| Literature DB >> 27547353 |
Jessica L McKenzie1, Rashpal S Dhillon2, Patricia M Schulte3.
Abstract
Steep genetic clines resulting from recent secondary contact between previously isolated taxa can either gradually erode over time or be stabilized by factors such as ecological selection or selection against hybrids. We used patterns of variation in 30 nuclear and two mitochondrial SNPs to examine the factors that could be involved in stabilizing clines across a hybrid zone between two subspecies of the Atlantic killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Increased heterozygote deficit and cytonuclear disequilibrium in populations near the center of the mtDNA cline suggest that some form of reproductive isolation such as assortative mating or selection against hybrids may be acting in this hybrid zone. However, only a small number of loci exhibited these signatures, suggesting locus-specific, rather than genomewide, factors. Fourteen of the 32 loci surveyed had cline widths inconsistent with neutral expectations, with two SNPs in the mitochondrial genome exhibiting the steepest clines. Seven of the 12 putatively non-neutral nuclear clines were for SNPs in genes related to oxidative metabolism. Among these putatively non-neutral nuclear clines, SNPs in two nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes (SLC25A3 and HDDC2), as well as SNPs in the myoglobin, 40S ribosomal protein S17, and actin-binding LIM protein genes, had clines that were coincident and concordant with the mitochondrial clines. When hybrid index was calculated using this subset of loci, the frequency distribution of hybrid indices for a population located at the mtDNA cline center was non-unimodal, suggesting selection against advanced-generation hybrids, possibly due to effects on processes involved in oxidative metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Bimodal; SNPs; mtDNA; mummichog; selection
Year: 2016 PMID: 27547353 PMCID: PMC4983590 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Location of collection sites and sample sizes
| Location | Distance to Sapelo Island, GA (km) | Collection | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°W) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Wiscasset, ME | 1968.44 | Williams et al. ( | 44.00289 | −69.66558 | 30 |
| 2. Sandwich, MA | 1691.84 | Williams et al. ( | 41.75896 | −70.49393 | 20 |
| 3. Point Judith, RI | 1591.72 | Williams et al. ( | 41.36538 | −71.48672 | 21 |
| 4. Clinton, CT | 1504.04 | Williams et al. ( | 41.27872 | −72.52761 | 21 |
| 5. Cheesequake, NJ | 1322.31 | Current study | 40.463420 | −74.258888 | 39 |
| 6. Belford, NJ | 1308.90 | Current study | 40.440968 | −74.103963 | 50 |
| 7. Sandy Hook, NJ | 1297.07 | Current study | 40.412904 | −73.969487 | 50 |
| 8. Navesink, NJ | 1292.51 | Current study | 40.376297 | −73.993993 | 13 |
| 9. Metedeconk, NJ | 1257.39 | Current study | 40.065616 | −74.065320 | 49 |
| 10. Laurel, NJ | 1220.73 | Current study | 39.750349 | −74.192734 | 49 |
| 11. Tuckerton, NJ | 1200.06 | Williams et al. ( | 39.60317 | −74.34015 | 20 |
| 12. RUMFS, NJ | 1189.90 | Current study | 39.512905 | −74.320450 | 50 |
| 13. Magotha, VA | 890.28 | Williams et al. ( | 37.18014 | −75.94882 | 20 |
| 14. Manteo, NC | 744.30 | Williams et al. ( | 35.90823 | −75.67573 | 20 |
| 15. Sapelo Island, GA | 0 | Williams et al. ( | 31.39745 | −81.27871 | 33 |
Figure 1Map of sampling locations. Numbers correspond to the locations given in Table 1.
