| Literature DB >> 27551394 |
Marcela S Rodriguero1, Analía A Lanteri2, Noelia V Guzmán1, Jerson V Carús Guedes3, Viviana A Confalonieri1.
Abstract
Previous research revealed complex diversification patterns in the parthenogenetic weevil Naupactus cervinus. To understand the origin of clonal diversity and successful spreading of this weevil, we investigated its geographic origin and possible dispersal routes and whether parthenogens can persist in habitats under unsuitable environmental conditions. This study is based on samples taken throughout a broad area of the species' range. We used both mitochondrial and nuclear markers and applied phylogenetic and network analyses to infer possible relationships between haplotypes. Bayesian phylogeographic analyses and ecological niche modeling were used to investigate the processes that shaped genetic diversity and enabled the colonization of new geographic areas. Southeastern Brazil emerges as the original distribution area of N. cervinus. We detected two range expansions, one along natural corridors during the Pleistocene and the other in countries outside South America during recent times. Isolation due to climate shifts during the early Pleistocene led to diversification in two divergent clades, which probably survived in different refugia of the Paranaense Forest and the Paraná River delta. The origin of the clonal diversity was probably a complex process including mutational diversification, hybridization, and secondary colonization. The establishment of N. cervinus in areas outside its native range may indicate adaptation to drier and cooler conditions. Parthenogenesis would be advantageous for the colonization of new environments by preventing the breakup of successful gene combinations. As in other insect pests, the present distribution of N. cervinus results from both its evolutionary history and its recent history related to human activities.Entities:
Keywords: Ecological niche modeling; Naupactus cervinus; Pleistocene refugia; invasive weevils; parthenogenesis; range expansion
Year: 2016 PMID: 27551394 PMCID: PMC4984515 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Geographic distribution and genetic diversity of Naupactus cervinus samples. Acronyms of sampling sites, latitude, longitude, sampling size, mitochondrial haplotypes, and nuclear alleles are specified for each location
| Sampling location | Acronym | Latitude, Longitude |
| mtDNA haplotypes | nDNA alleles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI, Canary Islands, Tenerife | Te | 27 | 5 | B | VII |
| AR, Bs. As., Benavídez | Be | 34° 24′ S, 58° 41′ W | 7 | C | VI |
| AR, Bs. As., Buenos Aires City | BA | 34 | 8 | B | V |
| AR, Bs. As., Cardales | Ca | 34 | 5 | B | VI |
| AR, Bs. As., Reserva Otamendi | RO | 34 | 21 | N | VII |
| AR, Bs. As., Pereyra Iraola | PI | 34 | 13 | B | VI |
| AR, Bs. As., Pergamino | Pe | 33 | 2 | B | VII |
| AR, Bs. As., Talavera Island | TI | 34 | 19 | B | VI |
| AR, Bs. As., Tandil | Ta | 37 | 18 | B | V |
| AR, Bs. As., Tres Lomas | TL | 36 | 8 | B | VII |
| AR, Bs. As., Zárate | Za | 34 | 20 | B | VII |
| AR, Córdoba, La Falda | LF | 31 | 13 | B | VII |
| AR, Córdoba, Río Cuarto | RC | 33 | 5 | A | VII |
| AR, Corrientes, Yapeyú | Ya | 29 | 5 | C |
|
| AR, E. Ríos, Brazo Largo | BL | 33 | 14 | C | VII |
| AR, E. Ríos, Cerrito | Ce | 31 | 3 | C | V |
