Literature DB >> 27546999

Computational fluid dynamic simulation of human carotid artery bifurcation based on anatomy and volumetric blood flow rate measured with magnetic resonance imaging.

Hamidreza Gharahi1, Byron A Zambrano1, David C Zhu2, J Kevin DeMarco3, Seungik Baek1.   

Abstract

Blood flow patterns and local hemodynamic parameters have been widely associated with the onset and progression of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery. Assessment of these parameters can be performed noninvasively using cine phase-contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, in the last two decades, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation in three dimensional models derived from anatomic medical images has been employed to investigate the blood flow in the carotid artery. This study developed a workflow of a subject-specific CFD analysis using MRI to enhance estimating hemodynamics of the carotid artery. Time-of-flight (TOF) MRI scans were used to construct three-dimensional computational models. PC-MRI measurements were utilized to impose the boundary condition at the inlet and a 0-dimensional lumped parameter model was employed for the outflow boundary condition. The choice of different viscosity models of blood flow as a source of uncertainty was studied, by means of the axial velocity, wall shear stress, and oscillatory shear index. The sequence of workflow in CFD analysis was optimized for a healthy subject using PC-MRI. Then, a patient with carotid artery stenosis and its hemodynamic parameters were examined. The simulations indicated that the lumped parameter model used at the outlet gives physiologically reasonable values of hemodynamic parameters. Moreover, the dependence of hemodynamics parameters on the viscosity models was observed to vary for different geometries. Other factors, however, may be required for a more accurate CFD analysis, such as the segmentation and smoothness of the geometrical model, mechanical properties of the artery's wall, and the prescribed velocity profile at the inlet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery bifurcation; Impedance boundary conditions; WSS; nonlinear viscosity models

Year:  2016        PMID: 27546999      PMCID: PMC4987097          DOI: 10.1007/s12572-016-0161-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math        ISSN: 0975-0770


  43 in total

1.  Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions.

Authors:  M S Olufsen; C S Peskin; W Y Kim; E M Pedersen; A Nadim; J Larsen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Wall shear rates differ between the normal carotid, femoral, and brachial arteries: an in vivo MRI study.

Authors:  Sheng Ping Wu; Steffen Ringgaard; Sten Oyre; Michael S Hansen; Stokholm Rasmus; Erik M Pedersen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  AN ELECTRICAL ANALOGUE OF THE ENTIRE HUMAN CIRCULATORY SYSTEM.

Authors:  L DE PATER; J W VAN DEN BERG
Journal:  Med Electron Biol Eng       Date:  1964-04

4.  MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.

Authors:  Ian Marshall; Shunzhi Zhao; Panorea Papathanasopoulou; Peter Hoskins; Yun Xu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Computational models to predict stenosis growth in carotid arteries: which is the role of boundary conditions?

Authors:  R Balossino; G Pennati; F Migliavacca; L Formaggia; A Veneziani; M Tuveri; G Dubini
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries.

Authors:  Merih Cibis; Wouter V Potters; Frank J H Gijsen; Henk Marquering; Ed vanBavel; Antonius F W van der Steen; Aart J Nederveen; Jolanda J Wentzel
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Lee; David A Steinman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Choice of in vivo versus idealized velocity boundary conditions influences physiologically relevant flow patterns in a subject-specific simulation of flow in the human carotid bifurcation.

Authors:  Amanda K Wake; John N Oshinski; Allen R Tannenbaum; Don P Giddens
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Multi-Scale Computational Model of Three-Dimensional Hemodynamics within a Deformable Full-Body Arterial Network.

Authors:  Nan Xiao; Jay D Humphrey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 10.  Review of zero-D and 1-D models of blood flow in the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Yubing Shi; Patricia Lawford; Rodney Hose
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  12 in total

1.  SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF BLOOD FLOW IN ARTERIES OF THE HUMAN ARM.

Authors:  Wu Quanyu; Liu Xiaojie; Pan Lingjiao; Tao Weige; Qian Chunqi
Journal:  Biomed Eng (Singapore)       Date:  2017-08-14

2.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformation venous stenosis is associated with hemodynamic changes at the draining vein-venous sinus junction.

Authors:  Murad Alqadi; Denise Brunozzi; Andreas Linninger; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Fady T Charbel; Ali Alaraj
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  A preliminary study of relationship among the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis, wall shear stress on MR angiography and 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT.

Authors:  Yasukage Takami; Takashi Norikane; Yuka Yamamoto; Kengo Fujimoto; Katsuya Mitamura; Masanobu Okauchi; Masahiko Kawanishi; Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A New Method for Quantifying Abdominal Aortic Wall Shear Stress Using Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Womersley Solution.

Authors:  Elizabeth Iffrig; Lucas H Timmins; Retta El Sayed; W Robert Taylor; John N Oshinski
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.899

5.  Geometric determinants of local hemodynamics in severe carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Dara Azar; William M Torres; Lindsey A Davis; Taylor Shaw; John F Eberth; Vijaya B Kolachalama; Susan M Lessner; Tarek Shazly
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Hemodynamic analysis of carotid artery after endarterectomy: a preliminary and quantitative imaging study based on computational fluid dynamics and magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Dai; Peng Lv; Ashkan Javadzadegan; Xiao Tang; Yi Qian; Jiang Lin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-05

7.  Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Velocity Magnitudes and Flow Patterns in The Human Carotid Artery Bifurcation: Comparison with Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Minh Tri Ngo; Chul In Kim; Jinmu Jung; Gyung Ho Chung; Dong Hwan Lee; Hyo Sung Kwak
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-13

8.  Changes and significance of hydrodynamic parameters in Budd-Chiari syndrome with obstruction of the inferior vena cava prior to and after interventional therapy.

Authors:  Lulu Lyu; Peng Xu; Jie Ping; Chunfeng Hu; Kai Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Computational analysis of aortic haemodynamics in the presence of ascending aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Aleksandra Petuchova; Algirdas Maknickas
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.285

10.  Investigation of Artery Wall Elasticity Effect on the Prediction of Atherosclerosis by Hemodynamic Factors.

Authors:  Rasool Kalbasi; Bahador Sharifzadeh; Mehdi Jahangiri
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 1.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.