| Literature DB >> 27547388 |
Sabuktagin Rahman1, Tahmeed Ahmed1, Ahmed Shafiqur Rahman1, Nurul Alam2, A M Shamsir Ahmed3, Santhia Ireen1, Ireen Akhter Chowdhury4, Fatima Parveen Chowdhury5, S M Mustafizur Rahman6.
Abstract
Bangladesh is a country with a high burden of micronutrient malnutrition. Stunting affects 41 % of children aged under 5 years. Zn is one of the key micronutrients that is associated with stunting. The present study, as part of the national micronutrient survey 2011-2012, revealed for the first time the nationally representative prevalence of Zn deficiency and determined the associations of the condition. A cross-sectional 'nationwide' survey was conducted in pre-school-age children (6-59 months; PSAC) and non-pregnant non-lactating women (15-49 years; NPNLW). Multistage random sampling was done in 150 clusters; fifty in each of the rural, urban and slum strata. Data were analysed on 662 PSAC and 1073 NPNLW. Serum Zn was assayed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Zn deficiency was defined as serum Zn of <9·9 and <10·1 µmol/l in PSAC and NPNLW, respectively. The national prevalence of Zn deficiency was 44·6 and 57·3 % in PSAC and NPNLW, respectively. In PSAC, it was 29·5, 48·6 and 51·7 %, respectively, in urban, rural and slum strata. Household expenses (β = 0·13; P = 0·007), Hb (β = 0·10; P = 0·005), intake of animal-source Zn (β = 0·096; P = 0·02) and asset score (β = 0·11; P = 0·03) were positively associated with serum Zn in NPNLW. Residence in an urban area (β = 0·33; P = 0·03) and intake of plant-origin Zn (β = -0·13; P = 0·038) determined higher and lower status of Zn in PSAC, respectively. Zn deficiency was highly prevalent in Bangladesh, and it was principally related to inadequate quality of diet. To improve Zn nutrition, Bangladesh needs to strengthen research and programmes related to Zn biofortification, fortification and phytate-reducing technologies in the food system in the short and medium term. In addition, promotion of animal-source Zn for all is important in the long run.Entities:
Keywords: AGP, α-1-acid glycoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein; Children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women; PSAC, pre-school-age children; QC, quality control; Rural, urban and slum; SES, socio-economic status; Women in Bangladesh; Zinc deficiency; Zinc intake
Year: 2016 PMID: 27547388 PMCID: PMC4976114 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2016.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Prevalence of zinc deficiency*†‡
(Number of subjects, percentages and 95 % confidence intervals)
| Population | % | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSAC | |||
| National | 662 | 44·6 | 34·3, 54·9 |
| Rural | 228 | 48·6 | 35·8, 61·4 |
| Urban | 236 | 29·5 | 17·7, 41·3 |
| Slum | 198 | 51·7 | 40·8, 62·7 |
| NPNLW | |||
| National | 1073 | 57·3 | 51·1, 63·4 |
| Rural | 391 | 57·5 | 49·9, 65·1 |
| Urban | 359 | 54·5 | 45·5, 63·6 |
| Slum | 323 | 66·4 | 55·1, 77·6 |
PSAC, pre-school-age children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women; CRP, C-reactive protein; AGP, α-1-acid glycoprotein.
Zn deficiency is defined as serum Zn level of <9·9 µmol/l in PSAC and <10·1 µmol/l in NPNLW().
Adjusted for elevated CRP (>10 mg/l) or elevated AGP (>1 g/l) by mathematical correction(,).
Estimates weighted to represent at the population level.
Age 6–59 months.
Age 15–49 years.
Mean zinc concentration in serum (μmol/l)‡§
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| PSAC | NPNLW | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | |||
| National | 10·25 | 2·34 | 10·04 | 1·72 |
| Rural | 10·04 | 1·75 | 10·06** | 1·76 |
| Urban | 11·02*** | 3·68 | 10·05* | 1·55 |
| Slum | 9·89 | 1·60 | 9·67 | 1·67 |
PSAC, pre-school-age children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women; CRP, C-reactive protein; AGP, α-1-acid glycoprotein.
Mean value was significantly different from that for slum: *P = 0·017, ** P = 0·012, *** P < 0·001.
Mean value was significantly different from that for rural (P < 0·001).
Adjusted for elevated CRP (>10 mg/l) or elevated AGP (>1 g/l) by mathematical correction(,).
Estimates weighted to represent at the population level.
Age 6–59 months.
Age 15–49 years.
One-way ANOVA.
