| Literature DB >> 27551279 |
Lucie Léonard1, Lynda Bouarab Chibane1, Balkis Ouled Bouhedda1, Pascal Degraeve1, Nadia Oulahal1.
Abstract
The investigation on antimicrobial mechanisms is a challenging and crucial issue in the fields of food or clinical microbiology, as it constitutes a prerequisite to the development of new antimicrobial processes or compounds, as well as to anticipate phenomenon of microbial resistance. Nowadays it is accepted that a cells population exposed to a stress can cause the appearance of different cell populations and in particular sub-lethally compromised cells which could be defined as viable but non-culturable (VBNC). Recent advances on flow cytometry (FCM) and especially on multi-parameter flow cytometry (MP-FCM) provide the opportunity to obtain high-speed information at real time on damage at single-cell level. This review gathers MP-FCM methodologies based on individual and simultaneous staining of microbial cells employed to investigate their physiological state following different physical and chemical antimicrobial treatments. Special attention will be paid to recent studies exploiting the possibility to corroborate MP-FCM results with additional techniques (plate counting, microscopy, spectroscopy, molecular biology techniques, membrane modeling) in order to elucidate the antimicrobial mechanism of action of a given antimicrobial treatment or compound. The combination of MP-FCM methodologies with these additional methods is namely a promising and increasingly used approach to give further insight in differences in microbial sub-population evolutions in response to antimicrobial treatments.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial mechanism; antimicrobial treatment; culturability; double-staining; microorganisms; multi-parameter flow cytometry; viability
Year: 2016 PMID: 27551279 PMCID: PMC4976717 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Examples of individual uses of dyes to perform a multi-parameter flow cytometry analysis in order to characterize antimicrobial mechanisms.
| Antolinos et al., | Effect of acid shock on cell viability of | • PI (membrane permeability) | pH 3.4, 3.8, and 4.2 caused membrane disruption and subsequent bacterial cell death in the first 24 h exposition to these acidic environments. |
| Boda et al., | Investigate the generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) causing peroxidation of the membrane lipids and ion channel proteins, leading to greater permeabilization of the bacterial membranes | • DCFH-DA [intracellular indicator of reactive oxygen species (ROS)] | ~60 and ~70% reduction was recorded in the survival of staphylococcal species and |
| Caldeira et al., | Assessment of antibacterial properties of L-cysteine and mechanism of action against | • PI (membrane permeability) | The main mechanism of action of L-Cys on both bacteria, |
| Kramer and Muranyi, | Investigate the effects of a pulsed light treatment on the physiological properties of | • PI (membrane permeability) | Oxidative stress with concomitant damage to the DNA molecule was shown to be directly responsible for the loss of cultivability due to pulsed light rather than a direct rupture of cell membranes or inactivation of intracellular enzymes. |
| Kramer and Thielmann, | Monitoring the live to dead transition of bacteria during thermal stress | • PI (membrane permeability) | Exposure to moderate heat first of all compromised the function of the respiration chain and other heat sensitive proteins of the cell membrane such as efflux pumps. Membrane rupture and intracellular esterase activity were less affected and strong differences depending on the type of bacteria regarding their Gram-staining behavior were observed. |
| Lee et al., | Mechanism of action of scopolendin 2 against | • Sytox Green | Scopolendin 2 led to the formation of pores in microbial plasma membrane, subsequent leakage of cytoplasmic matrix components and consequent membrane depolarization, ultimately resulting in microbial cell death. |
| Morishige et al., | Analysis of the metabolic response of H2O2-treated | • CTC (respiratory activity) | H2O2-treated |
| Silva et al., | • PI (membrane permeability) | Coriander essential oil kills | |
| Teng et al., | Elucidate further the antimicrobial mechanism of AvBD103b, an avian defensin, on the | • PI (membrane permeability) | Antimicrobial target of AvBD103b was the cell membrane. |
PI, Propidium Iodide; cFDA, carboxyFluorescein DiAcetate; DiBAC.
