| Literature DB >> 27548258 |
Truong-Minh Pham1, John Paul Ekwaru1, Silmara S Mastroeni1, Marco F Mastroeni1, Sarah A Loehr1, Paul J Veugelers1.
Abstract
Both lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and elevated homocysteine concentrations are potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). A recent analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported an inverse association of serum 25(OH)D with homocysteine, however, the longitudinal relationship has yet to be investigated. We hypothesized and examined whether a temporal increase in 25(OH)D concentrations is paralleled by a reduction in the risk for elevated homocysteine. We analyzed data of 4475 participants with repeated assessments of serum 25(OH)D and homocysteine concentrations who enrolled in a preventive health program that encourages vitamin D supplementation and monitors serum 25(OH)D and homocysteine concentrations. We defined elevated homocysteine as concentrations greater than 13 micromoles per liter. Logistic regression was applied to assess the association of temporal changes in serum 25(OH)D with the risk of elevated homocysteine. We observed an inverse gradient whereby greater increases in 25(OH)D concentrations were associated with a lower prevalence of elevated homocysteine. Relative to those without temporal increases in 25(OH)D, participants who showed improvements in their serum 25(OH)D concentrations of "<25", "25-50", "50-75", and "≥75" nanomoles per liter at follow up were 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.37), 0.52 (0.33-0.80), 0.34 (0.20-0.58), and 0.32 (0.19-0.54) times as likely to have elevated homocysteine, respectively. These observations suggest that temporal improvements in vitamin D status reduce serum homocysteine concentrations, and therefore may potentially contribute to the primary prevention of CVD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27548258 PMCID: PMC4993504 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161368
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline and follow up characteristics of 4475 study participants.
| Women (n = 2094) | Men (n = 2381) | Both sexes (4475) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow up | Baseline | Follow up | Baseline | Follow up | |
| Mean (SD) | 93 (42) | 124 (47) | 78 (41) | 118 (53) | 85 (42) | 121 (50) |
| Median (IQR) | 86 (65–112) | 118 (91–150) | 70 (50–96) | 110 (79–147) | 77 (57–105) | 113 (85–149) |
| Mean (SD) | 9.2 (3.7) | 7.7 (2.4) | 10.4 (2.9) | 9.2 (2.5) | 9.8 (3.4) | 8.5 (2.6) |
| Median (IQR) | 8.7 (7.3–10.4) | 7.3 (6.2–8.7) | 9.9 (8.5–11.5) | 8.9 (7.6–10.3) | 9.3 (7.9–11.1) | 8.2 (6.8–9.7) |
| 95% percentile | 14.2 | 11.6 | 15.2 | 13.5 | 14.8 | 12.8 |
| 173 (8.3) | 55 (2.3) | 298 (12.5) | 145 (6.1) | 471 (11.0) | 200 (4.5) | |
| 50 (16) | 51 (16) | 46 (14) | 48 (14) | 48 (15) | 49 (15) | |
| <18.5 | 36 (2) | 42 (2) | 6 (<1) | 6 (<1) | 42 (1) | 48 (1) |
| 18.5–<25.0 | 916 (44) | 910 (44) | 500 (22) | 484 (21) | 1416 (32) | 1394 (32) |
| 25.0–<30.0 | 612 (29) | 618 (30) | 1060 (46) | 1066 (46) | 1672 (38) | 1684 (38) |
| > = 30.0 | 509 (25) | 503 (24) | 750 (32) | 760 (33) | 1,259 (29) | 1263 (29) |
| Missing | 21 | 21 | 65 | 65 | 86 | 86 |
| Normal | 1623 (83) | 1624 (85) | 1637 (75) | 1596 (75) | 3260 (79) | 3220 (80) |
| Elevated | 338 (17) | 286 (14) | 550 (25) | 536 (25) | 888 (21) | 822 (20) |