| AR, E. Ríos, Chajarí | Chj | 30 | 6 | F | VI |
| AR, E. Ríos, El Palmar | EP | 31 | 14 | F | VI |
| AR, E. Ríos, Gualeguaychú | Gu | 33 | 18 | F | VI |
| AR, E. Ríos, La Paz | LP | 30 | 6 | R |
|
| AR, E. Ríos, Salto Grande | SG | 31 | 12 | F | VI |
| AR, E. Ríos, Santa Elena | SE | 30 | 2 | X | XVII |
| AR, Mendoza, Godoy Cruz | GC | 32 | 3 | A | VII |
| AR, Mendoza, Mendoza | Me | 33 | 3 | B | VII |
| AR, Misiones, Cerro Azul | CA | 27 | 17 | Q | IV |
| AR, Misiones, Oberá | Ob | 27 | 2 | Q | III |
| AR, Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán | Tu | 26 | 1 | A | V |
| AU, Victoria, Tatura | Ta | 36 | 1 | B | V |
| AU, Victoria, Vermont | Ve | 37 | 1 | B | V |
| BR, PR, Laranjeiras do Sul | LS | 25 | 11 | R | XII |
| BR, PR, Ponta Grossa | PG | 25 | 14 | C | I |
| BR, PR, Toledo | To | 24 | 10 | C | H |
| BR, RG do Sul, Alegrete | Al | 29 | 6 | C | VI |
| BR, RG do Sul, Bozano | Bo | 28 | 4 | C | II |
| BR, RG do Sul, Ijui | Ij | 28 | 8 | C | XV |
| BR, RG do Sul, Itaára | It | 29 | 9 | C | VIII |
| BR, RG do Sul, Jari | Ja | 29 | 10 | C | XV |
| BR, RG do Sul, Santa Maria | SM | 29 | 14 | C | IV |
| BR, RG do Sul, São Sepé | SS | 30 | 11 | P | IV |
| BR, SC, Chapecó | Chp | 27 | 8 | E |
|
| CH, Bío Bío, Chillan | Chi | 36 | 1 | B | VII |
| CH, Region Metropolitana, Santiago | SC | 33 | 8 | B | VII |
| CH, Coquimba, La Serena | LSe | 29 | 3 | M | VII |
| CH, Huasco, Vallenar | Var | 28 | 11 | I | VII |
| EU, Spain, Valencia | Val | 39 | 12 | B | VII |
| NZ, Auckland, Awhitu | Aw | 37 | 1 | B | V |
| NZ, Bay of Plenty, Matapihi | Ma | 37° 41′ S, 176° 11′ E | 1 | B | V |
| PI, Easter Island (Rapa Nui) | EI | 27° 08′ S, 109° 26′ W | 7 | I | VII |
| PI, French Polynesia, Rapa Island (Rapa Iti) | RI | 27° 32′ S, 144° 20′ W | 1 | B | VII |
| PI, Hawaii, Big Island | BI | 19° 36′ N, 155° 39′ W | 1 | B | V |
| PI, Hawaii, Kauai | Ka | 22° 07′ N, 159° 31′ W | 2 | B | V |
| PI, Hawaii, Maui | Mu | 20° 50′ N, 156° 20′ W | 1 | B | V |
| PI, Hawaii, Oahu | Oh | 21° 28′ N, 157° 59′ W | 1 | B | V |
| PI, French Polynesia, Tahiti | Th | 17° 52′ S, 149° 56′ W | 3 | B | VII |
| UR, Libertad | Li | 34° 37′ S, 56° 37′ W | 2 | B | VI |
AI, Atlantic Islands; AR, Argentina; AU, Australia; BR, Brazil; CH, Chile; EU, European Union; NZ, New Zealand; PI, Pacific Islands; UR, Uruguay.
Bs. As., Buenos Aires; E. Ríos, Entre Ríos; PR, Paraná; RS do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul; SC, Santa Catarina.
Extracted from Rodriguero et al. (2010a).
Obtained for the present work.
Extracted from Rodriguero et al. (2013).
Extracted from Mander et al. (2003).
“Double peaks” individuals.
Figure 1(A) Spatial distribution of mitochondrial genetic variation of Naupactus cervinus in South America. The pie chart at each sampling site shows relative frequencies of haplotypes. (B) Statistical parsimony network of mitochondrial haplotypes. Lines represent the most‐parsimonious relationships between haplotypes, open circles represent individual haplotypes, and unlabeled nodes indicate inferred steps not found in the samples. Rectangles indicate possible ancestral haplotypes. Circle size is not proportional to haplotype frequency. Clades Ia, Ib, and II refer to the haplotype groupings recovered by parsimony analysis in Figure 3. Loops indicate uncertain relationships between haplotypes.
