Hannah E Kirk1, Kylie M Gray2, Kirsten Ellis3, John Taffe2, Kim M Cornish1. 1. Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Developmental Psychology & Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 3. Department of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) experience heightened attention difficulties which have been linked to poorer cognitive, academic and social outcomes. Although, increasing research has focused on the potential of computerised cognitive training in reducing attention problems, limited studies have assessed whether this intervention could be utilised for those with IDD. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a computerised attention training programme in children with IDD. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled trial, children (n = 76; IQ < 75) aged 4-11 years were assigned to an adaptive attention training condition or a nonadaptive control condition. Both conditions were completed at home over a 5-week period and consisted of 25 sessions, each of 20-min duration. Outcome measures (baseline, posttraining and 3-month follow-up) assessed core attention skills (selective attention, sustained attention and attentional control) and inattentive/hyperactive behaviour. RESULTS: Children in the attention training condition showed greater improvement in selective attention performance compared to children in the control condition (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI 0.02, 0.45). These improvements were maintained 3 months after training had ceased (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI 0.04, 0.48). The attention training programme was not effective in promoting improvements in sustained attention, attentional control or inattentive/hyperactive behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that attention training may enhance some aspects of attention (selective attention) in children with IDD, but the small to medium effect sizes indicate that further refinement of the training programme is needed to promote larger, more global improvements.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) experience heightened attention difficulties which have been linked to poorer cognitive, academic and social outcomes. Although, increasing research has focused on the potential of computerised cognitive training in reducing attention problems, limited studies have assessed whether this intervention could be utilised for those with IDD. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a computerised attention training programme in children with IDD. METHODS: In a double-blind randomised controlled trial, children (n = 76; IQ < 75) aged 4-11 years were assigned to an adaptive attention training condition or a nonadaptive control condition. Both conditions were completed at home over a 5-week period and consisted of 25 sessions, each of 20-min duration. Outcome measures (baseline, posttraining and 3-month follow-up) assessed core attention skills (selective attention, sustained attention and attentional control) and inattentive/hyperactive behaviour. RESULTS:Children in the attention training condition showed greater improvement in selective attention performance compared to children in the control condition (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI 0.02, 0.45). These improvements were maintained 3 months after training had ceased (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI 0.04, 0.48). The attention training programme was not effective in promoting improvements in sustained attention, attentional control or inattentive/hyperactive behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that attention training may enhance some aspects of attention (selective attention) in children with IDD, but the small to medium effect sizes indicate that further refinement of the training programme is needed to promote larger, more global improvements.
Authors: Marjorie Solomon; Andrew Gordon; Ana-Maria Iosif; Raphael Geddert; Marie K Krug; Peter Mundy; David Hessl Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Rafael E Reigal; Fernando González-Guirval; Juan P Morillo-Baro; Verónica Morales-Sánchez; Rocío Juárez-Ruiz de Mier; Antonio Hernández-Mendo Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Nicole Gough; Lea Brkan; Ponnusamy Subramaniam; Lina Chiuccariello; Alessandra De Petrillo; Benoit H Mulsant; Christopher R Bowie; Tarek K Rajji Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: In Young Sung; Jae Yong Jeon; Ki Jeong Yun; Jin Sook Yuk; Eun Me Byun; Han-Wook Yoo; Tae-Sung Ko; Hyo-Won Kim; Dae-Hyun Jang Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.817