Literature DB >> 27548766

Efficacy of Folic Acid Therapy on the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: The Renal Substudy of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial.

Xin Xu1, Xianhui Qin1, Youbao Li1, Danhua Sun1, Jun Wang1, Min Liang1, Binyan Wang1, Yong Huo2, Fan Fan Hou1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The efficacy of folic acid therapy on renal outcomes has not been previously investigated in populations without folic acid fortification.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether treatment with enalapril and folic acid is more effective in slowing renal function decline than enalapril alone across a spectrum of renal function at baseline from normal to moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) among Chinese adults with hypertension. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this substudy of eligible China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT), 15 104 participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater, including 1671 patients with CKD, were recruited from 20 communities in Jiangsu province in China.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive a single tablet daily containing 10 mg enalapril and 0.8 mg folic acid (n = 7545) or 10 mg enalapril alone (n = 7559). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the progression of CKD, defined as a decrease in eGFR of 30% or more and to a level of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 if the baseline eGFR was 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or more, or a decrease in eGFR of 50% or more if the baseline eGFR was less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; or end-stage renal disease. Secondary outcomes included a composite of the primary outcome and all-cause death, rapid decline in renal function, and rate of eGFR decline.
RESULTS: Overall, 15 104 Chinese adults with a mean (range) age of 60 (45-75) years were recruited; median follow-up was 4.4 years. There were 164 and 132 primary events in the enalapril group and the enalapril-folic acid group, respectively. Compared with the enalapril group, the enalapril-folic acid group had a 21% reduction in the odds of the primary event (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00) and a slower rate of eGFR decline (1.28% vs 1.42% per year; P = .02). Among the participants with CKD at baseline, folic acid therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the risks for the primary event (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75), rapid decline in renal function (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47-0.96) and the composite event (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90), and a 44% slower decline in renal function (0.96% vs 1.72% per year, P < .001). Among those without CKD at baseline, there was no between-group difference in the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Enalapril-folic acid therapy, compared with enalapril alone, can significantly delay the progression of CKD among patients with mild-to-moderate CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00794885.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27548766     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  40 in total

1.  Homocysteine and chronic kidney disease: an ongoing narrative.

Authors:  Alessandra F Perna; Diego Ingrosso
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 2.  The role of the intestinal microbiota in uremic solute accumulation: a focus on sulfur compounds.

Authors:  Alessandra F Perna; Griet Glorieux; Miriam Zacchia; Francesco Trepiccione; Giovanna Capolongo; Carmela Vigorito; Evgeniya Anishchenko; Diego Ingrosso
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Nutrition: Folic acid delays CKD progression.

Authors:  Ellen F Carney
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 4.  Global case studies for chronic kidney disease/end-stage kidney disease care.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Yang; David C H Harris; Valerie A Luyckx; Masaomi Nangaku; Fan Fan Hou; Guillermo Garcia Garcia; Hasan Abu-Aisha; Abdou Niang; Laura Sola; Sakarn Bunnag; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Kriang Tungsanga; Marie Richards; Nick Richards; Bak Leong Goh; Gavin Dreyer; Rhys Evans; Henry Mzingajira; Ahmed Twahir; Mignon I McCulloch; Curie Ahn; Charlotte Osafo; Hsiang-Hao Hsu; Lianne Barnieh; Jo-Ann Donner; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2020-02-19

5.  Influence of renal function on the association between homocysteine level and risk of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Fan-Zhen Kong; Xiao-Feng Dong; Qin-Rong Xu; Qian Gui; Wei Wang; Hong-Xuan Feng; Wei-Feng Luo; Zong-En Gao; Guan-Hui Wu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  Homocysteine-lowering interventions for preventing cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ivan Solà; Dimitrios Lathyris; Mark Dayer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-17

7.  The relationship between the concentration of plasma homocysteine and chronic kidney disease: a cross sectional study of a large cohort.

Authors:  Eytan Cohen; Ili Margalit; Tzippy Shochat; Elad Goldberg; Ilan Krause
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 8.  Current Uses of Dietary Therapy for Patients with Far-Advanced CKD.

Authors:  Norio Hanafusa; Bereket Tessema Lodebo; Joel D Kopple
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Hyperhomocysteinemia increases the risk of chronic kidney disease in a Chinese middle-aged and elderly population-based cohort.

Authors:  Xianglei Kong; Xiaojing Ma; Chengyin Zhang; Hong Su; Dongmei Xu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Deleting Death and Dialysis: Conservative Care of Cardio-Vascular Risk and Kidney Function Loss in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Steven Van Laecke; Griet Glorieux; Francis Verbeke; Esmeralda Castillo-Rodriguez; Alberto Ortiz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.