Literature DB >> 27550575

Confounding effects of spatial variation on shifts in phenology.

Charlotte W de Keyzer1,2, Nicole E Rafferty1,2, David W Inouye2,3, James D Thomson1,2.   

Abstract

Shifts in the timing of life history events have become an important source of information about how organisms are responding to climate change. Phenological data have generally been treated as purely temporal, with scant attention to the inherent spatial aspects of such data. However, phenological data are tied to a specific location, and considerations of sampling design, both over space and through time, can critically affect the patterns that emerge. Focusing on flowering phenology, we describe how purely spatial shifts, such as adding new study plots, or the colonization of a study plot by a new species, can masquerade as temporal shifts. Such shifts can look like responses to climate change but are not. Furthermore, the same aggregate phenological curves can be composed of individuals with either very different or very similar phenologies. We conclude with a set of recommendations to avoid ambiguities arising from the spatiotemporal duality of phenological data.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  zzm321990Cardamine cordifoliazzm321990; Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; climate change; flowering time; long-term data; phenology; spatial ecology; temporal ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27550575     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  The evolution of flowering phenology: an example from the wind-pollinated African Restionaceae.

Authors:  H Peter Linder
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Phenological shifts conserve thermal niches in North American birds and reshape expectations for climate-driven range shifts.

Authors:  Jacob B Socolar; Peter N Epanchin; Steven R Beissinger; Morgan W Tingley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Plant-pollinator interactions under climate change: The use of spatial and temporal transplants.

Authors:  Eva M Morton; Nicole E Rafferty
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 4.  It's about time: A synthesis of changing phenology in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem.

Authors:  Michelle D Staudinger; Katherine E Mills; Karen Stamieszkin; Nicholas R Record; Christine A Hudak; Andrew Allyn; Antony Diamond; Kevin D Friedland; Walt Golet; Meghan Elisabeth Henderson; Christina M Hernandez; Thomas G Huntington; Rubao Ji; Catherine L Johnson; David Samuel Johnson; Adrian Jordaan; John Kocik; Yun Li; Matthew Liebman; Owen C Nichols; Daniel Pendleton; R Anne Richards; Thomas Robben; Andrew C Thomas; Harvey J Walsh; Keenan Yakola
Journal:  Fish Oceanogr       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.786

5.  Estimating flowering transition dates from status-based phenological observations: a test of methods.

Authors:  Shawn D Taylor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Consistent trait-temperature interactions drive butterfly phenology in both incidental and survey data.

Authors:  Elise A Larsen; Michael W Belitz; Robert P Guralnick; Leslie Ries
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Decadal-scale phenology and seasonal climate drivers of migratory baleen whales in a rapidly warming marine ecosystem.

Authors:  Daniel E Pendleton; Morgan W Tingley; Laura C Ganley; Kevin D Friedland; Charles Mayo; Moira W Brown; Brigid E McKenna; Adrian Jordaan; Michelle D Staudinger
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 13.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.