Dietary intake of zinc and prevalence of inadequacy of zinc intake
(Mean values and standard deviations; percentages with their standard errors)
| Intake of Zn (mg/d) | Prevalence of inadequate Zn intake (%) | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National | Rural | Urban | Slum | National | Rural | Urban | Slum | |||||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | % | % | % | % | |||||||||
| PSAC | 3·1 | 2·1 | 3·1 | 2·1 | 3·2* | 2·0 | 2·6 | 1·5 | 32·6 | 5·0 | 33·0 | 6·5 | 28·7 | 5·5 | 44·1 | 4·6 |
| NPNLW | 4·2 | 2·5 | 4·1 | 2·2 | 4·6** | 2·3 | 4·1 | 2·0 | 91·1 | 1·5 | 91·5 | 1·8 | 89·2 | 2·7 | 91·1 | 1·7 |
PSAC, pre-school-age children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women.
Mean value was significantly different from that for slum: * P = 0·004, ** P = 0·001.
One-way ANOVA.
Inadequate Zn intake: <2 mg/d in PSAC; <7 mg/d in NPNLW().
Fig. 1.Comparative intake of dietary zinc and phytate in urban and slum strata. Intakes of total zinc and animal-source zinc were significantly higher in the urban stratum than in the slum stratum in both the pre-school-age children (PSAC) and non-pregnant non-lactating women (NPNLW) populations: 22·4 mg/7 d (urban) v. 18·2 mg/7 d (slum) (P = 0·004) and 9·3 mg/7 d (urban) v. 7·3 mg/7 d (slum) (P = 0·005), respectively, for total and animal-origin zinc in PSAC. However, intake of phytate was at similar levels: 1567 mg/7 d (urban) v. 1533 mg/7 d (slum) (NS) in PSAC. Similar profiles of the intake were observed in NPNLW. Significantly different from slum: * P = 0·01, ** P = 0·004, *** P = 0·005, **** P = 0·001.
Intake of zinc v. RDA
(Mean values with their standard errors; percentages with their standard errors)
| B: % population meeting RDA | C: intake (mg/d) | E: intake of animal Zn (mg/d) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | A: RDA (mg/d) | % | Mean | D: intake as % of RDA | Mean | F: % animal Zn to total intake | |||
| PSAC 2–3 years | 3 | 44·7 | 5·3 | 2·8 | 0·2 | 93·6 | 1·13 | 0·1 | 40·2 |
| PSAC 4–5 years | 5 | 11·4 | 3·4 | 3·2 | 0·3 | 64·0 | 1·15 | 0·1 | 35·9 |
| NPNLW 15–18 years | 9 | 0·5 | 0·03 | 4·0 | 0·2 | 44·4 | 1·33 | 0·1 | 33·2 |
| NPNLW 19–49 years | 8 | 6·4 | 1·3 | 4·3 | 0·2 | 53·6 | 1·28 | 0·1 | 29·8 |
PSAC, pre-school-age children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women.
Institute of Medicine().
D = C/A × 100.
F = E/C × 100.
Intake of animal-source zinc and phytate by socio-economic status (SES) and household food insecurity
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Intake of animal-source Zn (mg/d) | 7-d intake of phytate (mg) | Household spending (USD/month) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Mean | Mean | ||||
| NPNLW | ||||||
| Poorest | 0·8a | 0·7 | 3388 | 1693 | 76·8a | 30·4 |
| Middle | 1·4b | 1·1 | 3533 | 1367 | 125·5b | 57·1 |
| Richest | 2·1c | 1·2 | 3521 | 1335 | 225·9c | 121·3 |
| PSAC | ||||||
| Poorest | 0·6a | 0·7 | 1636 | 698 | 76·3a | 28·9 |
| Middle | 1·3b | 0·8 | 1782 | 712 | 124·3b | 72·1 |
| Richest | 1·8c | 1·1 | 1546 | 659 | 212·5c | 111·1 |
| NPNLW | ||||||
| FS | 1·6 | 1·1 | 3524 | 1364 | 146·1 | 96·9 |
| MI | 0·9 | 0·8 | 3626 | 1806 | 101·9 | 48·9 |
| SI | 0·7 | 0·7 | 3281 | 1634 | 98·7 | 58·5 |
| PSAC | ||||||
| FS | 1·5 | 1·0 | 1700 | 574 | 144·4 | 92·1 |
| MI | 0·9 | 0·9 | 1756 | 1126 | 95·2 | 41·9 |
| SI | 0·5 | 0·5 | 1562 | 765 | 81·1 | 49·8 |
USD, US dollars; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women; PSAC, pre-school-age children; FS, food secure; MI, moderate insecure; SI, severe insecure.
a,b,c Mean values within a column within a category with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·001).
Mean value was significantly different from that for FS (P < 0·001).
Mean value was significantly different from that for SI (P = 0·001).
One-way ANOVA.