Figure 1Examples data acquisition obtained with single dye. (I) Membrane permeabilization of candida albicans, detected by SYTOX green fluorescence. The cells were treated with scolopendin 2, BUF (6−21), or Melittin at MIC. (a) Control, (b) Scolopendin, (c) BUF (6−21), (d) melittin (Lee et al., 2015). (II) Respiratory Activity of H2O2–treated Salmonella entertitids cells analyzed by flow cytometry: Cytograms of CTC-stained cells. The horizontal axis indicates the fluorescence intensity of CTC-formazan; and the vertical axis, side-light scatter intensity. The respiratory-active Subpopulation was gated in the right rectangle (P3); and the inactive subpopulation, in the left one (P2). H2O2 concentrations: 0, 1, 3, or 10 mM (Morishige et al., 2015).
Figure 2Dual parameter FCM dot plots. (I). Dual parameters with two discriminated dyes. I.1. Four different behaviors detected: quadrant A1, FL1−/FL2+; quadrant A2 FL1+/FL2+; quadrant A3, FL1−/FL2−; quadrant A4 FL1+/FL2−. I.2. Dots blots of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG to assess the effects of different pressure (100,400,600 MPa) and thermal (95°C)treatment on esterase activity (cFDA) and membrane integrity (P1): quadrant A1, cF−/P1+; quadrant A2, cF+/P1+;quadrant A3, cF−/P1−; quadrant A4, cF+/P1− (Ananta et al., 2004). (II). Dual parameter dot plots with one discriminated dye. II. 1 Two different behaviors detected: initial state/Final state. II. 2.Syto9-CTC stained Arcobacter cryaeophilus LMG 10829 with resveratrol at concentration of 0 (control), 1xMIC and 4xMIC: initial state: Syto9+/CTC; Final state: Syto9+/CTC−(Ferreira et al., 2014).
Multi-fluorescence properties of double-stained cells collected in a same area with the explanation of the underlying cellular mechanism.
| I. Membrane integrity | Syto9 (or SYBR-I, Syto13)/PI | Green/Red | Syto9+ | PI− | Intact cells |
| Syto9− | PI+ | Permeabilized cells | |||
| Syto9+ | PI+ | Partially-permeabilized cells | |||
| Syto9− | PI− | Unstained debris | |||
| References: Possemiers et al., | |||||
| TO/PI | Green/Red | TO+ | PI− | Intact cell membranes | |
| TO− | PI+ | Permeabilized cell membrane | |||
| TO+ | PI+ | Cell membrane damaged, slightly permeabilized | |||
| TO− | PI− | Damage of DNA and RNA while the cell may still be intact | |||
| References: Surowsky et al., | |||||
| II. Membrane integrity/physiological state | |||||
| A. Enzyme activity | PI/cFDA | Red/Green | PI+ | cF− | Esterase activity not detectable, membrane compromised |
| PI+ | cF+ | Viable injured or stressed cells with intracellular activity and minimally compromised membrane | |||
| PI− | cF+ | Active esterase, intact membrane | |||
| PI− | cF− | Inactive esterase or cF extruded out of the cells, intact membrane, or unstained debris | |||
| References: Ananta et al., | |||||
| B. Pump activity | Syto9/EB | Green/Red | (Syto9+ EB+ green and red high intensity) | Cells with efflux pump completely damaged | |
| References: Kim et al., | |||||
| C. Membrane potential | IP/DiBAC4 | Red/Green | PI− | DiBAC4− | Unstained population of intact cells |
| PI− | DiBAC4+ | Depolarized cells | |||
| PI+ PI+ | DiBAC4− DiBAC4+ | Population of permeabilized cells with different degrees of damage | |||
| References: Novo et al., | |||||
| Syto40/DiBAC4 | Blue/Green | Syto40+ | DiBAC4+ | Depolarized cells | |
| (blue and green high intensity) | |||||
| References: Duarte et al., | |||||
| TO-PRO®3/DiOC2(3) | Far red/Green shift to red | TO-PRO®3+ | DiOC2(3)+ | Permeabilized and depolarized | |
| TO-PRO®3+ | DiOC2(3)− | Permeabilized and polarized | |||
| TO-PRO®3− | DiOC2(3)+ | Non-permeabilized and depolarized | |||
| TO-PRO®3− | DiOC2(3)− | Non-permeabilized and polarized | |||
| References: Novo et al., | |||||
| D. Respiratory activity | Syto40/CTC | Blue/red | Syto40+ | CTC+ | Cells with respiratory activity |
| (blue and red high intensity) | |||||
| References: Duarte et al., | |||||
| Syto9/CTC | Green/red | Syto9+ | CTC+ | Cells with respiratory activity | |
| (green and red high intensity) | |||||
| References: Ferreira et al., | |||||
| III. DNA/Antibody β-lactamase activity | Syto62/anti β -lactamase mAb AF488-DAM IgG | Red/Green | Syto62+ | anti β-lactamase mAb AF488-DAM IgG+ | Cells with β-lactamase activity |
| References: Huang et al., | |||||
PI, Propidium Iodide; TO, Thiazole Orange; cFDA, carboxyFluorescein DiAcetate; DiBAC.
