Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri1, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda2, Tali Elfassy1, Anne Lee2, Michelle C Odden3, Divya Thekkethala3, Clinton B Wright4,5, Maria M Glymour2, Mary N Haan2. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Florida. 2. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco. 3. College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis. 4. Department of Neurology, Miller School of Medicine and. 5. Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Walking speed is associated with functional status and all-cause mortality. Yet the relationship between walking speed and stroke, also a leading cause of disability, remains poorly understood, especially in older Latino adults who suffer from a significant burden of stroke. METHODS: A total of 1,486 stroke-free participants from the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging, aged 60 and older at baseline in 1998-1999, were followed annually through 2010. Participants reported their usual walking speed outdoors which was classified into slow, medium, or fast. We also assessed timed tandem walk ability (unable or eight or more errors vs less than eight errors). We ascertained three incident stroke endpoints: total stroke, nonfatal stroke, and fatal stroke. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke at different walking speed and timed tandem walk categories. RESULTS: Over an average of 6 years of follow-up (SD = 2.8), the incidence rate of total strokes was 23.2/1,000 person-years for slow walkers compared to 15.6/1,000 person-years for medium walkers, and 7.6/1,000 person-years for fast walkers. In Cox models adjusted for sociodemographics, cardiovascular risk, cognition and functional status, and self-rated health, the hazard of total stroke was 31% lower for medium walkers (HR: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47, 1.02) and 56% lower for fast walkers (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.82) compared with slow walkers. We found similar associations with timed tandem walk ability (fully adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest perceived walking speed captures more than self-rated health alone and is a strong risk factor for stroke risk in Latino older adults.
BACKGROUND: Walking speed is associated with functional status and all-cause mortality. Yet the relationship between walking speed and stroke, also a leading cause of disability, remains poorly understood, especially in older Latino adults who suffer from a significant burden of stroke. METHODS: A total of 1,486 stroke-free participants from the Sacramento Area Latino Study on Aging, aged 60 and older at baseline in 1998-1999, were followed annually through 2010. Participants reported their usual walking speed outdoors which was classified into slow, medium, or fast. We also assessed timed tandem walk ability (unable or eight or more errors vs less than eight errors). We ascertained three incident stroke endpoints: total stroke, nonfatal stroke, and fatal stroke. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke at different walking speed and timed tandem walk categories. RESULTS: Over an average of 6 years of follow-up (SD = 2.8), the incidence rate of total strokes was 23.2/1,000 person-years for slow walkers compared to 15.6/1,000 person-years for medium walkers, and 7.6/1,000 person-years for fast walkers. In Cox models adjusted for sociodemographics, cardiovascular risk, cognition and functional status, and self-rated health, the hazard of total stroke was 31% lower for medium walkers (HR: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47, 1.02) and 56% lower for fast walkers (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.82) compared with slow walkers. We found similar associations with timed tandem walk ability (fully adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest perceived walking speed captures more than self-rated health alone and is a strong risk factor for stroke risk in Latino older adults.
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Jennifer C Cornman; Emily M Agree; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Vincent Mor; Brenda C Spillman; Robert Wallace; Douglas A Wolf Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Joan Vermeulen; Jacques C L Neyens; Erik van Rossum; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Luc P de Witte Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Carlos J Rodriguez; Matthew Allison; Martha L Daviglus; Carmen R Isasi; Colleen Keller; Enrique C Leira; Latha Palaniappan; Ileana L Piña; Sarah M Ramirez; Beatriz Rodriguez; Mario Sims Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Aileen P McGinn; Robert C Kaplan; Joe Verghese; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Bruce M Psaty; Alison E Baird; John K Lynch; Philip A Wolf; Charles Kooperberg; Joseph C Larson; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Susan A Everson-Rose; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Nicholas S Roetker; Pamela L Lutsey; Alvaro Alonso Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Xiao Hu; Yejin Mok; Ning Ding; Kevin J Sullivan; Pamela L Lutsey; Jennifer A Schrack; Priya Palta; Kunihiro Matsushita Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 6.106