Literature DB >> 27550347

Activity of Tedizolid in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Foreign Body-Associated Osteomyelitis.

Kyung-Hwa Park1,2, Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance1, Jayawant Mandrekar3, Robin Patel4,5.   

Abstract

We compared tedizolid alone and tedizolid with rifampin to rifampin and vancomycin plus rifampin in a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) foreign body-associated osteomyelitis. The study strain was a prosthetic joint infection-associated isolate. Steady-state pharmacokinetics for intraperitoneal administration of tedizolid, vancomycin, and rifampin were determined in uninfected rats. MRSA was inoculated into the proximal tibia, and a wire was implanted. Four weeks later, the rats were treated intraperitoneally for 21 days with tedizolid (n = 14), tedizolid plus rifampin (n = 11), rifampin (n = 16), or vancomycin plus rifampin (n = 13). Seventeen rats received no treatment. After treatment, quantitative bone cultures were performed. Blood was obtained for determination of drug trough concentrations in the tedizolid and tedizolid plus rifampin groups. The mean peak plasma concentration and mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 h for tedizolid were 12 μg/ml and 60 μg · h/ml, respectively. The bacterial loads in all treatment groups were significantly lower than those in the control group; those in the tedizolid- plus rifampin-treated animals were not significantly different from those in the vancomycin- plus rifampin-treated animals. The range of mean plasma trough concentrations in the tedizolid group was 0.44 to 0.73 μg/ml. Although neither tedizolid nor vancomycin resistance was detected in isolates recovered from bones, rifampin resistance was detected in 10 animals (63%) in the rifampin group, 8 animals (73%) in the tedizolid plus rifampin group, and a single animal (8%) in the vancomycin plus rifampin group. Tedizolid alone or tedizolid combined with rifampin was active in a rat model of MRSA foreign body-associated osteomyelitis. The emergence of rifampin resistance was noted in animals receiving tedizolid plus rifampin.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27550347      PMCID: PMC5075060          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01248-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

Review 1.  Relationship between vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, high vancomycin MIC, and outcome in serious S. aureus infections.

Authors:  Natasha E Holmes; Paul D R Johnson; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Penetration of linezolid into soft tissues of healthy volunteers after single and multiple doses.

Authors:  Pejman Dehghanyar; Cornelia Bürger; Markus Zeitlinger; Florian Islinger; Florian Kovar; Markus Müller; Charlotte Kloft; Christian Joukhadar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro activity of tedizolid against staphylococci isolated from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Kerryl E Greenwood Quaintance; Melissa J Karau; Robin Patel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  Early experience with tedizolid: clinical efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and resistance.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rybak; Kayleigh Marx; Craig A Martin
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 5.  Emerging antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Their treatment in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  K L Garvin; S H Hinrichs; J A Urban
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Nonclinical and pharmacokinetic assessments to evaluate the potential of tedizolid and linezolid to affect mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Shawn Flanagan; Edward E McKee; Debaditya Das; Paul M Tulkens; Hiromi Hosako; Jill Fiedler-Kelly; Julie Passarell; Ann Radovsky; Philippe Prokocimer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Therapeutic drug monitoring may improve safety outcomes of long-term treatment with linezolid in adult patients.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Piergiorgio Cojutti; Barbara Del Pin; Eleonora Zamparini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 8.  Linezolid: safety and efficacy in special populations.

Authors:  F Kate Gould
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 9.  Tedizolid for the management of human infections: in vitro characteristics.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Locke; Gary E Zurenko; Karen Joy Shaw; Kenneth Bartizal
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  In vitro activity of tedizolid against linezolid-resistant staphylococci and enterococci.

Authors:  Stephanie L Silva-Del Toro; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Robin Patel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  10 in total

1.  Survival of Staphylococcus epidermidis in Fibroblasts and Osteoblasts.

Authors:  Kimberly Perez; Robin Patel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Activity of Tedizolid in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Experimental Foreign Body-Associated Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwa Park; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Audrey N Schuetz; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Tedizolid as Step-Down Therapy following Daptomycin versus Continuation of Daptomycin against Enterococci and Methicillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Rat Endocarditis Model.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Understanding Biofilms and Novel Approaches to the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Medical Device-Associated Infections.

Authors:  Yu Mi Wi; Robin Patel
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 5.982

Review 6.  Pathogenic Mechanisms and Host Interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis Device-Related Infection.

Authors:  Marina Sabaté Brescó; Llinos G Harris; Keith Thompson; Barbara Stanic; Mario Morgenstern; Liam O'Mahony; R Geoff Richards; T Fintan Moriarty
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Tedizolid phosphate for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Nadia Castaldo; Alessia Carnelutti; Maddalena Peghin; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2019-07-05

8.  Long-Term Use of Tedizolid in Osteoarticular Infections: Benefits among Oxazolidinone Drugs.

Authors:  Eva Benavent; Laura Morata; Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal; Esteban Alberto Reynaga; Laura Soldevila; Laia Albiach; Maria Luisa Pedro-Botet; Ariadna Padullés; Alex Soriano; Oscar Murillo
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 9.  Role of Animal Models to Advance Research of Bacterial Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Caroline Billings; David E Anderson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

10.  Activity of Omadacycline in Rat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Scott A Cunningham; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Bobbi S Pritt; Tiffany R Keepers; Alisa W Serio; Surya Chitra; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.