Brian A Gordon1, Tyler Blazey2, Yi Su3, Anne M Fagan4, David M Holtzman5, John C Morris6, Tammie L S Benzinger7. 1. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri2Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri4Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri5Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri3Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri4Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri5Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri4Department of Neurology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 7. Department of Radiology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri2Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri6Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) can be staged using a 2-factor model denoting the presence or absence of β-amyloid (Aβ+/-) and neurodegeneration (ND+/-). The association of these stages with longitudinal biomarker outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether longitudinal Aβ accumulation and hippocampal atrophy differ based on initial preclinical staging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This longitudinal population-based cohort study used data collected at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, from December 1, 2006, to June 31, 2015. Cognitively normal older adults (n = 174) were recruited from the longitudinal Adult Children Study and Healthy Aging and Senile Dementia Study at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center. At baseline, all participants had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, positron emission tomography (PET) scans with carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), and cerebrospinal fluid assays of tau and phosphorylated tau (ptau) acquired within 12 months. Using the baseline biomarkers, individuals were classified into preclinical stage 0 (Aβ-/ND-), 1 (Aβ+/ND-), or 2+ (Aβ+/ND+) or suspected non-AD pathophysiology (SNAP; Aβ-/ND+). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Subsequent longitudinal accumulation of Aβ assessed with PiB PET and loss of hippocampal volume assessed with MRI in each group. RESULTS: Among the 174 participants (81 men [46.6%]; 93 women [53.4%]; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [8.9] years), a proportion (14%-17%) of individuals with neurodegeneration alone (SNAP) later demonstrated Aβ+. The rates of Aβ accumulation and loss of hippocampal volume in individuals with SNAP were indistinguishable from those without any pathologic features at baseline (for Aβ accumulation: when hippocampal volume was used to define ND, t = 0.00 [P > .99]; when tau and ptau were used to define ND, t = -0.02 [P = .98]; for loss of hippocampal volume: when hippocampal volume was used to define ND, t = -1.34 [P = .18]; when tau and ptau were used to define ND, t = 0.84 [P = .40]). Later preclinical stages (stages 1 and 2+) had elevated Aβ accumulation. Using hippocampal volume to define ND, individuals with stage 1 had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 11.06; P < .001), stage 2+ (t = 2.10; P = .04), and SNAP (t = 9.32; P < .001), and those with stage 2+ had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 4.38; P < .001) and SNAP (t = 4.08; P < .001). When ND was defined using tau and ptau, individuals with stage 2+ had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 4.96) and SNAP (t = 4.06), and those with stage 1 had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 8.44) and SNAP (t = 6.61) (P < .001 for all comparisons). When ND was defined using cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, individuals with stage 2+ had accelerated hippocampal atrophy relative to stage 0 (t = -3.41; P < .001), stage 1 (t = -2.48; P = .03), and SNAP (t = -2.26; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More advanced preclinical stages of AD have greater longitudinal Aβ accumulation. SNAP appears most likely to capture inherent individual variability in brain structure or to represent comorbid pathologic features rather than early emerging AD. Low hippocampal volumes or elevated levels of tau or ptau in isolation may not accurately represent ongoing neurodegenerative processes.
IMPORTANCE: Preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) can be staged using a 2-factor model denoting the presence or absence of β-amyloid (Aβ+/-) and neurodegeneration (ND+/-). The association of these stages with longitudinal biomarker outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether longitudinal Aβ accumulation and hippocampal atrophy differ based on initial preclinical staging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This longitudinal population-based cohort study used data collected at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, from December 1, 2006, to June 31, 2015. Cognitively normal older adults (n = 174) were recruited from the longitudinal Adult Children Study and Healthy Aging and Senile Dementia Study at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center. At baseline, all participants had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, positron emission tomography (PET) scans with carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), and cerebrospinal fluid assays of tau and phosphorylated tau (ptau) acquired within 12 months. Using the baseline biomarkers, individuals were classified into preclinical stage 0 (Aβ-/ND-), 1 (Aβ+/ND-), or 2+ (Aβ+/ND+) or suspected non-AD pathophysiology (SNAP; Aβ-/ND+). