Literature DB >> 27550945

Differences in time-dependent mechanical properties between extruded and molded hydrogels.

N Ersumo1, C E Witherel, K L Spiller.   

Abstract

The mechanical properties of hydrogels used in biomaterials and tissue engineering applications are critical determinants of their functionality. Despite the recent rise of additive manufacturing, and specifically extrusion-based bioprinting, as a prominent biofabrication method, comprehensive studies investigating the mechanical behavior of extruded constructs remain lacking. To address this gap in knowledge, we compared the mechanical properties and swelling properties of crosslinked gelatin-based hydrogels prepared by conventional molding techniques or by 3D bioprinting using a BioBots Beta pneumatic extruder. A preliminary characterization of the impact of bioprinting parameters on construct properties revealed that both Young's modulus and optimal extruding pressure increased with polymer content, and that printing resolution increased with both printing speed and nozzle gauge. High viability (>95%) of encapsulated NIH 3T3 fibroblasts confirmed the cytocompatibility of the construct preparation process. Interestingly, the Young's moduli of extruded and molded constructs were not different, but extruded constructs did show increases in both the rate and extent of time-dependent mechanical behavior observed in creep. Despite similar polymer densities, extruded hydrogels showed greater swelling over time compared to molded hydrogels, suggesting that differences in creep behavior derived from differences in microstructure and fluid flow. Because of the crucial roles of time-dependent mechanical properties, fluid flow, and swelling properties on tissue and cell behavior, these findings highlight the need for greater consideration of the effects of the extrusion process on hydrogel properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27550945      PMCID: PMC5118821          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  51 in total

1.  A three-dimensional bioprinting system for use with a hydrogel-based biomaterial and printing parameter characterization.

Authors:  Seung-Joon Song; Jaesoon Choi; Yong-Doo Park; Jung-Joo Lee; So Young Hong; Kyung Sun
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.094

2.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion.

Authors:  Tony Yeung; Penelope C Georges; Lisa A Flanagan; Beatrice Marg; Miguelina Ortiz; Makoto Funaki; Nastaran Zahir; Wenyu Ming; Valerie Weaver; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2005-01

Review 3.  Collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Julie Glowacki; Shuichi Mizuno
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  A poroelastic model describing nutrient transport and cell stresses within a cyclically strained collagen hydrogel.

Authors:  Benjamin L Vaughan; Peter A Galie; Jan P Stegemann; James B Grotberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation.

Authors:  Silvia Budday; Richard Nay; Rijk de Rooij; Paul Steinmann; Thomas Wyrobek; Timothy C Ovaert; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 6.  Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Akiko Mammoto; Tadanori Mammoto; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Cui; Kurt Breitenkamp; M G Finn; Martin Lotz; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Poro-viscoelastic constitutive modeling of unconfined creep of hydrogels using finite element analysis with integrated optimization method.

Authors:  Kaifeng Liu; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-12-24

Review 10.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology in functional tissue engineering.

Authors:  Farshid Guilak; David L Butler; Steven A Goldstein; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Jesse K Placone; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.

Authors:  Xuanyi Ma; Justin Liu; Wei Zhu; Min Tang; Natalie Lawrence; Claire Yu; Maling Gou; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Advances in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Innovation and Transformation of Medicine.

Authors:  Kevin Dzobo; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Hendrina Shipanga; Arielle Rowe; Collet Dandara; Michael Pillay; Keolebogile Shirley Caroline M Motaung
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  The orthotropic viscoelastic characterisation of sub-zero 3D-printed poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogel.

Authors:  J P Crolla; M M Britton; D M Espino; L E J Thomas-Seale
Journal:  MRS Adv       Date:  2021-06-22

5.  Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sam P Tarassoli; Zita M Jessop; Thomas Jovic; Karl Hawkins; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.