Literature DB >> 2754550

Hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception: a second attempt in the operating room with general anesthesia.

D L Collins1, L E Pinckney, K E Miller, J F Bastian, D O Katzman, T G Canty, J Waldman.   

Abstract

Over a 3-year-period, standard treatment with hydrostatic pressure from a contrast enema failed to reduce ileocolic intussusception in 31 of 62 children. With the child anesthetized in the operating room, a second contrast enema was given before laparotomy. Of the 31 intussusceptions, 21 (68%) were reduced without complication, thereby avoiding the discomfort, longer hospitalization, complications, and expense of surgery. Nine of the remaining 10 intussusceptions were difficult to reduce manually during surgery or required resection. The overall nonoperative reduction rate for the 3-year period was 84%; for the last 2 years it was 90%. Success with the second enema may be related to the effects of general anesthesia. In addition, partial reduction with the first enema may improve blood flow from the intussusceptum so that it becomes smaller and easier to reduce with the second enema. Because it can easily be added to standard management protocols without increased risk, routine use of this second enema with anesthesia is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754550     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80066-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  7 in total

1.  Rescue by pneumoenema under general anaesthesia of apparently non-reducible intestinal intussusception.

Authors:  Raquel Diaz-Aldagalán González; Alberto Pérez-Martínez; Javier Pisón-Chacón; Lidia Ayuso-González; Blanca Salcedo-Muñoz; Concepción Goñi-Orayen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  External manual reduction of paediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception with US assistance: a new, standardised, effective and safe manoeuvre.

Authors:  Jose L Vazquez; Manuel Ortiz; Maria C Doniz; Margarita Montero; Victor M Del Campo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-08-09

3.  Partially reduced intussusception: when are repeated delayed reduction attempts appropriate?

Authors:  B Connolly; D J Alton; S H Ein; A Daneman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

4.  The current radiologic management of intussusception: a survey and review.

Authors:  J S Meyer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1992

Review 5.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

6.  The Effect of Midazolam on Decreasing the Duration of Intussusception Hydrostatic Reduction in Children.

Authors:  Ali Eisapour; Raheleh Mehrayin; Mohammadreza Esmaeili-Dooki
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-10-04

Review 7.  Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.545

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.