| Literature DB >> 27550821 |
Kezhong Zhang1,2,3, Guohui Wang1,4, Xuebao Zhang1, Philipp P Hüttemann1, Yining Qiu1, Jenney Liu1, Allison Mitchell3, Icksoo Lee1,5, Chao Zhang1, Jin-Sook Lee1, Petr Pecina1, Guojun Wu3, Zeng-Quan Yang3, Maik Hüttemann1,3,6, Lawrence I Grossman1,3.
Abstract
Cytochrome c oxidase (COX), the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, plays a key role in regulating mitochondrial energy production and cell survival. COX subunit VIIa polypeptide 2-like protein (COX7AR) is a novel COX subunit that was recently found to be involved in mitochondrial supercomplex assembly and mitochondrial respiration activity. Here, we report that COX7AR is expressed in high energy-demanding tissues, such as brain, heart, liver, and aggressive forms of human breast cancer cells. Under cellular stress that stimulates energy metabolism, COX7AR is induced and incorporated into the mitochondrial COX complex. Functionally, COX7AR promotes cellular energy production in human mammary epithelial cells. Gain- and loss-of-function analysis demonstrates that COX7AR is required for human breast cancer cells to maintain higher rates of proliferation, clone formation, and invasion. In summary, our study revealed that COX7AR is a stress-inducible mitochondrial COX subunit that facilitates human breast cancer malignancy. These findings have important implications in the understanding and treatment of human breast cancer and the diseases associated with mitochondrial energy metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27550821 PMCID: PMC4994049 DOI: 10.1038/srep31742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Western blot analysis of COX7AR in mouse liver, muscle and heart tissues. T, total cell lysates; M, mitochondrial protein fraction. (b) Expression of Cox7ar mRNA in mouse embryonic fibroblasts without (Ctl) or with the treatment of vehicle (Veh), thapsigargin (Tg, 0.2 μM), or tunicamycin (Tm, 5 μg/ml) for 8 and 24 h. Fold-change of mRNA was determined by quantitative real-time PCR. (c) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of COX7AR mRNA levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive or -negative human breast cancer cell lines. Expression values were normalized to β-actin. Fold changes of mRNA levels are shown by comparison to that of MCF10A cells. (d) Western blotting analysis of COX7AR protein expression in some representative breast cancer cell lines. β-actin was included as a protein loading control.
Figure 2(a) Protein sequence analysis for human COX7AR protein. (b) Immunofluorescent analysis for COX7AR localization before and after Tg (0.2 μM) treatment for 8 h. CHO cells were transfected with plasmids expressing flag-tagged human COX7AR. Cells were stained with MitoTracker Red for mitochondria. COX7AR protein was detected via green fluorescence (Magnification ×600). (c) Immunofluorescent analysis for COX7AR localization in mouse primary hepatocytes. Cells were stained with MitoTracker Red for mitochondria. The endogenous COX7AR protein was stained with the anti-COX7AR antibody for green fluorescence (Magnification ×600). (d) 2-D Western blot analysis of COX7AR in mitochondria-enriched mouse liver protein fractions. (e) Presence of COX7AR in the COX enzyme purified from bovine heart without (control) or with 1 h of ischemic stress (ischemia) was detected by Western blot with an anti-COX7AR antibody. COX subunit 4 was used as loading control.
Figure 3Microarray analysis with COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A stable cell lines under ischemic/hypoxic stress.
COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A stable cell lines were cultured under the non-stressed or ischemic/hypoxic stress for 90 min before isolation of total RNA followed by Illumina microarray analysis. (a) The microarray heatmap and top 27 functionally characterized genes whose expression were significantly altered in the COX7AR-expressing cells, compared to those in the LacZ-expressing cells under control or ischemic/hypoxic stress condition. (b) Fold changes of the transcripts encoded by the genes that were up- or down-regulated in the COX7AR-expressing MCF10A cells under the non-stressed or ischemic/hypoxic stress conditions. As described in the method session, False Discovery Rate (FDR) test was used for multiple corrections (cut-off p-value ≤ 0.05) and a fold change criterion (cut-off value >2) to determine differential gene expression. The genes whose expression was significantly altered between COX7AR- and LacZ-expressing MCF10A cells were included. (c) Functional clusters of genes whose expression were significantly altered in the MCF10A cells upon expression of exogenous COX7AR.
Figure 4COX activities and ATP levels in the COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A stable cell lines under non-stressed conditions or after Tg (0.5 μM) treatment for 6 h.
(a,b) COX specific activities, shown as O2 consumption rate after titrating with increasing amounts of substrate cytochrome c (Cyt C) in solubilized COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A cells under non-stressed conditions (a) or after 6-h Tg treatment (b). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 biological repeats). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (c) Amounts of ATP produced by the COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A cells under the non-stressed condition or after 6-h Tg treatment. (d) Proliferation rates of COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing MCF10A stable cell lines determined by Cell Titer Aqueous Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4 biological repeats). **P ≤ 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5(a) IP-Western blot analysis of the COX7AR levels in the stable human breast cancer cell line SUM159 that was transduced by lentivirus expressing COX7AR or LacZ. Total cellular lysates were subjected to pull-down using the anti-COX7AR antibody to enrich for COX7AR protein, followed by Western blot analysis using the same antibody. The levels of IgG heavy chain were included as loading controls. (b) Proliferation rates of COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing SUM129 stable cell lines determined by Cell Titer Aqueous Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 4 biological repeats). *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (c) Clone formation of the COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing SUM129 cells in Matrigel. (d) Quantification of clone formation by SUM159-LacZ and SUM159-COX7AR cells in Matrigel. The clone numbers in a random field of the same size per sample were calculated. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 biological repeats). **p ≤ 0.01. (e) Morphology of SUM159-LacZ and SUM159-COX7AR cell clones in Matrigel (Magnification is ×400). (f) Invasion assay of the COX7AR- or LacZ-expressing SUM129 cells in Matrigel. Experiments were repeated three times, and representative images are shown. (g) Quantitative analysis of SUM159-LacZ and SUM159-COX7AR cell invasion in Matrigel. The invaded cell numbers in a random field of the same size per sample were calculated. Data are presented as means ± SEM (n = 5 biological repeats). **P < 0.01.
Figure 6(a) Proliferation rates of COX7AR-knockdown and control SUM225 stable cell lines were determined by Cell Titer Aqueous Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega). Two COX7AR-knockdown SUM225 stable cell lines were generated by transducing lentivirus expressing COX7AR shRNA. SUM225 cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing non-silencing shRNA as the control. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 biological repeats). *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01. (b) Clone formation of the COX7AR-knockdown or non-silencing shRNA control SUM225 cells in Matrigel. (c) Quantification of clone formation by nonsilencing SUM225 control and COX7AR-knockdown SUM225 cells in Matrigel. The clone numbers in a random field of the same size per sample were calculated. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3 biological repeats). *p ≤ 0.05.