| Literature DB >> 27548198 |
Chao Liu1,2, Liwen Lu3,4, Ting Huang5, Yalin Huang6,7, Lei Ding8,9, Weituo Zhao10.
Abstract
Exponential industrialization and rapid urbanization have resulted in contamination of soil by metals from anthropogenic sources in Dongguan, China. The aims of this research were to determine the concentration and distribution of various metals (arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn)) in soils and identify their potential health risks for local residents. A total of 106 soil samples were collected from the vicinity of industrial sites in Dongguan. Two types of samples were collected from each site: topsoil (0-20 cm, TS) and shallow soil (20-50 cm, SS). Results showed that the soils were contaminated by metals and pollution was mainly focused on TS. The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) and pollution indexes (PI) implied that there was a slight increase in the concentrations of Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, and Pb, but the metal pollution caused by industrial activities was less severe, and elements of As and Cr exhibited non-pollution level. The risk assessment results suggested that there was a potential health risk associated with As and Cr exposure for residents because the carcinogenic risks of As and Cr via corresponding exposure pathways exceeded the safety limit of 10(-6) (the acceptable level of carcinogenic risk for humans). Furthermore, oral ingestion and inhalation of soil particles are the main exposure pathways for As and Cr to enter the human body. This study may provide basic information of metal pollution control and human health protection in the vicinity of industrial regions.Entities:
Keywords: contaminated soil; geoaccumulation index; human exposure; metal; pollution indexes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27548198 PMCID: PMC4997518 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13080832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The location of the study area and distribution of sampling sites.
The Igeo and classification of pollution degree.
| Pollution Degree | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Uncontaminated | |
| 1 | 0 < | Slightly to moderately contaminated |
| 2 | 1 < | Moderately contaminated |
| 3 | 2 < | Moderately to heavily contaminated |
| 4 | 3 < | Heavily contaminated |
| 5 | 4 < | Heavily to extremely contaminated |
| 6 | Extremely contaminated |
Definition and reference value of some parameters for health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils [32].
| Symbols | Units | Definition | Adult Value | Child Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABSo, ABSd | Absorption factor of oral ingestion and dermal contact of soil particles, respectively | |||
| ATca, ATnc | day | Average time for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects, respectively | 26,280; 2190 | 26,280; 2190 |
| BWa, BWc | kg | Average body weight of adults and children, respectively | 56.8 | 15.9 |
| OISERca, DCSERca, PISERca | kg·kg−1·day−1 | Chronic daily intake or exposure dose through oral ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of soil particles, respectively | ||
| CRois, CRdcs, CRpis | Cancer risk of heavy metal through oral ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of soil particles, respectively | |||
| DAIRa, DAIRc | m3·day−1 | Daily air inhalation rate of adults and children, respectively | 14.5 | 7.5 |
| EDa, EDc | a | Exposure duration of adults and children, respectively | 24 | 6 |
| EFa, EFc | day·a−1 | Exposure frequency of adults and children, respectively | 350 | 350 |
| EFIa, EFIc | day·a−1 | Indoor exposure frequency of adults and children, respectively | 262.5 | 262.5 |
| EFOa, EFOc | day·a−1 | Outdoor exposure frequency of adults and children, respectively | 87.5 | 87.5 |
| Ev | day−1 | Daily exposure frequency of dermal contact event | 1 | 1 |
| fspi, fspo | Fraction of soil-borne particles in indoor and outdoor air, respectively | 0.8; 0.5 | 0.8; 0.5 | |
| HI | Hazard index of heavy metal | |||
| HQois, HQdcs, HQpis | Hazard quotient of heavy metal through oral ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of soil particles, respectively | |||
| OSIRa, OSIRc | mg·day−1 | Daily oral ingestion rate of soils of adults and children, respectively | 100 | 200 |
| PIAF | Retention fraction of inhaled particulates in body | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| PM10 | mg·m−3 | Content of inhalable particulates in ambient air | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| RfDo, RfDd, RfDi | mg·kg−1·day−1 | Reference dose of heavy metal through oral ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of soil particles, respectively | ||
| SAEa, SAEc | cm2 | Surface area of exposed skin for adults and children, respectively | 5075 | 2448 |
| SAF | Soil allocation factor | 0.20 | 0.20 | |
| SFo, SFd, SFi | (mg·kg−1·day−1)−1 | Cancer slope factor of heavy metal via oral ingestion, dermal contact and inhalation of soil particles, respectively | ||
| SSARa, SSARc | mg·cm−2 | Adherence rate of soil on skin for adults and children, respectively | 0.07 | 0.2 |
SF for carcinogenic metals and RfD for non-carcinogenic metals [32].