Additional methods to complete MP-FCM analysis in order to better describe cell populations after exposure to an antimicrobial treatment.
| Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) | Ayari et al., |
| Choi et al., | |
| Coronel-León et al., | |
| Hong et al., | |
| Li H. et al., | |
| Teng et al., | |
| Wu et al., | |
| Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) | Ferreira et al., |
| Li H. et al., | |
| Hong et al., | |
| Muriel-Galet et al., | |
| Spilimbergo et al., | |
| Surowsky et al., | |
| Fluorescence microscopy | Fernandes et al., |
| Hong et al., | |
| Li W. et al., | |
| Tamburini et al., | |
| Thabet et al., | |
| Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) | Booyens and Thantsha, |
| Meng et al., | |
| Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy (NMR) | Tamburini et al., |
| Circular Dichroism spectroscopy (CD) | Teng et al., |
| Membrane models | Lee et al., |
| Grau-Campistany et al., | |
| Wu et al., | |
| Propidium MonoAzide quantitative-Polymerase | Ferrentino et al., |
| Chain reaction (PMA-qPCR) | Tamburini et al., |
CFU and MP-FCM results correlation and non-correlation.
| CFU and FCM results correlation | Carvacrol + nisin combined with irradiation | PI/cFDA | Ayari et al., | |
| Pulsed magnetic fields | Syto9/PI | Boda et al., | ||
| TiO2-nanoparticles | SYBR-I, PI/cFDA | Combarros et al., | ||
| Lipopeptide antibiotics derived from polymyxin B | PI/DiBAC4 | Grau-Campistany et al., | ||
| Essential oils | Lactic acid bacteria | PI/cFDA | Hayouni et al., | |
| Essential oils | Syto9/PI | Muñoz et al., | ||
| D- | Syto9/PI | Possemiers et al., | ||
| UV-A photocalalysis | PI/cFDA-AM | Thabet et al., | ||
| CFU and FCM results non-correlation | High hydrostatic pressure | PI/cFDA | Ananta et al., | |
| Carvacrol or nisin | PI/cFDA | Ayari et al., | ||
| Resveratrol inclusion complexes | Syto40/DiBAC4 | Duarte et al., | ||
| Super-critical CO2 | SYBR-I/PI | Ferrentino et al., | ||
| Super-critical CO2 | Syto9/EB | Kim et al., | ||
| Pulsed light | PI, DiBAC4, EB, cFDA | Kramer and Muranyi, | ||
| Thermal treatment | PI, DiBAC4, EB, cFDA | Kramer and Thielmann, | ||
| Super-critical CO2 | Syto9/PI | Li H. et al., | ||
| Blue light-activated curcumin | Syto9/PI | Manoil et al., | ||
| Silver | Syto9/PI | Martínez-Abad et al., | ||
| Ultra-high hydrostatic pressure and mild heat | PI/cFDA | Meng et al., | ||
| NaCl | SYBR-I/PI | Pianetti et al., | ||
| UV-C light | PI/cFDA | Schenk et al., | ||
| Super-critical CO2 | SYBR-I/PI | Spilimbergo et al., | ||
| Super-critical CO2 | SYBR-I/PI | Tamburini et al., |
PI, Propidium Iodide; cFDA, carboxyFluorescein DiAcetate; cFDA-AM, carboxyFluorescein DiAcetate-acetoxymethyl; DiBAC.