Literature DB >> 27547945

Hospital Variation and Patient Characteristics Associated With Vena Cava Filter Utilization.

Joshua D Brown1, Jeffery C Talbert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a wide variation in the use of vena cava filter (VCF).
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the hospital and patient characteristics associated with VCF use in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).
METHODS: Inpatient discharge data from all acute care hospitals with DVT/PE during 2008-2014 in Kentucky were used. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationships of study variables with VCF use.
RESULTS: During the study period, 81,922 discharges for DVT/PE were observed and 10.5% of these received a VCF. This included 12,083 cases of PE+DVT, 18,571 cases of PE only, and 51,268 cases of DVT only. VCF use among these groups was 22.7%, 6.0%, and 7.8%, respectively. In adjusted analyses, VCF use was associated with increasing age, indicating that those over age 65 were twice as likely to receive a filter compared with the reference (21-25 y old) group. Significant comorbidities associated with VCF use included cancer, liver disease, cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, anemia, and concurrent bleeding. Lower extremity, proximal DVTs, and patients receiving thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy, those having surgery, and those who were unstable or had trauma, were also more likely to receive a filter. Among cancer types, brain and metastatic tumors were significantly associated with VCF use. Between-hospital variation after controlling for all covariates was 7.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: There was high variation in the use of VCFs. Several high-risk subgroups were more likely to use VCFs including older adults and those with cancer and concurrent bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27547945      PMCID: PMC5145746          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

1.  A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group.

Authors:  H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Venous thrombotic, thromboembolic, and mechanical complications after retrievable inferior vena cava filters for major trauma.

Authors:  K M Ho; J A Tan; M Burrell; S Rao; P Misur
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Effectiveness of inferior vena cava filters on mortality as an adjuvant to antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  Toshiaki Isogai; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiroki Matsui; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Risk stratification strategies for cancer-associated thrombosis: an update.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 6.  Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Jasmijn F Timp; Sigrid K Braekkan; Henri H Versteeg; Suzanne C Cannegieter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  A population-based study of the effectiveness of inferior vena cava filter use among patients with venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  R H White; H Zhou; J Kim; P S Romano
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-07-10

8.  Inferior vena cava filter usage, complications, and retrieval rate in cancer patients.

Authors:  Farhad Abtahian; Beau M Hawkins; David P Ryan; Philip Cefalo; Nicola J Nasser; Cheryl MacKay; Michael R Jaff; Ido Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 9.  International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Authors:  D Farge; P Debourdeau; M Beckers; C Baglin; R M Bauersachs; B Brenner; D Brilhante; A Falanga; G T Gerotzafias; N Haim; A K Kakkar; A A Khorana; R Lecumberri; M Mandala; M Marty; M Monreal; S A Mousa; S Noble; I Pabinger; P Prandoni; M H Prins; M H Qari; M B Streiff; K Syrigos; H Bounameaux; H R Büller
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  High variation between hospitals in vena cava filter use for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Richard H White; Estella Marie Geraghty; Ann Brunson; Susan Murin; Ted Wun; Fred Spencer; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient and hospital characteristics predictive of inferior vena cava filter usage in venous thromboembolism patients: A study from the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Authors:  Amie Goodin; Ming Chen; Driss Raissi; Qiong Han; Hong Xiao; Joshua Brown
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Rates and Factors Associated With Retrieval in a Large US Cohort.

Authors:  Joshua D Brown; Driss Raissi; Qiong Han; Val R Adams; Jeffery C Talbert
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Non-retrieval of inferior vena cava filters as a patient safety concern: evaluation of a new process improvement project to increase retrieval rates in a vascular and interventional radiology clinic.

Authors:  Joshua Brown; Jeffery Talbert; Ryan Pennington; Qiong Han; Driss Raissi
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2018-03-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.