| Elements | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | 1.50 | 1.50 | 16.80 | 3 × 10−4 | 3 × 10−4 | 3.38 × 10−6 |
| Cd | - | - | 7.05 | 0.001 | 2.5 × 10−5 | 2.55 × 10−6 |
| Cr | 0.50 | 20.00 | 329.00 | 0.003 | 7.5 × 10−5 | 2.55 × 10−5 |
| Cu | - | - | - | 0.04 | 0.04 | - |
| Hg | - | - | - | 3 × 10−4 | 2.1 × 10−5 | 7.66 × 10−5 |
| Ni | - | - | 1.02 | 0.02 | 8 × 10−4 | 2.3 × 10−5 |
| Zn | - | - | - | 0.3 | 0.3 | - |
Figure 2Heavy metal concentrations of soil from the vicinity of industrial sites in Dongguan. TS: topsoils of 0–20 cm, SS: shallow soils of 20–50 cm. The circle symbols (○) represent outliers (mild outliers), and the cross symbols (*) represent extremes (extreme outliers). The horizontal lines at the top, middle and bottom of the box plot correspond to the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively.
Concentrations of heavy metals in topsoils from the vicinity of industrial areas and related soil quality standards.
| Places | Depth | Hg | As | Pb | Cu | Zn | Ni | Cr | Cd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dongguan | This study | 0–20 cm | 0.7 | 7.1 | 61.8 | 48.3 | 92.0 | 42.8 | 40.8 | 0.13 |
| Yan’an | reference [ | 0–20 cm | - | - | 23.97 | 27.31 | 82.15 | 38.01 | 73.88 | 0.11 |
| Weinan | reference [ | 0–15 cm | - | 8.49 | 46.71 | 20.88 | 71.56 | 25.43 | 96.99 | - |
| Lipu | reference [ | 0–15 cm | - | - | 50.11 | 40.77 | - | 53.65 | 46.98 | 0.19 |
| Chinese [ | I | - | 0.15 | 15 | 35 | 35 | 100 | 40 | 90 | 0.2 |
| II (pH < 6.5) | - | 0.3 | 40 | 250 | 50 | 200 | 40 | 150 | 0.3 | |
| III | - | 1.5 | 40 | 500 | 400 | 500 | 200 | 300 | 1 | |
| Guangdong background values [ | - | 0.078 | 8.9 | 36.0 | 17.0 | 47.3 | 14.4 | 50.5 | 0.056 | |
| Dutch [ | Target values | - | 0.3 | 29 | 85 | 36 | 140 | 35 | 100 | 0.8 |
| Intervention values | - | 10 | 55 | 530 | 190 | 720 | 210 | 380 | 12 | |
I. the limits for protecting ecosystem; II. the maximum allowable concentrations of metals in agriculture soil of China; III. the upper limit values for regular growing of plants.
Correlation coefficient among different metals in topsoils around industrial sites in Dongguan.
| Elements | Hg | As | Pb | Cu | Zn | Ni | Cr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | −0.069 | 1 | |||||
| Pb | 0.221 | 0.257 | 1 | ||||
| Cu | 0.199 | 0.101 | 0.523 ** | 1 | |||
| Zn | 0.119 | −0.043 | 0.395 ** | 0.637 ** | 1 | ||
| Ni | 0.264 | −0.234 | 0.348 * | 0.520 ** | 0.455 ** | 1 | |
| Cr | 0.089 | 0.043 | 0.183 | 0.033 | −0.089 | 0.185 | 1 |
| Cd | 0.245 | −0.011 | 0.062 | 0.076 | 0.087 | 0.261 | 0.121 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 3Box plot of Igeo for heavy metals in topsoils around industrial sites in Dongguan. The circles represent outliers (mild outliers), and the stars represent extremes (extreme outliers). The horizontal lines at the top, middle and bottom of the box plot correspond to the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively.
Statistical results of pollution index (PI) of heavy metals in topsoils around industrial sites in Dongguan.
| Elements | Number of Samples | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Min | Max | h.p a | m.p a | l.p a | n.p a | |
| As | 0.80 | 0.13 | 2.29 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 40 |
| Cd | 2.36 | 1.79 | 10.54 | 6 | 20 | 27 | 0 |
| Cr | 0.81 | 0.26 | 2.24 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 43 |
| Cu | 2.84 | 0.16 | 26.21 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
| Hg | 8.89 | 0.49 | 32.70 | 36 | 5 | 10 | 2 |
| Ni | 2.97 | 0.54 | 43.63 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 16 |
| Pb | 1.72 | 0.60 | 6.71 | 4 | 6 | 36 | 7 |
| Zn | 1.95 | 0.29 | 10.59 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 18 |
a h.p: high level pollution; m.p: moderate level pollution; l.p: low level pollution; n.p: non-pollution.
Figure 4The mean pollution index (PI) of heavy metals in topsoils in different towns of Dongguan.
Figure 5Carcinogenic risks of heavy metals in topsoils around industrial sites in Dongguan.
Figure 6Non-carcinogenic risks of heavy metals in topsoils around industrial sites in Dongguan.