Figure 2Worldwide spatial distribution of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic variation of Naupactus cervinus. The pie chart at each sampling site shows relative frequencies of haplotypes. The left and right side of the circle depicts the mitochondrial and nuclear variants, respectively.
Figure 3(A) Phylogenetic tree of COI haplotypes. Numbers above the branches are 50% or higher bootstrap values. Numbers above branches are ≥50% bootstrap values. (B) Phylogenetic tree of ITS1 alleles. Numbers above branches are ≥50% bootstrap values.
Genetic variation estimates of the mitochondrial and nuclear markers for the whole sample and each clade
| Dataset | Clade |
|
|
| Hd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Total sample | 395 | 0.01134 ± 0.00074 | 0.01199 ± 0.00296 | 0.869 ± 0.00700 |
| Clade Ia | 74 | 0.00624 ± 0.00034 | 0.00321 ± 0.00124 | 0.683 ± 0.00145 | |
| Clade Ib | 311 | 0.00270 ± 0.00008 | 0.00386 ± 0.00127 | 0.821 ± 0.00010 | |
| Clade II | 10 | 0.00321 ± 0.00101 | 0.00307 ± 0.00176 | 0.511 ± 0.16400 | |
| ITS1 | Total sample | 258 | 0.02274 ± 0.00075 | 0.01639 ± 0.00377 | 0.656 ± 0.00260 |
| Clade A | 95 | 0.00213 ± 0.00023 | 0.00315 ± 0.00112 | 0.544 ± 0.03800 | |
| Clade B | 163 | 0.00570 ± 0.00131 | 0.01167 ± 0.00297 | 0.291 ± 0.04700 |
Figure 4(A) Spatial distribution of nuclear genetic variation of Naupactus cervinus. The pie chart at each sampling site shows relative frequencies of alleles. (B) Statistical parsimony network of nuclear alleles. Lines represent the most‐parsimonious relationships between alleles, open circles represent individual alleles, and unlabeled nodes indicate inferred steps not found in the samples. Rectangles indicate possible ancestral alleles. Circle size is not proportional to allele frequency. Individuals yielding double‐peak chromatograms are shown in yellow. Clades A and B refer to haplotype groupings recovered by parsimony analysis in Figure 3.
Figure 5(A) Time‐calibrated maximum clade credibility tree from Bayesian phylogeographic analysis showing ancestors’ identity above branches and posterior probabilities >0.8 below branches. Numbers at the bottom indicate a relative time scale in millions of years before present. The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site. The identity of every ancestor is used to portray the main events in the evolutionary history of Naupactus cervinus (see text for details). (B) Spatial distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Naupactus cervinus over time (1.63–0.72 Myr). Distribution changes were inferred from a continuous phylogeographic analysis using a relaxed random walk. The timing of distribution changes are based on rates of sequence evolution in mtDNA following Papadopoulou et al. (2010), assuming a strict molecular clock. Scale bar is 800 km. The original surface of the Paranaense Forest is shown in green. (C) Spatial distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Naupactus cervinus (between 0.72 and 0.18 Myr). (D) Spatial distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Naupactus cervinus (between 0.33 and 0.15 Myr). (E) Spatial distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Naupactus cervinus (between 0.18 and 0.01 Myr).
Figure 6(A) Predicted geographic distribution of Naupactus cervinus based on current climatic conditions. Grid cells are classified by predicted suitability, with blue being least suitable and red being most suitable. (B) Predicted geographic distribution of Naupactus cervinus based on LIG climatic conditions. (C) Predicted geographic distribution of Naupactus cervinus based on LGM climatic conditions. (D) Predicted geographic distribution of Naupactus cervinus based on current climatic conditions projected onto the whole world. White dots correspond to localities outside South America where the species was recorded (see Table S3), which were not included in the niche modeling analysis.