| Missing | 133 | 184 | 194 | 249 | 327 | 433 |
| Normal | 811 (40) | 792 (39) | 735 (33) | 710 (32) | 1546 (36) | 1502 (35) |
| Elevated | 1199 (60) | 1247 (61) | 1523 (67) | 1530 (68) | 2722 (64) | 2777 (65) |
| Missing | 84 | 55 | 123 | 141 | 207 | 196 |
| Deficient/Insufficient | 158 (8.9) | 53 (2.6) | 118 (7.9) | 62 (2.7) | 276 (8.4) | 115 (2.7) |
| Adequate | 1609 (91.1) | 2002 (97.4) | 1384 (92.1) | 2205 (97.3) | 2993 (91.6) | 4207 (97.3) |
| Missing | 327 | 39 | 879 | 114 | 1206 | 153 |
| Never smoker | 929 (61) | 598 (60) | 628 (50) | 653 (52) | 1557 (56) | 1251 (55) |
| Past smoker | 443 (29) | 289 (29) | 336 (27) | 322 (25) | 779 (28) | 611 (27) |
| Current smoker | 160 (10) | 116 (11) | 290 (23) | 294 (23) | 450 (16) | 410 (18) |
| Missing | 562 | 1091 | 1127 | 1112 | 1689 | 2203 |
| Non-drinker | 706 (49) | 737 (52) | 483 (38) | 575 (35) | 1189 (44) | 1312 (43) |
| Drinker | 732 (51) | 682 (48) | 778 (62) | 1067 (65) | 1510 (56) | 1749 (57) |
| Missing | 656 | 675 | 1120 | 739 | 1776 | 1414 |
| Low | 679 (45) | 555 (41) | 442 (36) | 461 (32) | 1121 (40) | 1016 (36) |
| Moderate | 440 (29) | 414 (30) | 373 (30) | 435 (31) | 813 (30) | 849 (30) |
| High | 397 (26) | 396 (29) | 414 (34) | 535 (37) | 811 (30) | 931 (33) |
| Missing | 578 | 729 | 1152 | 950 | 1730 | 1679 |
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; LDL-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; nmol/L, nanomoles per liter; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; μmol/L, micromoles per liter.
a Elevated homocysteine was defined as serum concentrations >13 μmol/L.
b Percentage for these variables do not include missing observations.
c Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg, or a self-report of taking antihypertensive medications;
d Elevated LDL-cholesterol was defined as LDL-cholesterol concentration ≥2.6 mmol/L.
e Vitamin B12 adequacy was defined as serum concentrations >220 picomoles per liter.
Cross sectional associations of serum homocysteine and 25(OH)D concentrations based on baseline observations of 4475 study participants.
| Entire population(n = 4475) | 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L(n = 809) | 25(OH)D ≥50 nmol/L(n = 3666) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | p | β (95% CI) | p | β (95% CI) | p | |
| Univariate | -0.195 (-0.245; -0.145) | <0.01 | -0.979 (-1.607; -0.350) | <0.01 | -0.171 (-0.227; -0.115) | <0.01 |
| Model 1 | -0.212 (-0.261; -0.162) | <0.01 | -1.090 (-1.692; -0.487) | <0.01 | -0.167 (-0.220; -0.115) | <0.01 |
| Model 2 | -0.182 (-0.228; -0.136) | <0.01 | -1.013 (-1.601; -0.425) | <0.01 | -0.148 (-0.197; -0.100) | <0.01 |
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; nmol/L, nanomoles per liter; β (95% CI), beta coefficient with 95% confidence interval. The β coefficients represent the difference in homocysteine concentration in μmol/L per 25 nmol/L difference in 25(OHD) concentrations. Model 1: adjusted for sex, age (per 10 years), body mass index, hypertension, serum LDL-cholesterol, smoking status, alcohol status, and physical activity. Model 2: adjusted for the same covariates as model 1, and additionally adjusted for serum vitamin B12 status.
Fig 1Associations of changes in serum 25(OH)D concentrations with coinciding changes in homocysteine.
μmol/L denotes micromoles per liter; and nmol/L denotes nanomoles per liter.