Putative gene identifications for SNP loci
| Locus No. | Gene name | Gene function | SNP location and effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atrial Natriuretic Peptide | Hormone activity; regulation of blood pressure | 3′ UTR |
| 2 | Chymotrypsinogen | Hydrolase activity; digestion |
Coding (CGT to CGC) |
| 3 | Ribosomal protein S2 | Protein synthesis |
ACT to ACC |
| 4 | Translationally controlled tumor protein | Transcription factor binding; negative regulator of apoptosis | 3′ UTR |
| 5 | Ribosomal protein | Protein synthesis |
Coding (GAG to GGG) |
| 6 | Guanine nucleotide binding protein (G‐protein), beta polypeptide 2 like 1; also called RACK1 | Receptor of activated protein kinase C1 (RACK1); apoptosis |
Coding (ACC to ACT) |
| 7 | NACA; nascent polypeptide‐associated complex subunit alphalike protein | DNA binding; cardiac development |
Coding (GTA to GAA) |
| 8 | Titin cap | Sarcomere assembly; muscle |
Coding (GAG to GAC) |
| 9 | SNP name 1176_169; Probable intergenic region; No annotated gene (nearest neighbor gene gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor type B subunit 2) | Unknown | Intergenic |
| 10 | 60S ribosomal protein L6 (RPL6) | Protein synthesis; translation |
Coding (GGG to GGC) |
| 11 | Parvalbumin | Calcium binding; muscle |
Coding (GCT to GCC) |
| 12 | Actin‐binding LIM protein family 3; SNP located in intron | Cytoskeleton organization; muscle | Intron |
| 13 | Myoglobin | Oxygen binding | 3′ UTR |
| 14 | 60S ribosomal protein L35 | Protein synthesis; translation |
Coding (GGC to GGT) |
| 15 | 40S ribosomal protein S17 | Protein synthesis; translation |
Coding (AGT to AGC) |
| 16 | Cytochrome oxidase I (COXI) | Electron transport chain; Mitochondrially encoded |
Coding (GGC to GGT) |
| 17 | Cytochrome B | Electron transport chain; Mitochondrially encoded |
Coding (CTC to CTT) |
| 18 | SLC25A | Phosphate carrier; mitochondrial localization |
Coding (GCG to GCC) |
| 19 | HD domain containing 2 (HDDC2); SNP located in intron | Function Unknown; probable mitochondrial localization | Intron |
| 20 | Warm acclimation‐related protein (Wap65); Hemopexin | Heme binding; oxidative stress |
Coding (GCG to GTG) |
| 21 | Glyceraldehyde 3 phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) | Glycolysis | 3′ UTR |
| 22 | Tropomyosin | Muscle contraction |
Coding (GAA to GAG) |
| 23 | Lactate dehydrogenase_B (SNP 654) | Glycolysis |
Coding (TCC to GCC) |
| 24 | Chymotrypsin‐C | Pancreatic peptidase |
Coding (GAA to GAG) |
| 25 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 1 | Biosynthesis; nucleotide synthesis |
Coding (GAG to GAC) |
| 26 | Lactate dehydrogenase‐B (SNP 1033) | Glycolysis |
Coding (GCC to GAC) |
| 27 | Hemoglobin alpha | Oxygen transport |
Coding (CCA to GCA) |
| 28 | Cytochrome p450 (Cyp3A4) | Metabolism; Monooxygenase |
Coding (ATC to GTC) |
| 29 | 14‐3‐3 zeta | Signaling | 3′ UTR |
| 30 | Hemoglobin beta | Oxygen transport |
Coding (AGT to AGC) |
| 31 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2 | Biosynthesis; nucleotide synthesis | 3′ UTR |
| 32 | Intergenic 1173 | Unknown | Noncoding |
Figure 2Number of loci exhibiting significant heterozygote excess (A) or cytonuclear disequilibrium (B) in each population. Blue bar indicates the location of the putative contact zone as defined in McKenzie et al. (2015) and includes locations 5–12 in Table 1 (all locations in New Jersey).
Figure 3Cline centers (A) and widths (B). Mitochondrial loci highlighted in red. Loci are arranged in the order of increasing distance of the cline center from Georgia. Numbering on the x‐axis corresponds to SNP locus numbers as designated in Table 2. Error bars represent the 2‐unit support limits of the estimates. (A) Dashed line illustrates center of mitochondrial clines. (B) Dashed line represents width of neutral cline calculated from mark–recapture estimate of dispersal. Clines with an upper 2‐unit support limit below the dashed line are putatively non‐neutral.
Figure 4Admixture proportions (q) as calculated with structure, k = 2. Grey denotes the proportion of an individual's multilocus genotype inherited from the northern type (Fundulus heteroclitus heteroclitus); Black bars indicate the proportion contributed from the southern type (Fundulus heteroclitus macrolepidotus). Population numbers correspond to those in Table 1.
Figure 5Histogram of hybrid index values of individuals collected from hybrid zone populations calculated using introgress, with individuals collected from Cheesequake and RUMFS designated as northern and southern parental types, respectively. Hybrid index values were calculated using (A–E) all 30 nuclear SNPs and also calculated using (F–J) a subset of five SNPs. A hybrid index value of 0 indicates a pure southern individual; a hybrid index value of 1 indicates a pure northern individual. Populations are arranged from south to north. Panels A&F, location 11; Panels B&G, location 10; Panels C&H, location 9; Panels D&I, location 7; Panels E&J, location 6. Note that hybrid index was not calculated for location 8 because of a limited sample size.
Figure 6Frequency distribution of hybrid indices as calculated for individuals sampled from Metedeconk across two seasons. Hybrid index values were calculated using (A) all 30 nuclear SNPs and using (B) a subset of five SNPs (locus numbers 12, 13, 15, 18, and 19, Table 2). A hybrid index value of 1 indicates a pure northern individual while a hybrid index value of 0 indicates a pure southern individual.