| Literature DB >> 27547801 |
Maximiliano Figueroa1, Julie Vandenameele2, Erik Goormaghtigh3, Marie Valerio-Lepiniec4, Philippe Minard4, André Matagne2, Cécile Van de Weerdt5.
Abstract
The artificial protein Octarellin V.1 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2016.05.004[1]) was obtained through a direct evolution process over the de novo designed Octarellin V (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01206-8[2]). The protein has been characterized by circular dichroism and fluorescence techniques, in order to obtain data related to its thermo and chemical stability. Moreover, the data for the secondary structure content studied by circular dichroism and infra red techniques is reported for the Octarellin V and V.1. Two crystallization helpers, nanobodies (http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.039[3]) and αRep (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.048[4]), have been used to create stable complexes. Here we present the data obtained of the binding characterization of the Octarellin V.1 with the crystallization helpers by isothermal titration calorimetry.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial proteins; Circular dichroism; Crystallization helpers; Infra red spectroscopy; Isothermal Titration Calorimetry; Protein design
Year: 2016 PMID: 27547801 PMCID: PMC4982917 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.07.036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Biophysical characterization of Octarellin V.1. A) Infrared spectrum of Octarellin V and Octarellin V.1 recorded between 1800 and 1400 cm−1. Secondary structure was evaluated for both Octarellin V and Octarellin V.1. The determined helix contents were respectively 28% and 30% (standard deviation in cross-validation: 5.7%) and the sheet contents respectively 17% and 16% (SD: 6.7%). B) Far-UV CD spectra of Octarellins V and V.1, were recorded at 25 °C, in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, with protein concentration of 4.2 mM. The structural content of Octarellin V.1 was calculated from its spectrum, over the wavelength range of 250–190 nm. The results are: ~32%, ~22%, ~19%, and ~26% for helices, strands, turns, and unordered structures, respectively, with no significant structural differences as compared to Octarellin V. C) Urea-induced equilibrium unfolding transition of Octarellin V.1 at pH 8, 25 °C, monitored by the change in fluorescence intensity at 335 nm (○) and the change in ellipticity at 222 nm (•). Data were analyzed on the basis of a two-state model and the solid line was drawn using ∆GNU=31 kJ mol−1 and mNU=−5 kJ mol−1 M−1. The inset shows the GdmCl unfolding transition as obtained by far UV-CD at 222 nm, with the solid line drawn using ∆GNU=26 kJ mol−1 and mNU=−9.7 kJ mol−1 M−1. All data are presented as the fractional change in signal as a function of denaturant concentration.
Fig. 2Octarellin V.1 shows no heat-induced denaturation. A) Far-UV CD spectra of Octarellin V.1 at 25 °C (black), 90 °C (red), and after cooling from 90 to 25 °C (green). A melting curve in the range of 25–90 °C, obtained by monitoring the ellipticity at 222 nm, is shown as an insert. B) Melting curve in the range 20–95 °C followed by tryptophan fluorescence. No structural transition is observed and the decrease in the signal intensity is merely due to heat-induced quenching. To corroborate this observation, the comparison of fluorescence spectra recorded at 20 °C and 95 °C (panel C) shows no shift in λmax, indicating no significant change in the environment of indole tryptophan side chain. D) Redshift of the fluorescence emission spectrum following chemically-induced denaturation of Octarellin V.1 in presence of 5.5 M GdmCl.
Fig. 3Characterization of the protein complexes nanobody/Octarellin V.1 and aRep/Octarellin V.1 by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). A) αRep/Octarellin V.1 complex. ITC characterization showed a Kd=0.45 μM and 1:1 stoichiometry (N=1.16). B) Nanobody/Octarellin V.1 complex. ITC characterization showed a Kd=15.09 nM and again 1:1 stoichiometry (N=0.979).
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |