Literature DB >> 27550775

Evaluation of CROES Nephrolithometry Nomogram as a Preoperative Predictive System for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes.

Sumit Kumar1, Jayaram Sreenivas1, Vilvapathy Senguttuvan Karthikeyan1, Ashwin Mallya1, Ramaiah Keshavamurthy1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Scoring systems have been devised to predict outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). CROES nephrolithometry nomogram (CNN) is the latest tool devised to predict stone-free rate (SFR). We aim to compare predictive accuracy of CNN against Guy stone score (GSS) for SFR and postoperative outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2015, 313 patients undergoing PCNL were analyzed for predictive accuracy of GSS, CNN, and stone burden (SB) for SFR, complications, operation time (OT), and length of hospitalization (LOH). We further stratified patients into risk groups based on CNN and GSS.
RESULTS: Mean ± standard deviation (SD) SB was 298.8 ± 235.75 mm2. SB, GSS, and CNN (area under curve [AUC]: 0.662, 0.660, 0.673) were found to be predictors of SFR. However, predictability for complications was not as good (AUC: SB 0.583, GSS 0.554, CNN 0.580). Single implicated calix (Adj. OR 3.644; p = 0.027), absence of staghorn calculus (Adj. OR 3.091; p = 0.044), single stone (Adj. OR 3.855; p = 0.002), and single puncture (Adj. OR 2.309; p = 0.048) significantly predicted SFR on multivariate analysis. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; p = 0.020) and staghorn calculus (p = 0.002) were independent predictors for complications on linear regression. SB and GSS independently predicted OT on multivariate analysis. SB and complications significantly predicted LOH, while GSS and CNN did not predict LOH. CNN offered better risk stratification for residual stones than GSS.
CONCLUSION: CNN and GSS have good preoperative predictive accuracy for SFR. Number of implicated calices may affect SFR, and CCI affects complications. Studies should incorporate these factors in scoring systems and assess if predictability of PCNL outcomes improves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CROES nephrolithometry nomogram; Guy stone score; complications; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; stone burden; stone-free rate

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27550775     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of STONE, CROES and Guy's nephrolithometry scoring systems for predicting stone-free status and complication rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Fatih Yanaral; Metin Savun; Harun Ozdemir; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Predictability and Practicality of Image-Based Scoring Systems for Patient Assessment and Outcome Stratification During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Contemporary Update.

Authors:  Linda My Huynh; Erica Huang; Roshan M Patel; Zhamshid Okhunov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Comparison of CROES, S.T.O.N.E, and Guy's scoring systems for the prediction of stone-free status and complication rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fatih Yanaral; Faruk Ozgor; Metin Savun; Murat Sahan; Omer Sarilar; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.370

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.