| Literature DB >> 27547314 |
Megan E Sebasky1, Stephen R Keller2, Douglas R Taylor1.
Abstract
Since the last glacial maximum (LGM), many plant and animal taxa have expanded their ranges by migration from glacial refugia. Weeds of cultivation may have followed this trend or spread globally following the expansion of agriculture or ruderal habitats associated with human-mediated disturbance. We tested whether the range expansion of the weed Silene vulgaris across Europe fit the classical model of postglacial expansion from southern refugia, or followed known routes of the expansion of human agricultural practices. We used species distribution modeling to predict spatial patterns of postglacial expansion and contrasted these with the patterns of human agricultural expansion. A population genetic analysis using microsatellite loci was then used to test which scenario was better supported by spatial patterns of genetic diversity and structure. Genetic diversity was highest in southern Europe and declined with increasing latitude. Locations of ancestral demes from genetic cluster analysis were consistent with areas of predicted refugia. Species distribution models showed the most suitable habitat in the LGM on the southern coasts of Europe. These results support the typical postglacial northward colonization from southern refugia while refuting the east-to-west agricultural spread as the main mode of expansion for S. vulgaris. We know that S. vulgaris has recently colonized many regions (including North America and other continents) through human-mediated dispersal, but there is no evidence for a direct link between the Neolithic expansion of agriculture and current patterns of genetic diversity of S. vulgaris in Europe. Therefore, the history of range expansion of S. vulgaris likely began with postglacial expansion after the LGM, followed by more recent global dispersal by humans.Entities:
Keywords: Glacial refugia; MaxEnt; Silene vulgaris; last glacial maximum; phylogeography; postglacial expansion; species distribution model
Year: 2016 PMID: 27547314 PMCID: PMC4979708 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Microsatellite markers and associated genetic diversity metrics for Silene vulgaris populations in Europe
| Locus | Indiv. scored | No. alleles | Eff. alleles |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL_eSSR01 | 123 | 5 | 1.387 | 0.274 | 0.579 | 0.558 | 0.557 | 0.526 |
| SL_eSSR03 | 137 | 12 | 1.42 | 0.323 | 0.584 | 0.816 | 0.819 | 0.447 |
| SL_eSSR04 | 182 | 7 | 1.233 | 0.269 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.493 | 0.038 |
| SL_eSSR05 | 172 | 7 | 1.414 | 0.414 | 0.421 | 0.567 | 0.569 | 0.017 |
| SL_eSSR012 | 168 | 17 | 1.859 | 0.613 | 0.744 | 0.903 | 0.906 | 0.176 |
| SL_eSSR016 | 184 | 9 | 1.455 | 0.408 | 0.478 | 0.632 | 0.634 | 0.145 |
| SL_eSSR20 | 160 | 5 | 1.232 | 0.166 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.522 | 0.562 |
| SL_eSSR22 | 174 | 6 | 1.118 | 0.106 | 0.203 | 0.226 | 0.227 | 0.48 |
| SL_eSSR28 | 154 | 9 | 1.39 | 0.381 | 0.468 | 0.622 | 0.624 | 0.187 |
| Overall | 8.556 | 1.39 | 0.328 | 0.46 | 0.593 | 0.595 | 0.286 |
H O, Observed heterozygosity; H S, heterozygosity within populations; H t, total heterozygosity; H't, corrected total heterozygosity; G is, inbreeding coefficient.
Figure 1Standardized heterozygosity calculated for Silene vulgaris individuals in Europe and interpolated using the inverse distance weighting method (IDW) in ArcGIS 10.1. Warmer colors show higher genetic diversity, while cooler colors show lower genetic diversity. Dark blue circles show populations used in the analysis.
Environmental variables used in the current and last glacial maximum (LGM) species distribution models (SDMs) for Silene vulgaris in Europe
| Current SDM | LGM (CCSM and MIROC) SDMs |
|---|---|
| Bioclim PC1 | Max. temp. warmest month |
| Bioclim PC2 | Temp. annual range |
| Landcover C1 | Mean temp. wettest quarter |
| Landcover C2 | Mean temp. coldest quarter |
| Precip. driest month | |
| Precip. seasonality | |
| Precip. coldest quarter |
Figure 2Ancestry assignment from STRUCTURE models for Silene vulgaris populations in Europe. (A) Map showing pie charts of population‐averaged ancestry assignment for K = 2. Size of circles indicates sample size of each population. (B) Same as (A) for K = 3.
Percent contribution and permutation importance values for each environmental variable used in the MaxEnt model for the prediction of current distribution of Silene vulgaris in Europe. Each environmental variable is a principal component axis summarizing multiple datasets. Bioclim PC1 and PC2 are the first two principal components of the 19 bioclimatic variables. Landcover C1 and C2 are the two components representing soil type, land cover, and human influence metrics
| Variable | Percent contribution | Permutation importance |
|---|---|---|
| Bioclim PC2 | 70.2 | 60.5 |
| Bioclim PC1 | 27.5 | 32.1 |
| Landcover C1 | 1.4 | 6 |
| Landcover C2 | 1 | 1.4 |
Figure 3Predicted climate suitability for Silene vulgaris in Europe during the last glacial maximum (LGM) based on the community climate system model (CCSM) climate scenario. The hashed blue area shows a generalized extent of the ice sheets during the LGM (Svendsen et al. 2004).
Correlation analysis to assess the relationship between genetic diversity (standardized heterozygosity) of Silene vulgaris individuals in Europe and four variables: geographic location (latitude, longitude), and last glacial maximum climate suitability based on the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) general circulation model. Bold indicates significant P‐values after Bonferroni correction
| Variable | Variable | Spearman's | Prob > | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latitude | Heterozygosity | −0.3478 |
|
| Longitude | Heterozygosity | −0.0919 | 0.2061 |
| Suitability (CCSM) | Heterozygosity | 0.0791 | 0.277 |
| Suitability (CCSM) | Latitude | −0.4692 |
|