Associations of change in serum homocysteine and coinciding change in serum 25(OH)D concentrations.
| All observations | Baseline homocysteine < 10 μmol/L | Baseline homocysteine ≥ 10 μmol/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | p | β (95% CI) | p | β (95% CI) | p | |
| Univariate | -0.18 (-0.23; -0.13) | <0.01 | -0.09 (-0.14; -0.03) | <0.01 | -0.28 (-0.36; -0.20) | <0.01 |
| Model 1 | -0.16 (-0.21; -0.12) | <0.01 | -0.9 (-0.14; -0.04) | <0.01 | -0.27 (-0.35; -0.19) | <0.01 |
| Model 2 | -0.15 (-0.20; -0.11) | <0.01 | -0.09 (-0.13; -0.04) | <0.01 | -0.25 (-0.33; -0.18) | <0.01 |
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; μmol/L, micromoles per liter; nmol/L, nanomoles per liter. β (95% CI), Beta coefficient with 95% confidence interval.
a The β coefficients represent the change in homocysteine concentration in μmol/L between baseline and follow up per 25 nmol/L change in 25(OHD) concentration between baseline and follow up.
The β coefficients are calculated for those observations where the change in 25(OH)D concentrations was in the range of 0 to 75 nmol/L as the association of change in homocysteine and change in serum 25(OH)D concentrations is linear for this range (see Fig 1). As such, a total of 5,029 pairs of baseline and follow up visit were considered, 3,030 had baseline homocysteine concentrations <10 μmol/L, and 1,999 had baseline homocysteine concentrations ≥10 μmol/L. Model 1: adjusted for sex, baseline age (per 10 years), elevated homocysteine, body mass index, hypertension, serum LDL-cholesterol, smoking status, alcohol status, physical activity, and physical activity change during follow up. Model 2: adjusted for the same covariates as model 1, and additionally adjusted for serum vitamin B12 status at baseline and at follow up.
Risk for elevated homocysteine at follow up among 4475 study participants with a total of 6605 follow up visits.
| Univariate | Multivariable | Multivariable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #visits | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| <50 | 1350 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| 50–<75 | 1982 | 0.55 (0.39–0.79) | <0.01 | 0.61 (0.41–0.89) | 0.01 | 0.67 (0.45–0.98) | 0.04 |
| 75–<100 | 1508 | 0.54 (0.37–0.78) | <0.01 | 0.61 (0.39–0.95) | 0.03 | 0.70 (0.44–1.09) | 0.11 |
| 100–<125 | 944 | 0.37 (0.23–0.59) | <0.01 | 0.39 (0.21–0.73) | <0.01 | 0.44 (0.23–0.84) | 0.01 |
| > = 125 | 821 | 0.35 (0.20–0.62) | <0.01 | 0.34 (0.18–0.64) | <0.01 | 0.39 (0.21–0.72) | <0.01 |
| No improvement | 1277 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Increase of < 25 | 1530 | 1.26 (0.90–1.76) | 0.19 | 0.82 (0.56–1.21) | 0.31 | 0.92 (0.62–1.37) | 0.68 |
| Increase of 25–< 50 | 1480 | 0.86 (0.60–1.23) | 0.40 | 0.48 (0.32–0.74) | <0.01 | 0.52 (0.33–0.80) | <0.01 |
| Increase of 50–< 75 | 1017 | 0.60 (0.39–0.92) | 0.02 | 0.29 (0.18–0.49) | <0.01 | 0.34 (0.20–0.58) | <0.01 |
| Increase of > = 75 | 1301 | 0.67 (0.44–1.01) | 0.06 | 0.28 (0.17–0.45) | <0.01 | 0.32 (0.19–0.54) | <0.01 |
| 6605 | 16.6 (12.5–22.0) | <0.01 | 16.7 (12.1–23.0) | <0.01 | 15.7 (11.3–21.6) | <0.01 | |