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Subsequent longitudinal accumulation of Aβ assessed with PiB PET and loss of hippocampal volume assessed with MRI in each group. RESULTS: Among the 174 participants (81 men [46.6%]; 93 women [53.4%]; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [8.9] years), a proportion (14%-17%) of individuals with neurodegeneration alone (SNAP) later demonstrated Aβ+. The rates of Aβ accumulation and loss of hippocampal volume in individuals with SNAP were indistinguishable from those without any pathologic features at baseline (for Aβ accumulation: when hippocampal volume was used to define ND, t = 0.00 [P > .99]; when tau and ptau were used to define ND, t = -0.02 [P = .98]; for loss of hippocampal volume: when hippocampal volume was used to define ND, t = -1.34 [P = .18]; when tau and ptau were used to define ND, t = 0.84 [P = .40]). Later preclinical stages (stages 1 and 2+) had elevated Aβ accumulation. Using hippocampal volume to define ND, individuals with stage 1 had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 11.06; P < .001), stage 2+ (t = 2.10; P = .04), and SNAP (t = 9.32; P < .001), and those with stage 2+ had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 4.38; P < .001) and SNAP (t = 4.08; P < .001). When ND was defined using tau and ptau, individuals with stage 2+ had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 4.96) and SNAP (t = 4.06), and those with stage 1 had accelerated Aβ accumulation relative to stage 0 (t = 8.44) and SNAP (t = 6.61) (P < .001 for all comparisons). When ND was defined using cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, individuals with stage 2+ had accelerated hippocampal atrophy relative to stage 0 (t = -3.41; P < .001), stage 1 (t = -2.48; P = .03), and SNAP (t = -2.26; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: More advanced preclinical stages of AD have greater longitudinal Aβ accumulation. SNAP appears most likely to capture inherent individual variability in brain structure or to represent comorbid pathologic features rather than early emerging AD. Low hippocampal volumes or elevated levels of tau or ptau in isolation may not accurately represent ongoing neurodegenerative processes.
Authors: Stephanie Jb Vos; Chengjie Xiong; Pieter Jelle Visser; Mateusz S Jasielec; Jason Hassenstab; Elizabeth A Grant; Nigel J Cairns; John C Morris; David M Holtzman; Anne M Fagan Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Harald Hampel; José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Steven T DeKosky; Serge Gauthier; Dennis Selkoe; Randall Bateman; Stefano Cappa; Sebastian Crutch; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; Marie-Odile Habert; Gregory A Jicha; Agneta Nordberg; Florence Pasquier; Gil Rabinovici; Philippe Robert; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Marie Sarazin; Stéphane Epelbaum; Leonardo C de Souza; Bruno Vellas; Pieter J Visser; Lon Schneider; Yaakov Stern; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Cummings Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y C Xu; S C Waring; P C O'Brien; E G Tangalos; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yi Su; Tyler M Blazey; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Daniel S Marcus; Beau M Ances; Randall J Bateman; Nigel J Cairns; Patricia Aldea; Lisa Cash; Jon J Christensen; Karl Friedrichsen; Russ C Hornbeck; Angela M Farrar; Christopher J Owen; Richard Mayeux; Adam M Brickman; William Klunk; Julie C Price; Paul M Thompson; Bernadino Ghetti; Andrew J Saykin; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Peter R Schofield; Virginia Buckles; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Stephen D Weigand; Walter A Rocca; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Gregory M Preboske; Vernon S Pankratz; Prashanthi Vemuri; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Val J Lowe; Patrick J Peller; Stephen D Weigand; Catalina Montoya Quintero; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Prashanthi Vemuri; Matthew L Senjem; Lennon Jordan; Clifford R Jack; David Knopman; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; David S Knopman; Prashanthi Vemuri; Michelle M Mielke; Stephen D Weigand; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Val Lowe; Brian E Gregg; Vernon S Pankratz; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefanie Schreiber; Frank Schreiber; Samuel N Lockhart; Andy Horng; Alexandre Bejanin; Susan M Landau; William J Jagust Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Christine L Tardif; Gabriel A Devenyi; Robert S C Amaral; Sandra Pelleieux; Judes Poirier; Pedro Rosa-Neto; John Breitner; M Mallar Chakravarty Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Nirubol Tosakulwong; Stephen D Weigand; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Mary M Machulda; Hugo Botha; Rene L Utianski; Christopher G Schwarz; Matthew L Senjem; Edythe A Strand; Nilufer Ertekin-Taner; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Marina Buciuc; Alexandra M Wennberg; Stephen D Weigand; Melissa E Murray; Matthew L Senjem; Anthony J Spychalla; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci; Joseph E Parisi; Dennis W Dickson; Ronald C Petersen; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: John C Morris; Suzanne E Schindler; Lena M McCue; Krista L Moulder; Tammie L S Benzinger; Carlos Cruchaga; Anne M Fagan; Elizabeth Grant; Brian A Gordon; David M Holtzman; Chengjie Xiong Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Yujing Zhao; Dana L Tudorascu; Oscar L Lopez; Ann D Cohen; Chester A Mathis; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie C Price; Lewis H Kuller; M Ilyas Kamboh; Steven T DeKosky; William E Klunk; Beth E Snitz Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302