masakatsu Takanashi; Kosuke Oikawa; Masami Tanaka; Hirotaka Nishi; Keiichi Isaka; Motoshige Kudo; Masahiko Kuroda
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Dietary synbiotics reduce cancer risk factors in polypectomized and colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Joseph Rafter; Michael Bennett; Giovanna Caderni; Yvonne Clune; Roisin Hughes; Pernilla C Karlsson; Annett Klinder; Micheal O'Riordan; Gerald C O'Sullivan; Beatrice Pool-Zobel; Gerhard Rechkemmer; Monika Roller; Ian Rowland; Maddalena Salvadori; Herbert Thijs; Jan Van Loo; Bernhard Watzl; John K Collins
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  New insights in extracellular matrix remodeling and collagen turnover related pathways in cultured human tenocytes after ciprofloxacin administration.

Authors:  Alessandra Menon; Letizia Pettinari; Carla Martinelli; Graziano Colombo; Nicola Portinaro; Isabella Dalle-Donne; Maria Cristina d'Agostino; Nicoletta Gagliano
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2013-08-11

4.  Antigenotoxicity of probiotics and prebiotics on faecal water-induced DNA damage in human colon adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Anthony J Burns; Ian R Rowland
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  New insights into the roles of matrix metalloproteinases in colorectal cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Matthew F Leeman; Stephanie Curran; Graeme I Murray
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 6.  Historical perspective of matrix metalloproteases.

Authors:  Ashleigh E Pulkoski-Gross
Journal:  Front Biosci (Schol Ed)       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Fermentation supernatants of Lactobacillus delbrueckii inhibit growth of human colon cancer cells and induce apoptosis through a caspase 3-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Ying Wan; Yi Xin; Cuili Zhang; Dachang Wu; Dapeng Ding; Li Tang; Lawrence Owusu; Jing Bai; Weiling Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Molecular regulation of bone marrow metastasis in prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  Fakher Rahim; Saeideh Hajizamani; Esmaeil Mortaz; Ahmad Ahmadzadeh; Mohammad Shahjahani; Saeid Shahrabi; Najmaldin Saki
Journal:  Bone Marrow Res       Date:  2014-07-23

Review 9.  Extracellular matrix degradation and tissue remodeling in periprosthetic loosening and osteolysis: focus on matrix metalloproteinases, their endogenous tissue inhibitors, and the proteasome.

Authors:  Spyros A Syggelos; Alexios J Aletras; Ioanna Smirlaki; Spyros S Skandalis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Differences in vaginal lactobacilli composition of Iranian healthy and bacterial vaginosis infected women: a comparative analysis of their cytotoxic effects with commercial vaginal probiotics.

Authors:  Elahe Motevaseli; Mahdieh Shirzad; Reza Raoofian; Seyyed-Mohammad Hasheminasab; Maryam Hatami; Mehdi Dianatpour; Mohammad-Hossein Modarressi
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 0.611

View more
  15 in total

1.  Probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici strain from tomato pickle displays anti-cancer activity and alleviates gut inflammation in-vitro.

Authors:  Anuradha Barigela; Bhima Bhukya
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Vaginal Bacteria and Risk of Incident and Persistent Infection With High-Risk Subtypes of Human Papillomavirus: A Cohort Study Among Kenyan Women.

Authors:  Kayla A Carter; Sujatha Srinivasan; Tina L Fiedler; Omu Anzala; Joshua Kimani; Vernon Mochache; Jacqueline M Wallis; David N Fredricks; R Scott McClelland; Jennifer E Balkus
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Lactobacilli Differentially Modulate mTOR and Wnt/ β-Catenin Pathways in Different Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Zahra Taherian-Esfahani; Atieh Abedin-Do; Zahra Nouri; Reza Mirfakhraie; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard; Elahe Motevaseli
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 4.  Role of Lactobacillus in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Miao Da; Wenyuan Zhang; Quan Qi; Chun Zhang; Shuwen Han
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  Anti-tumor activities of probiotics in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Moghaddaseh Jahanshahi; Parisa Maleki Dana; Bita Badehnoosh; Zatollah Asemi; Jamal Hallajzadeh; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Bahman Yousefi; Bahram Moazzami; Shahla Chaichian
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.234

6.  Isolation, characterization and identification of antigenotoxic and anticancerous indigenous probiotics and their prophylactic potential in experimental colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Deepika Chandel; Mridul Sharma; Vibhindika Chawla; Naresh Sachdeva; Geeta Shukla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Metabolite secretions of Lactobacillus plantarum YYC-3 may inhibit colon cancer cell metastasis by suppressing the VEGF-MMP2/9 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Yuan-Chun Yue; Bao-Yu Yang; Jing Lu; Shu-Wen Zhang; Liu Liu; Khaled Nassar; Xiao-Xi Xu; Xiao-Yang Pang; Jia-Ping Lv
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Lactobacillus bulgaricus inhibits colitis-associated cancer via a negative regulation of intestinal inflammation in azoxymethane/dextran sodium sulfate model.

Authors:  Denise Sayuri Calheiros Silveira; Luciana Chain Veronez; Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior; Elen Anatriello; Mariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi; Gabriela Pereira-da-Silva
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus crispatus Do Not Have Cytotoxic Effects on HN5 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line.

Authors:  Sepideh Mokhtari; Saede Atarbashi-Moghadam; Elahe Motevaseli; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard; Ardeshir Hesampour
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-09-28

Review 10.  The Role of Probiotics in Cancer Treatment: Emphasis on their In Vivo and In Vitro Anti-metastatic Effects.

Authors:  Elahe Motevaseli; Ali Dianatpour; Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.