| 6605 | 2.41 (1.77–3.27) | <0.01 | 1.65 (1.17–2.32) | 1.82 (1.29–2.56) | <0.01 | ||
| 6605 | 1.22 (1.11–1.34) | <0.01 | 1.17 (1.02–1.33) | 0.02 | 1.26 (1.10–1.45) | <0.01 | |
| <18.5 | 60 | 1.51 (0.20–11.49) | 0.69 | 1.44 (0.25–8.27) | 0.68 | 1.53 (0.28–8.33) | 0.62 |
| 18.5–<25.0 | 2014 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| 25.0–<30.0 | 2532 | 1.56 (1.11–2.20) | 0.01 | 1.19 (0.81–1.74) | 0.38 | 1.08 (0.74–1.58) | 0.71 |
| > = 30.0 | 1903 | 1.64 (1.16–2.31) | 0.01 | 1.06 (0.72–1.57) | 0.76 | 0.99 (0.67–1.46) | 0.95 |
| Normal | 4778 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Elevated | 1234 | 1.55 (1.13–2.13) | 0.01 | 1.08 (0.77–1.54) | 0.65 | 1.10 (0.77–1.57) | 0.61 |
| Normal | 2170 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Elevated | 4144 | 1.33 (1.00–1.78) | 0.05 | 1.02 (0.74–1.40) | 0.90 | 0.98 (0.71–1.34) | 0.88 |
| Never smoker | 1904 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Past smoker | 880 | 1.62 (1.05–2.51) | 0.03 | 1.31 (0.83–2.08) | 0.25 | 1.26 (0.79–2.00) | 0.33 |
| Current smoker | 526 | 3.03 (1.92–4.79) | 0.00 | 2.63 (1.50–4.60) | <0.01 | 2.89 (1.62–5.15) | <0.01 |
| Non-drinker | 1392 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Drinker | 1872 | 1.11 (0.75–1.65) | 0.59 | 1.45 (0.96–2.21) | 0.08 | 1.46 (0.95–2.23) | 0.08 |
| Low | 1316 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Moderate | 961 | 0.69 (0.45–1.08) | 0.10 | 0.78 (0.49–1.25) | 0.31 | 0.84 (0.52–1.35) | 0.47 |
| High | 997 | 0.57 (0.36–0.90) | 0.02 | 0.69 (0.41–1.19) | 0.18 | 0.72 (0.41–1.24) | 0.24 |
| No improvement | 970 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Moderate improvement | 641 | 1.34 (0.84–2.12) | 0.22 | 1.36 (0.81–2.26) | 0.24 | 1.32 (0.78–2.23) | 0.30 |
| High improvement | 394 | 0.88 (0.46–1.69) | 0.70 | 0.89 (0.40–1.95) | 0.76 | 0.90 (0.40–2.00) | 0.80 |
| Deficiency/Insufficiency | 328 | Reference | - | - | Reference | ||
| Adequate | 3620 | 0.25 (0.16–0.38) | <0.01 | - | - | 0.89 (0.53–1.50) | 0.66 |
| Deficiency/Insufficiency | 153 | Reference | - | - | Reference | ||
| Adequate | 5765 | 0.11 (0.07–0.17) | <0.01 | - | - | 0.19 (0.11–0.32) | <0.01 |
25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; LDL-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR (95% CI), odds ratio with 95% confidence interval; #visits, numbers of follow up visits; nmol/L, nanomoles per liter.
a Elevated homocysteine was defined as serum concentrations >13 μmol/L.
b The multivariable analysis adjusted for sex, baseline age (per 10 years), baseline elevated homocysteine, body mass index, hypertension, serum LDL-cholesterol, smoking status, alcohol status, physical activity, and physical activity change during follow up.
c The multivariable analysis adjusted for the same confounders as above and additionally adjusted for vitamin B12 status.
d Missing values were considered as ‘a missing category’ in the regression analyses.
e Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medications.
f Elevated LDL-cholesterol was defined as LDL-cholesterol concentration ≥2.6 mmol/L.
g Vitamin B12 adequacy was defined as serum concentrations >220 picomoles per liter.