| Literature DB >> 27548143 |
Dae Young Lee1, Soo-Im Choi2, Se Hee Han3, Ye-Joo Lee4,5, Jong-Gil Choi6, Young-Seob Lee7, Je Hun Choi8, Seung-Eun Lee9, Geum-Soog Kim10.
Abstract
Pseudoshikonin I, the new bioactive constituent of Lithospermi radix, was isolated from this methanol extract by employing reverse-phase medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) using acetonitrile/water solvent system as eluents. The chemical structure was determined based on spectroscopic techniques, including 1D NMR (¹H, (13)C, DEPT), 2D NMR (gCOSY, gHMBC, gHMQC), and QTOF/MS data. In this study, we demonstrated the effect of pseudoshikonin I on matrix-metalloproteinase (MMPs) activation and expression in interleukin (IL)-1β-induced SW1353 chondrosarcoma cells. MMPs are considered important for the maintenance of the extracellular matrix. Following treatment with PS, active MMP-1, -2, -3, -9, -13 and TIMP-2 were quantified in the SW1353 cell culture supernatants using a commercially available ELISA kit. The mRNA expression of MMPs in SW1353 cells was measured by RT-PCR. Pseudoshikonin I treatment effectively protected the activation on all tested MMPs in a dose-dependent manner. TIMP-2 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated by pseudoshikonin I treatment. Overall, we elucidated the inhibitory effect of pseudoshikonin on MMPs, and we suggest its use as a potential novel anti-osteoarthritis agent.Entities:
Keywords: Lithospermi radix; matrix-metalloproteinase (MMPs); nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); pseudoshikonin I
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27548143 PMCID: PMC5000746 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17081350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structure of compound 1 isolated from the Lithospermi radix and key gHMBC (arrow) correlations of compound 1.
Figure 2Cell viability of pseudoshikonin I in SW1353 cells. SW1353 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of pseudoshikonin I for 24 h. Normal represents samples only supplied with DMEM and cell viability assay being conducted by the MTT method. Results are expressed as the percentage change of control condition in which cells were grown in medium without pseudoshikonin I. Results shown are mean S.D. of experiments in triplicate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 compared with control.
IC50 value of pseudoshikonin I on the activity of MMP-1, 2, 3, 9, and 13 in IL-1β-induced SW1353 cells a.
| Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP) | IC50 Value (μM) |
|---|---|
| MMP-1 | 58.7 |
| MMP-2 | 60.8 |
| MMP-3 | >100 |
| MMP-9 | >100 |
| MMP-13 | 63.3 |
| TIMP-2 | – |
a SW1353 cells incubated in the presence of 10, 25, 50, or 100 μM pseudoshikonin I stimulated with 20 ng/mL of IL-1β for 24 h. Results are expressed as the means ± S.D. of triple experiments.
Primer sequences for reverse transcription PCR.
| Gene Code | Accession ID | Sequence (5′→3′) | Temperature (°C) | Product Length (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP-1 | NM_001145938.1 | Forward | AGTGACTGGGAAACCAGATGA | 57 | 159 |
| Reverse | CGTCTTGGCAAATCTGGCCTGTAA | ||||
| MMP-2 | NM_001127891.2 | Forward | GCAGTGGGGGCTTAAGAAGA | 57 | 969 |
| Reverse | AGCCGTACTTGCCATCCTTC | ||||
| MMP-3 | NM_002422.3 | Forward | ATTCCATGGAGCCAGGCTTTC | 57 | 142 |
| Reverse | CATTTGGGTCAAACTCCACTGTG | ||||
| MMP-9 | NM_004994.2 | Forward | CATCCGGCACCTCTATGGTC | 57 | 637 |
| Reverse | CATCGTCCACCGGACTCAAA | ||||
| MMP-13 | NM_002427.3 | Forward | AAATTATGGAGGAGATGCCCATT | 57 | 125 |
| Reverse | TCCTTGGAGTGGTCAAGACCTAA | ||||
| TIMP-2 | NM_003255.4 | Forward | GTAGTGATCAGGGCCAAAGC | 57 | 160 |
| Reverse | GGGGGCCGTGATAAACT | ||||
| GAPDH | NM_001256799.2 | Forward | AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG | 52 | 271 |
| Reverse | AGGGGCCATCAGTCTTC | ||||
Figure 3Effect of pseudoshikonin I on the gene expression of MMP-1, 2, 3, 9, 13, and TIMP-2 in IL-1β-induced SW1353 cells by RT-PCR. SW1353 cells incubated in the presence of 50 or 100 μM pseudoshikonin I stimulated with 20 ng/mL of IL-1β for 24 h. GAPDH was used as internal control. Values were expressed as means ± S.D. of triple experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with IL-1β treated group (control).