Zinc status in non-pregnant non-lactating women sorted by dietary type and food intake
(Percentages with their standard errors, and mean values and standard deviations)
| A: Zn deficiency | B: inadequate Zn intake | C: total Zn intake (mg/d) | G: meat intake (g/d) | H: fish intake (g/d) | I: egg intake (g/d) | J: cereal intake (g/d) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | Mean | D: absorbable Zn intake (mg/d)‡§ | E: physiological requirement (mg/d) | F: % of physiological requirement met | Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | ||||||||
| Mixed diet | 59·2* | 3·3 | 90·1** | 1·6 | 4·5** | 2·2 | 1·41 | 1·86 | 75·8 | 27·6** | 35·6 | 58·6** | 44·3 | 11·7** | 17·4 | 337·1** | 132 |
| Cereal-based diet | 48·3 | 6·4 | 100·0 | 0 | 2·4 | 1·0 | 0·56 | 1·86 | 30·1 | 6·7 | 10·6 | 22·5 | 17·9 | 3·4 | 9·4 | 457·4 | 211 |
Significantly different from cereal-based diet: * P = 0·32, ** P < 0·001.
Dietary Zn intake <7 mg/d (estimated average requirement) in women().
Absorption in women of 31 and 23 % for mixed and unrefined cereal-based diets, respectively().
D = C × 0·31 and D = C × 0·23 for mixed and cereal based diets, respectively().
Physiological requirement of absorbed Zn in adult women().
F = D/E × 100.
Phytate-Zn molar ratio (4–18)().
Phytate-Zn molar ratio (>18)().
Dietary intake of zinc and serum levels of zinc
(Mean values with their standard errors)
| Intake of Zn (mg/d) | Serum Zn (μmol/l) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intake levels of Zn (mg/d) | Mean | Mean | ||
| PSAC | ||||
| 2·5–3·49 | 3·0 | 0·04 | 9·74 | 0·24 |
| 3·5–4·49 | 3·9 | 0·03 | 9·81 | 0·26 |
| 4·5–5·49 | 4·9 | 0·05 | 10·18 | 0·50 |
| 5·5–6·49 | 6·1 | 0·07 | 10·42 | 0·66 |
| NPNLW | ||||
| 2·5–3·49 | 2·9 | 0·03 | 10·16 | 0·14 |
| 3·5–4·49 | 4·0 | 0·03 | 9·74 | 0·23 |
| 4·5–5·49 | 5·0 | 0·02 | 9·66 | 0·27 |
| 5·5–6·49 | 6·0 | 0·04 | 10·29 | 0·46 |
| 6·5–7·49 | 7·0 | 0·04 | 10·77 | 0·38 |
| 7·5–8·49 | 7·9 | 0·06 | 10·19 | 0·58 |
PSAC, pre-school-age children; NPNLW, non-pregnant non-lactating women.
One-way ANOVA.
Multivariate regression determining zinc level in serum in pre-school-age children (PSAC) and non-pregnant non-lactating women (NPNLW)
| PSAC | NPNLW | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates | Coefficient | β | Coefficient | β | ||
| Hb | 0·001 | 0·98 | 0·0009 | 0·18 | 0·005 | 0·10 |
| Household expenses | 0·18 | 0·43 | 0·06 | 0·42 | 0·007 | 0·13 |
| Age | 0·014 | 0·22 | 0·08 | −0·012 | −0·07 | −0·07 |
| Occupation of household head | ||||||
| Non-agricultural (reference agricultural) | 0·29 | 0·21 | 0·085 | 0·27 | 0·054 | 0·07 |
| Women's education | ||||||
| Secondary (reference below secondary) | 0·17 | 0·59 | 0·033 | −0·003 | 0·98 | −0·0005 |
| Intake of animal-source Zn | 0·00003 | 0·07 | 0·13 | 0·00002 | 0·02 | 0·096 |
| Intake of plant-source Zn | −0·000025 | 0·038 | −0·13 | −0·00002 | 0·001 | −0·13 |
| Asset score | 0·08 | 0·58 | 0·05 | 0·23 | 0·03 | 0·11 |
| Area of residence | ||||||
| Urban (reference slum) | 1·37 | 0·03 | 0·33 | 0·18 | 0·64 | 0·04 |
| HFIAS score | 0·04 | 0·12 | 0·11 | 0·02 | 0·10 | 0·066 |
HFIAS, Household Food Insecurity Access Scale.
Interaction terms – (occupation of household head × intake of animal-source Zn), (occupation of household head × intake of plant-source Zn), (asset score × intake of animal-source Zn), (household expenses × intake of animal-source Zn), (stratum × intake of animal-source Zn), and (household expenses × educational status of women) were separately assessed through initial regression equations, along with component predictors. However, none of the interaction terms reached statistical significance level at P < 0·05 except for (household expenses × occupation of household head) (P = 0·049), which was considered in the final multivariate model; however, it had a non-significant interaction (P = 0·44) and as such was removed from the model.
Interaction terms – all the interaction terms assessed for the PSAC were tested in NPNLW. In the initial regression analyses none had significant interaction except for the household expenses × intake of animal-source Zn (P = 0·03). It was considered in the final multivariate model where it is reported to have significant interaction (P = 0·01).